Hang Kuen Lau1, Kristi L Kiick. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering and ‡Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware , Newark Delaware 19716, United States.
Abstract
Hydrogels provide mechanical support and a hydrated environment that offer good cytocompatibility and controlled release of molecules, and myriad hydrogels thus have been studied for biomedical applications. In the past few decades, research in these areas has shifted increasingly to multicomponent hydrogels that better capture the multifunctional nature of native biological environments and that offer opportunities to selectively tailor materials properties. This review summarizes recent approaches aimed at producing multicomponent hydrogels, with descriptions of contemporary chemical and physical approaches for forming networks, and of the use of both synthetic and biologically derived molecules to impart desired properties. Specific multicomponent materials with enhanced mechanical properties are presented, as well as materials in which multiple biological functions are imparted for applications in tissue engineering, cancer treatment, and gene therapies. The progress in the field suggests significant promise for these approaches in the development of biomedically relevant materials.
Hydrogels provide mechanical support and a hydrated environment that offer good cytocompatibility and controlled release of molecules, and myriad hydrogels thus have been studied for biomedical applications. In the past few decades, research in these areas has shifted increasingly to multicomponent hydrogels that better capture the multifunctional nature of native biological environments and that offer opportunities to selectively tailor materials properties. This review summarizes recent approaches aimed at producing multicomponent hydrogels, with descriptions of contemporary chemical and physical approaches for forming networks, and of the use of both synthetic and biologically derived molecules to impart desired properties. Specific multicomponent materials with enhanced mechanical properties are presented, as well as materials in which multiple biological functions are imparted for applications in tissue engineering, cancer treatment, and gene therapies. The progress in the field suggests significant promise for these approaches in the development of biomedically relevant materials.
Three-dimensional
(3D) hydrogel networks provide mechanical support
and hydrophilic properties that are advantageous for myriad applications
ranging from those in consumer to biomedical products. The highly
porous structure allows for fast diffusion of small molecules,[1] and hydrogels thus have been used in separation
and purification,[2] biosensor,[3−5] and tissue regeneration.[6−8] Hydrogels provide a hydrated environment
for cells, which improves their suitability for tissue engineering
applications.[8−10] For tissue engineering purposes, hydrogels not only
need to provide a physical support for cell growth, but also need
to maintain a mechanically active and biochemically appropriate environment
that provide cell–matrix interactions to direct cell proliferation
and differentiation. Given the variety of properties necessary for
optimizing material activity in the biological environment, multicomponent
hybrid hydrogels have been of significant research interest.The formation of a multicomponent hybrid network can be achieved
via either chemical or physical means. Many biologically active proteins
or peptides can simply be reacted with synthetic polymers via radical
polymerization or other conjugation strategies, including click protocols,[11−13] yielding multiple opportunities to easily produce multicomponent
hydrogels. In particular, highly specific click reactions provide
a simple way to produce macromolecules or hydrogel networks with a
controllable network structure and patternable design. The nontoxic
and mild chemistries enable cell encapsulation and provide opportunities
for hydrogel formation in vivo. In addition, the use of physical networks,
including those formed from self-assembling peptides and proteins,
has expanded the versatility of these physical approaches for producing
self-assembling hydrogels.[14−16]Both synthetic and natural
polymers have been utilized for fabricating
scaffolds. For biological application, the materials must be inherently
biocompatible, biodegradable, and cell adhesive. Additionally, they
must have a porous, mechanically stable, and 3D structure with facile
manufacture. Synthetic materials provide a wide range of molecular
structures and chemical capability,[7,17] while biomimetic
materials, and in particular structural proteins such as collagen
and elastin, provide mechanical characteristics unique to native tissue.[18,19] Hybrid polymeric scaffolds combining natural and synthetic polymers
have thus gathered significant and continued interest for their potential
to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). In addition, to further improve
the mechanical robustness of the hydrogel network, composite hybrid
hydrogels provide an additional mechanical reinforcement.[20−22] Drug delivery can also be enhanced when a second phase, such as
drug-loaded nanoparticles and microparticles, is incorporated in the
hydrogel matrix.[23,24]For most of the biochemically
inert polymers, the lack of interaction
between cells and hydrogels can limit the utility of the materials
for directing cellular behavior, and accordingly, the purposeful design
and production of multicomponent hydrogels to fulfill different biological
function has grown.[6,10,19,25−27] In addition to providing
cell adhesion and cell-mediated degradation, incorporation of biofunctional
biomolecules, including growth factors[28−31] and signaling molecules[17,32,33] can also facilitate cell proliferation
and differentiation. Controlled delivery of biomolecules to modulate
immune response,[34−36] with codelivery of therapeutics and DNA, can further
expand the functions of hydrogels beyond tissue regeneration to cancer
and gene therapies.[37−39] The applications of these tunable hydrogels in biomedical
engineering are numerous, owing to the ease by which functions can
be altered by simple incorporation of the components that are required
for particular applications. This review focuses on the recent development
and applications of multicomponent hybrid hydrogels.
