Literature DB >> 24837215

Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Seung-Yong Jeong1, Ji Won Park1, Byung Ho Nam2, Sohee Kim2, Sung-Bum Kang3, Seok-Byung Lim4, Hyo Seong Choi5, Duck-Woo Kim3, Hee Jin Chang5, Dae Yong Kim5, Kyung Hae Jung6, Tae-You Kim7, Gyeong Hoon Kang8, Eui Kyu Chie9, Sun Young Kim5, Dae Kyung Sohn5, Dae-Hyun Kim5, Jae-Sung Kim10, Hye Seung Lee11, Jee Hyun Kim12, Jae Hwan Oh13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with open resection, laparoscopic resection of rectal cancers is associated with improved short-term outcomes, but high-level evidence showing similar long-term outcomes is scarce. We aimed to compare survival outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for patients with mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer.
METHODS: The Comparison of Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low REctal cancer After Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN) trial was an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial done between April 4, 2006, and Aug 26, 2009, at three centres in Korea. Patients (aged 18-80 years) with cT3N0-2M0 mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either open or laparoscopic surgery. Randomisation was stratified by sex and preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence; patients and clinicians were not masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3 year disease-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 15%. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00470951.
FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 340 patients to receive either open surgery (n=170) or laparoscopic surgery (n=170). 3 year disease-free survival was 72·5% (95% CI 65·0-78·6) for the open surgery group and 79·2% (72·3-84·6) for the laparoscopic surgery group, with a difference that was lower than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (-6·7%, 95% CI -15·8 to 2·4; p<0·0001). 25 (15%) patients died in the open group and 20 (12%) died in the laparoscopic group. No deaths were treatment related.
INTERPRETATION: Our results show that laparoscopic resection for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy provides similar outcomes for disease-free survival as open resection, thus justifying its use. FUNDING: National Cancer Center, South Korea.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24837215     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  257 in total

1.  Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.

Authors:  John S Mayo; Miriam L Brazer; Kenneth J Bogenberger; Kelli B Tavares; Robert J Conrad; Michael B Lustik; Suzanne M Gillern; Chan W Park; Carly R Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Liang Kang; Wen-Hao Chen; Shuang-Ling Luo; Yan-Xin Luo; Zhi-Hua Liu; Mei-Jin Huang; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The feasibility of laparoscopic extended pelvic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hayato Nakamura; Keisuke Uehara; Atsuki Arimoto; Takehiro Kato; Tomoki Ebata; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Jia-Cheng Shen; Jing Zhang; Tao Jiang; Wei-Dong Wu; Jun Cao; Ke-Jian Huang; Zheng-Jun Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.

Authors:  Kinuko Nagayoshi; Takashi Ueki; Tatsuya Manabe; Taiki Moriyama; Kosuke Yanai; Yoshinao Oda; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Total Mesorectal Excision Technique-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joep Knol; Deborah S Keller
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-04-28

8.  Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishikawa; Soichiro Ishihara; Keisuke Hata; Koji Murono; Koji Yasuda; Kensuke Otani; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Kazushige Kawai; Hiroaki Nozawa; Hironori Yamaguchi; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Effect of Visceral Obesity on Surgical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Ji Won Park; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?

Authors:  E Duchalais; N Machairas; S R Kelley; R G Landmann; A Merchea; D T Colibaseanu; K L Mathis; E J Dozois; D W Larson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.