Literature DB >> 25428697

Objective assessment of technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: what are the existing tools?

J D Foster1, N K Francis.   

Abstract

Assessment can improve the effectiveness of surgical training and enable valid judgments of competence. Laparoscopic colon resection surgery is now taught within surgical residency programs, and assessment tools are increasingly used to stimulate formative feedback and enhance learning. Formal assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic colon resection has been successfully applied at the specialist level in the English "LAPCO" National Training Program. Objective assessment tools need to be developed for training and assessment in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection surgery. Simulation may have a future role in assessment and accreditation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery; however, existing virtual reality models are not ready to be used for assessment of this advanced surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25428697     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1242-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

1.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Helen M MacRae; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Susannah M Wyles; Melody Ni; Ara W Darzi; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Workplace-based assessment: assessing technical skill throughout the continuum of surgical training.

Authors:  Jonathan Beard; David Rowley; Maria Bussey; David Pitts
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

7.  Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Isis Kumar; Conor Delaney
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm.

Authors:  M G Coleman; G B Hanna; R Kennedy
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Robin H Kennedy; Nader K Francis; Amjad Parvaiz; Chris Cunningham; Timothy A Rockall; Andrew M Gudgeon; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Byung Ho Nam; Sohee Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Eui Kyu Chie; Sun Young Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  N K Francis; N J Curtis; J A Conti; J D Foster; H J Bonjer; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.

Authors:  D S Keller; J Qiu; R P Kiran
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  J D Foster; D Miskovic; A S Allison; J A Conti; J Ockrim; E J Cooper; G B Hanna; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Supporting laparoscopic general surgery training with digital technology: The United Kingdom and Ireland paradigm.

Authors:  Gemma Humm; Rhiannon L Harries; Danail Stoyanov; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.