Hydrogel Network Formation
Chemical Hydrogels
Stable hydrogel
networks are essential to provide structural support, and can be formed
by chemical and physical cross-linking; given the wide selection of
cross-linking methods available, multiple components can be randomly
or selectively incorporated into the hydrogel networks. Chemically
cross-linked hydrogel networks, employing covalent bonds, generally
provide a stronger and more stable network, although chemical degradation
or other strategies are then necessary for elimination of the hydrogels
from a biological environment. Covalently cross-linked hydrogels can
be formed via various reactions, including free radical polymerization,[40−42] click chemistry,[12,43−45] and thiol–ene
chemistry.[46−48] The advantage of radical polymerization is that multiple,
vinyl-functionalized components can react and form multicomponent
hybrid hydrogels, such as poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA)/gelatin
methacrylate (GelMA)[49] and poly(ethylene
glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA)/ heparin methacrylate (HepMA)[50] in a one-pot reaction. Incorporating bioactive
components (e.g., gelatin and heparin) in the matrix imparts desired
bioactivity while maintaining necessary mechanical strength. Prepolymerization
of the precursor solution before inclusion of cells can reduce free-radical
induced cell damage during in situ cell encapsulation,[51,52] and there are multiple types of photoinitiators (such as Igracure
2959[53] and lithium arylphosphinate (LAP)[54,55]) that maintain high cell viability, and conditions can be employed
to make free radical polymerization useful for forming hybrid hydrogels
in vivo.[56]In addition to free radical
polymerization, controlled radical polymerization (CRP), including
atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)[57−59] and reversible
addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT),[60−63] have been employed for the formation
of hybrid materials and to afford better control over molecular weight,
polymer architecture, and controllable incorporation of multiple macromolecules.
ATRP polymerizations can be initiated by a chemically functionalized[64] or genetically encoded[65] initiator(s); the ability to control polymer conjugation with biomolecules
is of great interest for producing polymer–peptide and polymer–protein
hybrid materials that show stimuli-responsive behavior. In addition,
ATRP has permitted the controlled growth of polymers from micropatterned
surfaces,[66] particles,[41] and biomolecules[64,65] and has been useful
for production of polymer–drug or polymer–protein conjugates.
Hydrogels synthesized via CRP show a more homogeneous and ordered
network in comparison to networks formed via free radical polymerization,
which has been important for providing better control of swelling
and deswelling kinetics,[67] degradation,[60,62] and drug release.[59,63] However, given the toxicity of
the commonly employed copper- and iron-based catalysts, the materials
generally require an extensive purification process prior to use in
biomedical applications, including chromatography, precipitation,
and dialysis.[68] RAFT polymerizations, in
contrast, employ chain transfer agents to control the polymerization
and thus do not require a special initiator or metal catalyst.[40]Click chemistry has been widely used in
conjugation due to its
fast, highly specific, and efficient reaction, which allows selective
modification and incorporation of biologically active molecules (such
as cell adhesion and enzymatically degradable peptides) in specific
sites, even in the presence of various functional groups and under
physiological conditions.[11,69] Hydrogels utilizing
click chemistry have a well-defined network structure and can show
significantly improved mechanical properties.[70] The most commonly used click reactions include alkyne–azide,
Diels–Alder, and thiol–ene reactions. The popular copper-catalyzed
alkyne–azide cycloaddition (CuAAC), which is stable in biological
systems, has been widely used in bioconjugation.[71−73] To reduce the
cytotoxicity of the copper catalyst in biological studies,[11] copper-free click chemistries[74−77] have been developed that can
be readily employed in the presence of cells.[74,75] The Diels–Alder cycoladdition reaction, between a conjugated
diene and a substituted alkene to form a substituted cyclohexene,
is also widely used in hydrogel formation[78] and offers the advantage of not requiring an initiator. The reaction
is noncytotoxic and maintains cell viability during cell encapsulation,[79] but the slow rate of the Diels–Alder
chemistry has limited its use for hydrogel systems that require rapid
gelation. The development of a fast inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder
reaction, which involves the reaction of a trans-cyclooctene
with a tetrazine,[80] yields reactions with
highly rapid rates and the maintenance of cell viability,[45] which has enabled its use for fluorescent labeling
of cell surfaces and intracellular labeling of living mammalian cells.[81] The Diels–Alder click reaction provides
not only a cross-linking chemistry, but also uses imaging agents for
live-cell imaging because of its cytocompatibility. Another widely
employed class of click reactions, thiol–ene reactions, can
proceed via a traditional Michael-type addition or be mediated by
radicals and has the advantage of rapid and efficient reaction and
the ability to react under ambient conditions. In addition, the availability
of a wide variety of thiols, including alkyl thiols, thiophenols,
thiol propionate, and thiolglycolates, enables its wide applications
