Literature DB >> 20182721

Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Sudip K Sarker1, Isis Kumar, Conor Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Competent technical skills performance in complex operations is vital for satisfactory patient outcome. Assessing these skills is therefore of paramount importance. In this study we aim to develop and validate a new tool that can assess both generic and specific technical skills in advanced complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the operating room.
METHODS: Hierarchical task analysis was constructed for generic and specific technical skills on three key advanced laparoscopic colorectal operations (right hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, and anterior resection) after expert discussions. Likert scales were then constructed individually for generic and specific technical skills for each operation using hierarchical task analysis for each operation to identify key elements and steps for each operation. Each operation was assessed independently and blindly by two experienced surgeons.
RESULTS: Eighty-four live real operations performed by six consultants and eight trainees were assessed. Interclass correlation coefficient between the two observers was 0.94 (P < or = 0.05) for generic technical skills and 0.88 (P < or = 0.05) for the operation-specific technical skills. Construct validity for both generic and specific technical skills for consultants and trainees was significant using ANOVA (P < or = 0.05). All consultants therefore consistently performed better in both generic and specific technical skills compared to their trainees.
CONCLUSIONS: This new assessment tool of generic and specific technical skills in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reliable and has face, content, concurrent, and construct validities. The tool has the possibility of being used as a surgical training and appraisal tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182721     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0486-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  29 in total

1.  Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

Authors:  C Vincent; G Neale; M Woloshynowych
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

2.  Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquistion of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator.

Authors:  James D Watterson; Darren T Beiko; James K Kuan; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills.

Authors:  D Dath; G Regehr; D Birch; C Schlachta; E Poulin; J Mamazza; R Reznick; H M MacRae
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman; Christopher G Andrew; Simon Bergman; Karen Leffondré; Donna Stanbridge; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; F Bello; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.

Authors:  S K Sarker; R Hutchinson; A Chang; C Vincent; A W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Objective assessment of temporal bone drilling skills.

Authors:  Molly Zirkle; Michael A Taplin; Richard Anthony; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an assessment and self-appraisal tool.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Tark Albrani; Atiquaz Zaman; Bijen Patel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Teaching and testing technical skills.

Authors:  R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

View more
  9 in total

1.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  N J Curtis; J Davids; J D Foster; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Simulation and its role in training.

Authors:  Hoda Samia; Sadaf Khan; Justin Lawrence; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

4.  Short-duration virtual reality simulation training positively impacts performance during laparoscopic colectomy in animal model: results of a single-blinded randomized trial : VR warm-up for laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Sergio E A Araujo; Conor P Delaney; Victor E Seid; Antonio R Imperiale; Alexandre B Bertoncini; Sergio C Nahas; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Susannah M Wyles; Fiona Carter; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Sophie Knight; Rajesh Aggarwal; Aubert Agostini; Anderson Loundou; Stéphane Berdah; Patrice Crochet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Objective assessment of technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: what are the existing tools?

Authors:  J D Foster; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  How can surgical skills in laparoscopic colon surgery be objectively assessed?-a scoping review.

Authors:  Tora Rydtun Haug; Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft; Danilo Miskovic; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Anders Husted Madsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Development of a rating scale for objective assessment of performance in laparoscopic appendicectomy surgery.

Authors:  Pramudith Sirimanna; Stephen Boyce; Prashanth Gunanayagam; Marc A Gladman; Vasi Naganathan
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.025

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.