in chemical reactions, bioconjugation, surface modification, hydrogel
formation, and photopatterning.[47] The radical-mediated
thiol–ene reaction requires radical initiation, that is, thermal
or photolytic, for activation of the thiyl radical that reacts with
a broad range of alkenes via a combination of step and chain growth
mechanisms.[47,71] It shows faster gelation and
higher cross-linking density compared to the Michael-type addition,[55] and because of the UV initiation, radical thiol–ene
can be controlled and triggered spatiotemporally,[82] allowing its use in 2D and 3D photopatterning.[44,74,76] For example, hydrogels produced
with a cross-linker containing available alkyl sulfide functional
groups were able to undergo reversible exchange of thiolated biomolecules
with photopatterning techniques.[83] The
unique exchangeable functional groups thus provide dynamic control
of hydrogel function.[84]
Physical Hydrogels
Physical hydrogels,
in contrast, are formed by secondary interactions, including hydrogen
bonding, ionic interactions, and hydrophobic interactions.[85] Cooperative physical interactions can be used
to form stable hydrogels via crystallization, self-assembly, and thermally
induced cross-linking. Although secondary interactions can provide
stable hydrogels, the strength of the physical network can be altered
by pH, temperature, or organic solvent.[86−88] Specific ligand–receptor
binding events and self-assembling peptides also can be employed to
form physical hydrogels, permitting the elimination of any potential
toxic cross-linker or initiator. Although physical gels may suffer
from weak mechanical properties and dissociation from the bulk material,
physical cross-links formed via multiple methods have been shown to
be valuable in the production of multicomponent hydrogels.[89−91]One common strategy for the formation of physically cross-linked
polymeric gels is through the crystallization of the polymer. Poly(vinyl
alcohol) (PVA), in particular, is one of the most widely used polymer
hydrogels cross-linked via crystallization induced in a freeze–thawing
process.[7] The mechanical and swelling properties
of these types of hydrogels depend on the crystallinity, which can
be well controlled by the processing conditions. Repeated freeze–thawing
can improve mechanical properties through the formation of secondary
crystallites,[92] and the resulting gels
are highly elastic and stable at room temperature,[92,93] showing consistent compression moduli values after repeated cycles.[93] Besides PVA, block copolymers that contains
semicrystalline polymer domains can also form crystallite-cross-linked
networks. Semicrystalline polymers including poly(caprolactone) (PCL)
and poly(lactide) (PLA) have been used to form amphiphilic block copolymers,
such as PCL–PEG–PCL and PLA–PEO–PLA.[94,95] Heating and cooling cycles induce crystallization of the crystalline
block to create a hydrogel network with properties that can be varied
by processing to control the crystallinity.Spontaneous self-assembly,
generally driven from cooperative physical
interactions,[96] has also been widely used
in the formation of physical networks. A large range of biomacromolecules,
including peptides and proteins can form network structures via formation
of coiled-coil, triple helix, and β-sheet structures; canonical
examples include collagen-based[97−100] and silk-based[101−103] hydrogels. Peptide sequences that form self-assembled structures
have thus been incorporated into hybrid hydrogels. For example, the
peptide sequence (AKAAAKA)2 has been conjugated to Pluronic
polymers to form a self-assembled peptide/polymer hybrid hydrogel[104,105] that showed a compressive modulus similar to that of native elastin
and was capable of supporting cell adhesion. Another approach for
synthesizing peptide/polymer hybrids is via polymerization. Functionalized
poly-l-glutamate (alkyl-poly-l-EG2Glu)
has been produced via ring opening polymerization of the γ-(2-methoxyethoxy)esteryl-l-glutamate N-carboxyanhydride (l-EG2GluNCA) with alkyl amine; the resulting alkyl polypeptide
can spontaneously self-assemble into a hydrogel.[106] The alkyl polypeptide with V3A3E3(CO2H) and alkyl end can be self-assembled into
aligned hydrogel nanofibers.[107] For further
details on self-assembling protein and peptide–polymer hybrid
hydrogels, the reader is directed to a recent review.[15]Thermally responsive polymers, such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
(PNIPAAm), have also been employed in self-assembly and the formation
of injectable materials for biomedical and drug delivery applications.[8] Many peptides and proteins conjugated to PNIPAAm
exhibit materials with dual self-assembly and thermally responsive
properties.[108−111] In one example, hydrogels have been produced via the interactions
of coiled-coil domains of PNIPAAm–coiled-coil polypeptide–PNIPAAm
triblock polymers. Below the LCST of the PNIPAAm, the hydrogel is
only cross-linked by the coiled-coil interactions of the polypeptide
(Figure 1) and thus exhibits shear-thinning
behavior, which is useful for injection. With an increase of temperature
to above 37 °C (e.g., upon injection in vivo), the thermally
responsive PNIPAAm segments collapse and aggregate, resulting in a
stiff hydrogel with a modulus up to 60 kPa.[110] In another example, conjugation of a DNA-binding protein to PNIPAAm
was employed to form a biofunctional hydrogel,[112] permitting the production of materials that retain the
ability to bind specific DNA. The ability to incorporate biomolecules
with specific binding properties within the functional hydrogel has
also enabled simplified separation and purification of DNA and proteins.
Figure 1
PNIPAAm–coiled-coil
peptide–PNIPAAm thermally responsive
self-assembled hydrogel. (a) The hydrogel is cross-linked by the coiled-coil
structure formed by the polypeptide and by PNIPAAm after its collapse
and aggregation above its LCST. (b) Schematic of PNIPAAm–coiled-coil
peptide–PNIPAAm and peptide sequence.[110] Reproduced with permission from ref (110). Copyright 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
PNIPAAm–coiled-coil
peptide–PNIPAAm thermally responsive
self-assembled hydrogel. (a) The hydrogel is cross-linked by the coiled-coil
structure formed by the polypeptide and by PNIPAAm after its collapse
and aggregation above its LCST. (b) Schematic of PNIPAAm–coiled-coil
peptide–PNIPAAm and peptide sequence.[110] Reproduced with permission from ref (110). Copyright 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Mechanical Improvement
Hybrid
Networks
The versatility of
polymer synthesis and modification enables the production of synthetic
polymers in different molecular structures, including star and branched
polymers and multiple networks. The widely employed tetra-functionalized
PEG has been useful for forming hydrogel networks;[25,72,113−117] tetra-PEG hydrogels have become popular
owing to their simple, robust, and versatile chemistries.[118] The networks have demonstrated improvements
in extension and strength compared with conventional hydrogels,[119] and more recent reports have shown that there
are negligible local defects so that the networks produced from the
tetra-PEGs act as a nearly ideal elastic network.[120] In another example, a reducible micelle hydrogel has been
formed, using a multiarm PEG-containing copolymer, for drug delivery
applications. The 8-arm PCL–PEOcopolymer was linked by a disulfide
core and exhibited a micellar structure;[121] the micelles then further cross-linked to form hydrogels. Micelle
size could be reduced in the presence of a reducing agent, which cleaved
the disulfide core linkage and reduced the sizes of the multiarm polymer
by half (to yield a 4-arm architecture). The mechanical strength of
the 8-arm hydrogel was nearly 10-fold that of a control hydrogel formed
with a cross-linked linear copolymer, and the modulus of the 8-arm
micellar hydrogel was decreased 58% when the multiarm polymer was
reduced to the 4-arm polymer.In addition to these variations
in polymer architecture, hybrid networks formed with two different
polymers have been shown to exhibit excellent mechanical properties.
Interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs), for example, are among the
earliest multicomponent, hybrid polymer networks; the concept of IPNs
was introduced in the 1960s and remains an active research area.[122] Double networks are one unique type of IPN
system that contains two types of polymers with an asymmetric network
structure[123] (Figure 2) and has provided significant improvement in the strength of hydrogels
compared to that of single networks.[124−127] A double poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic
acid) (PAMPS)/polyacrylamide (PAAm) network hydrogel, formed via a
two-step polymerization, has improved the compressive strength of
the hydrogel over 20 times relative to PAMPS and PAAm single network
hydrogels while retaining highly elastomeric behavior.[127] Other groups have combined biopolymers such
as gelatin and bacterial cellulose (BC) to form double network hydrogels
with high mechanical strength (up to 5 MPa in compression),[126] or PVA/PAAm materials for load-bearing cartilage
substitution.[128]
Figure 2
PAMPS and PAAm networks
of the double network hydrogel under tensile
test. The highly cross-linked PAMPS network fractured, while loosely
cross-linked PAAm network was still holding the gel stucture during
extension.[123] Reproduced with permission
from ref (123). Copyright
2010 The Royal Society of Chemistry; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2010/SM/b924290b#!divAbstract.
PAMPS and PAAm networks
of the double network hydrogel under tensile
test. The highly cross-linked PAMPS network fractured, while loosely
cross-linked PAAm network was still holding the gel stucture during
extension.[123] Reproduced with permission
from ref (123). Copyright
2010 The Royal Society of Chemistry; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2010/SM/b924290b#!divAbstract.
Mimics
of Natural Proteins
Natural
hydrogels, including proteins and polysaccharides, have been used
in biological applications and tissue engineering due to their biocompatibility,
biodegradability, and biological functions.[17] Natural polymers, such as alginate,[129] chitosan,[130,131] gelatin,[99,132,133] and elastin[134,135] are able to form physical hydrogels but often have poor mechanical
properties.[9] However, modification of natural
polymers is often more difficult, with fewer chemical options compared
to those available with synthetic polymers, and the purification of
natural polymers often suffers from batch-to-batch variability. In
addition, natural polymers extracted from animals or bacteria raise
concerns about immunogenic reactions.[118] A recent review includes details regarding polysaccharide-based
hydrogels for tissue engineering applications;[136] we include here descriptions of protein-based hydrogels
based on recombinant polypeptides[137] for
tissue engineering applications.
Elastin
Elastin
is one of the most
important structural proteins in mammals, providing the elastomeric
behavior of most tissues, including tendons and blood vessels.[138] The canonical amino acid sequence that gives
rise to the mechanical properties of elastin is the flexible VPGXG
repeat, where X can be any natural amino acid except proline. Recombinant
methods have enabled the development of an enormous variety of biosynthetic
elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs).[19,134,135,139−144]The inverse transition behavior of elastin, in which ELP forms
coacervates above a critical transition temperature, has been widely
studied as a function of pH, salt concentration, and temperature.[145] The transition temperature can be tuned by
variations in the amino acid sequence, where the addition of hydrophobic
residues reduces the transition temperature.[146] ELP nanoparticles have been produced to encapsulate and release
bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) for potential protein and drug delivery
applications.[147] With the advantages of
ELPs, they have been incorporated into multicomponent materials (both
chemically and physically cross-linked) to enhance both the mechanical
and biological functions.[148] Multiblockelastin polypeptides containing the hydrophobic IPAVG end block for
physical cross-linking have shown high extension and tensile strength.[148]To further improve the biological properties
of ELPs, various cell
adhesion peptide and degradation domains have been added to the ELP
sequences to improve cell adhesion, spreading, and migration.[149] An RGD peptide was incorporated on the surface
of a multiblockELP gel via maleimide–thiol chemistry to promote
luminal endothelialization in vascular grafts;[134] the surface-specific conjugation enhanced the adhesion
and proliferation of both endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells.
Other groups have taken advantage of the reversible, thermally responsive
behavior of ELPs to form low-concentration, injectable hydrogels that
can be cross-linked via disulfide bonding of cysteine residues in
vivo.[150] It has been possible to predict
and tune the inverse transition temperature of a wide range of ELPs
via sequence design.[90,142,143,151−153]In addition to hydrogel matrix materials, ELPs also can form
nanoparticles
and nanofibers. Silk-elastinmultiblock polypeptides can self-assemble
into nanoparticles with the silk block in the core.[103] Nanoparticles have also been formed from the elastin–mimetic
hybrid copolymer PAA-VPGVG;[154] in this
particular case, the nanoparticles were formed by collective hydrogen
binding and hydrophobic interactions, rather than by coacervation
of the elastin-like domains, and are of interest in drug delivery
applications. ELP electrospun fibers, cross-linked with glutaraldehyde
in a vapor-initiated process and then rehydrated in NaCl buffer,[155] have provided opportunities for the use of
hydrogel fibers to guide cell direction and to mimic the orientations
of cells in native tissue. The opportunities for employing ELPs in
biomedical fields continue to expand, not only as a result of the
mechanical properties that are comparable to those of native elastin,
but also due to the responsive behavior of ELPs, which makes them
highly versatile for drug delivery applications.
Resilin
Resilin is another structural
protein, found in insects, where it is located primarily in active
ligament and tendons.[156] The excellent
resilience and energy storage allows resilin to recover from repetitive
high-strain cyclic loading with essentially no hysteresis, even under
high frequency conditions, which has an important role in insect flight
and jumping[157] and in sound production.[158] Repetitive constructs of the consensus sequence
of resilin from D. melanogaster (GGRPSDSYGAPGGGN)
have been produced from the first exon of the DrosophilaCG15920 gene via recombinant methods, and the polypeptide showed
excellent mechanical properties comparable to those of native resilin.[159] The unique resilience of cross-linked resilin-like
polypeptide (RLP) and hybrid RLP hydrogels has motivated their use
in applications requiring highly elastomeric and biomechanical functions,
such as vocal fold therapeutics,[160] artificial
muscles,[161] and cardiovascular applications.[162] The RLPs show pH- and temperature-responsive
behavior related to that of ELPs, although in addition to the inverse
transition temperature, select RLPs can show dual phase transitions
with both upper and lower solution critical temperatures.[163]To improve the biological functionality
of the RLP, our group has produced multiple constructs that incorporate
cell adhesion domains (RGD), enzymatic degradation domains (MMP-sensitive),
and heparin-binding domains (HBD) to yield a multibiofunctional material
(Figure 3).[160,164−167] RLP-based hydrogels can be cross-linked by the reaction of amines
in the RLP sequence (Lys) with the small-molecule cross-linker tris(hydroxymethyl
phosphine) propionic acid (THPP) or tris(hydroxymethyl phosphine)
(THP). Hydrogels formed by these methods exhibited excellent mechanical
properties characteristic of resilin, while improving cell adhesion
and cell-mediated degradation. In studies from other groups, the bone
morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) peptide has been incorporated into
RLP films derived from A. gambiae;
the resulting surfaces promoted osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal
stem cells.[168]
Figure 3
Resilin-like polypeptide
hydrogels demonstrate useful mechanical
properties and biological functions.[160] Reproduced with permission from ref (160). Copyright 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2013/SM/c2sm26812d#!divAbstract.
Resilin-like polypeptide
hydrogels demonstrate useful mechanical
properties and biological functions.[160] Reproduced with permission from ref (160). Copyright 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2013/SM/c2sm26812d#!divAbstract.Other recombinant constructs have
combined the properties of multiple
structural proteins into a hybrid resilin-elastin-collagen (REC) polypeptide.[18] This polypeptide self-assembles into fibrous
structures via the interactions of collagen, yield materials with
a Young’s modulus between 0.1 and 3 MPa, consistent with those
observed for native resilins and elastins. In a related example, the
well-characterized GB1 domain was combined with random-coil resilin-like
domains to produce multiblock mimics of the passive elastic muscle
protein titin.[161] The material showed high
resilience at low strain and was durable at high strain, consistent
with the observed properties of muscle.We have also explored
hybrid RLP materials produced with synthetic
polymers as matrices for cardiovascular tissue engineering.[162] The RLP was synthesized via biosynthetic methods
and contained the RGD integrin-binding domain, MMP degradation domain,
and heparin-binding domains of the sequences described above. Four-arm
vinyl sulfone-terminated PEG was reacted with the cysteine-containing
RLP via Michael-type addition. The resulting hybrid hydrogel maintained
the mechanically active and biologically active domains, and supported
the spreading of AoAFs during in vivo culture to a significantly greater
extent than RLP-only hydrogels. Incorporating RLP and PEG together
provides the mechanically durable and resilient hydrogel, with improved
cell interactions, that may be useful in the engineering of mechanically
active tissues.
Composite Matrices for Mechanical
Reinforcement
Conventional hydrogels often exhibit weak mechanical
strength and
poor deformation (e.g., gels from gelatin and agarose),[120] and increasing cross-linking density has been
a common method for improving mechanical properties both natural and
synthetic polymeric hydrogels.[7] However,
high cross-linking density results in restriction of the chains which
yields stiff materials with limited extensibility and reduced water
content in the swelled state,[85] as well
as compromised permeability and slow molecular diffusion.[169] Composite hydrogels have thus been investigated
as a strategy for improving the mechanical strength of hydrogel-based
materials.[170] These strategies employ traditional
composite approaches in which a filler is either physically entrapped
or chemically cross-linked within the hydrogel matrix to produce materials
with increased mechanical strength. Mechanically stiff fillers, such
as nanoclays, in the composite networks serve as reinforcement and
as a multipoint cross-linker to improve the mechanical strength of
the composite hydrogel, obviating the requirement for a high network
density.[171] The reorientation of the filler
and polymeric network then serves to maintain the high elasticity
of the hydrogel. In one example, nanocomposite hydrogels utilized
exfoliated nanoclay to reinforce a PNIPAAm hydrogel; these materials
showed both excellent mechanical strength (up to 1000 kPa) and high
elasticity (up to 1000% strain-to-break).[172−174] Composite hydrogels have since been produced to incorporate a broader
scope of inorganic species including silica nanoparticles (SiNPs),[175−177] metal nanoparticles,[170,178] hydroxyapatite,[22,29,179] carbon nanotubes (CNTs),[180] and graphene oxide (GO) sheets[181] as reinforcement. Although the strength and
modulus of these organic–inorganic systems is significantly
improved with the addition of the inorganic matrix, leaching of the
inorganic species is a concern. In recent decades, the development
of organic nanocrystals, organic particles, and electrospun polymer
fibers have provided alternatives that avoid the need for the inorganic
filler.
Nanocrystal-Reinforced Matrices
Polysaccharide
nanocrystals, formed primarily by crystal-forming cellulose and chitin,
have been utilized to replace inorganic filler in nanoparticle-reinforced
hydrogels.[21] The rod-like nanocrystals,
also referred to as nanowhiskers, can be extracted from natural materials;
cellulose nanocrystals are often extracted from cotton or ramie, and
chitin nanocrystals are extracted from shrimp or crab.[182,183] These nanocrystals have the advantage of being biocompatible and
biodegradable, as well as having mechanical strength and moduli that
are comparable to those of inorganic fillers (over 100 GPa).[182] Different groups have incorporated cellulose
nanocrystals (CNC) or chitins as reinforcement fillers for PAAm,[184,185] PVA,[186] chitosan,[187] and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)/hydroxyethylcellulose
(HEC)[188] hydrogels. The mechanical properties
of the composite hydrogels generally increase with increased nanocrystal
content.CNCs have also been used, in electrospinning of PEO,
to reinforce the resulting nanofibers;[189] the composite nanofibers showed an increased modulus (38 MPa) compared
to that of PEO fiber (15 MPa), and these properties depended on the
CNC content. CNC-reinforced, injectable hydrogel comprising a carboxymethyl
cellulose and dextran matrix have also been produced;[21] chemically cross-linked, CNC-reinforced hydrogels showed
a higher modulus compared to physically blended CNC hydrogels. The
development of such polysaccharidenanocrystal composites has provided
biocompatible and biodegradable fillers, which has enabled the use
of nanocrystal composite hydrogels in tissue engineering. However,
the sizes of the nanocrystals are limited in scope due to their extraction
from naturally occurring materials; thus, the options for engineering
properties by altering filler dimensions is also limited.
Particle-Reinforced Matrices
In addition
to nanocrystal-containing composite hydrogels, synthetic organic nanoparticles
and microparticles also have been incorporated into hydrogels for
mechanical reinforcement. For example, the uniform dispersion of monodisperse
cationic polystyrene (c-PS) nanoparticles into a PAAm hydrogel improved
the compression strength to 40 MPa compared to the original 70 kPa
modulus of a PAAm-only hydrogel.[190] The
improvement in mechanical properties was attributed to the uniform
dispersion of monodisperse c-PS that were prefabricated by emulsion
polymerization. Another group incorporated the thermoresponsive PNIPAAm
microgels into the PAAm matrix and evaluated the mechanical properties
below and above the LCST of the PNIPAAm that led to understanding
the effect of soft and hard filler on the hydrogel.[191] An advantage of the synthetic organic particles in the
composite hydrogel is that they can be used not only reinforce the
mechanical properties, but can also serve as a vehicle for drug and/or
protein delivery. The incorporation of block copolymer micelles (BCMs)
in PAAm hydrogels via free radical polymerization resulted in hydrogels
that sustain significant elongation (up to 480%),[192] and that could also be loaded with hydrophobic drugs (via
loading of the hydrophobic core of the BCMs during micelle formation)
to permit drug delivery upon mechanical deformation of the hydrogel.
Other organic nanoparticles, including hyperbranched polymers,[193] polymeric nanoparticles,[190,194] micelles,[192] and nanogels,[178,195,196] have also been used in the production
of composite hydrogels for controllable drug delivery. For example,
hyperbranched polyester (HPE) hydrogels enabled the entrapment of
the hydrophobic drug dexamethasone acetate within the HPE hydrophobic
cavities without causing drug aggregation and showed longer sustained
release compared to drug encapsulated in a PEG hydrogel.[193] The drug-loaded nanoparticle composite hydrogel
was able to achieve sustained release and a high drug concentration
for local delivery,[172] and drug delivery
could also be triggered with stimuli such as temperature or mechanical
deformation.[196]Composite hydrogels
are not limited to those formed with nanoparticles; microgel hydrogels
have also been shown to improve strength and torsion resistance. Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic
sodium) (PNaAMPS) microgel-reinforced PAAm double-network hydrogel
films have shown high tensile strength (up to 2.6 MPa with a strain
up to approximately 10%; Figure 4).[197] Preformed microgels were incorporated into
a PAAm hydrogel to form two-phase composite materials. The additional
PAAm double network resulted in even greater mechanical enhancement
compared to microgel-reinforced single-network hydrogels (e.g., a
modulus of nearly 120 kPa compared to the modulus of the reinforced
single network of approximately 50 kPa).[198]
Figure 4
Microgel-reinforced
double network PAAm hydrogel that exhibited
excellent extension (a) and torsion (b). Microgel before tensile deformation
(c) and after deformation (d).[197] Reproduced
with permission from ref (197). Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Microgel-reinforced
double network PAAm hydrogel that exhibited
excellent extension (a) and torsion (b). Microgel before tensile deformation
(c) and after deformation (d).[197] Reproduced
with permission from ref (197). Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.Nanoparticles and microparticles can be fabricated
via various
methods, including emulsion polymerization,[60,190,199,200] self-assembly,[103,145,147] and phase separation.[201−203] In one example, 8-arm PEG has
been used to form PEG microspheres via phase-separation in aqueous
media.[201−203] The PEG microspheres could be cross-linked
via the reaction of amines with vinyl sulfone or with acrylate, and
the sizes of the microspheres were controllable in different media,
with improved cell viability in a microsphere-based scaffold.[201] Compared to microspheres formed via emulsion
polymerization, these microspheres do not require extensive solvent
exchange or washing to remove organic solvent, although the reaction
conditions needed to be precisely controlled to prevent bulk gel gelation.
Improved control over the reaction kinetics and changes in particle
sizes over time will enable better control of the microspheres and
properties of the resulting matrices.
Fiber-Reinforced
Matrices
The native
ECM comprises a complicated and often anisotropic structure, with
a combination of fibers and network polymers, such as collagen fibers
aligned in tissue.[27] Thus, the use of fibrous
structures in designed materials has been employed to better mimic
native ECM and guide cell direction; electrospinning has been a widely
used and simple method to produce controlled nanoscale fibers.[204] The applied high-voltage electrostatic force
draws a polymer fiber from polymer solutions,[205] and the resulting fibers can collected into isotropic or
aligned fibrous mats. The activities of cardiomyocytes cultured on
random and aligned electrospun biodegradable polyurethane fiber mats
were different, with greater multicellular organization on the aligned
fiber mats.[206] Materials comprising poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/gelatin electrospun nanofibrous
have also been produced to mimic cardiac tissue;[207] after electrospinning, the hydrophilic gelatin could be
rehydrated to yield fiber-like hydrogels. Cardiomyocytes cultured
on the PLGA/gelatin nanofiber showed enhanced attachment and spreading.
Thermoresponsive multiblockpoly(PEG/PPG/PCLurethane) hydrogel nanofibers
have also been produced for temperature-mediated BSA release from
fibers,[208] and encapsulated proteins, such
as nerve growth factor (NGF)[209] and lysozyme,[210] maintained their bioactivity after release
from PCL-based electrospun fibers.Nanofibers are also commonly
employed fillers used to enhance the mechanical properties of hydrogels.
Fibers produced from several biocompatible and biodegradable polymers,
including PCL, poly-l-lactide (PLLA), and chitosan, have
been studied in different hydrogel systems. Chitosan nanofibers (CNF)
incorporated in a PAAm hydrogel improved the mechanical properties
of the CNF/PAAm hydrogel compared with those of chitosan/PAAm hydrogels,
showing a 2.5-fold higher compressive stress to 50.2 kPa (at 95% strain)
than the chitosan/PAAm hydrogels.[211] In
another example, biodegradable PCL was electrospun with gelatin to
form a PCL-gelatin core–shell fiber,[20] which was mixed with gelatin and cross-linked to form a composite
hydrogel. The fibrous composite hydrogel showed an improvement in
modulus to 20.3 kPa from 3.2 kPa (for a gelatin-only hydrogel). In
addition, the fibrous structure of the PCL-gelatin alone served to
direct cell orientation in a 2D aligned electrospun fiber mat,[206] similar to other studies described above. The
fibrous composite hydrogel provides a hydrated local environment and
3D support for cells, which is an advantage over traditional fiber
mat scaffolds. The construction of aligned fiber hydrogel constructs
for cell culture applications remains an active research area owing
to its potential in various therapies, including the cardiovascular
area.
Hybrid Materials with Engineered
Biological
Functions
Although the strategies described above have provided
alternatives
for achieving mechanically robust networks, a lack of cell–matrix
interaction often leads to the failure of the biomaterials in in vitro
and in vivo studies.[212−214] Various cell–matrix interactions,
including cell adhesion and matrix degradation are required for cell
growth and migration,[25] and hybrid hydrogels
can be employed to capture these properties (Figure 5) in a chemically and mechanically versatile substrate.
Figure 5
Important materials
design considerations for tissue engineering,
including cell adhesion peptide, protease sensitive peptide for cell-mediated
matrix degradation, and presence of signaling molecules.
Important materials
design considerations for tissue engineering,
including cell adhesion peptide, protease sensitive peptide for cell-mediated
matrix degradation, and presence of signaling molecules.
Cell Adhesion
An inherent limitation
of synthetic materials in biological applications is the lack of cell–matrix
interactions, which limits cell attachment, remodeling, and migration
in a scaffold. Incorporating ECM molecules and cell adhesive peptides
(such as those from fibronectin and laminin) in the matrix materials
has been widely shown to provide significant enhancement in cellular
interactions with various scaffolds.[26,27,118,214−216] The integrin-mediated cell adhesion facilitated by these macromolecules
provides for cell attachment, spreading, actin organization, and focal
adhesion.[214] The Arg-Gly-Asp tripeptide
(RGD) has been the most commonly employed cell adhesive peptide in
hybrid hydrogel systems because of its effective cell adhesion through
most integrins.[215] Besides the RGD peptide,
sequences derived from laminin (LN; such as IKVAV, YIGSR) and fibronectin
(FN; such as KQAGDV, REDV) also have been used to induce cell adhesion
on hydrogel matrices.[118] Table 1 lists additional cell adhesion peptides that have
been employed in hydrogel matrices; these sequences, and others, have
shown value for stabilizing cells in matrices, as well as facilitating
cell migration and maintaining cell functions.[217−221]
Table 1
Commonly Employed Cell Adhesion Peptides
Used in Hydrogels
peptides
origin
hydrogel
cells
refs
RGD
FN, LN, collagen
PEG, ELP, RLP
endothelial cells, hMSCs, AoAF,
islet
(72,134,160,162,222)
KQAGDV
FN
PEG
human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs)
(223,224)
REDV
FN
PEG
endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)
(220)
PHSRN
FN
PEG, HA
monocyte and valvular interstitial
cells (VICs)
(225)
IKVAV
LN
SAP, agarose
neural stem cells and PC12 cells
(226)
YIGSRG
LN
PEG
endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)
(220)
PDSGR
LN
PEG
murine pancreatic β-cells
(227)
LRE
LN
PEG
murine pancreatic β-cells
(227)
IKLLI
LN
PEG
murine pancreatic β-cells
(227)
GFOGER
collagen-I
PEG
hMSCs
(117)
VAPG
elastin
PEG
human aortic smooth
muscle cells
(223)
Degradation
Besides cell adhesion,
controllable degradation of the matrix material is also important
for cell growth and tissue regeneration. The designed scaffold has
to degrade at a rate comparable with cell growth and deposition of
ECM molecules. Perhaps the most commonly used degradation mechanism
for synthetic hydrogels is hydrolytic degradation of ester linkages
or polyester segments in polymers.[118] Despite
the widespread and simple application of these hydrolytic strategies,
however, hydrolytic degradation rates are difficult to control in
vivo and are not controlled by cell growth.[137,228,229] Therefore, cell-mediated degradation
strategies have been employed to optimize scaffold degradation with
ECM deposition.[25,54,218,219,230,231]Matrix metalloproteinase
(MMP)-sensitive peptides are a class of enzyme-sensitive peptides
derived from native ECM proteins, such as collagen or elastin, that
promote cell-mediated matrix degradation;[118] Table 2 shows a range of enzyme-sensitive
peptides used for these applications. The use of these sequences offers
substantive flexibility in controlling matrix degradation, as the
substitution of amino acids in a MMP-sensitive peptide modifies degradation
kinetics.[213] The degradation rates of the
materials can extend over a wide range of time scales by simple variations
of the amino acids in the sequences, which can provide sufficient
control for achieving degradation times that match the needs of a
given application. In one example, the morphology of hMSCs encapsulated
in MMP-sensitive peptide cross-linked PEG hydrogel depends on the
concentration of MMP-sensitive peptide in the hydrogel; variations
in the peptide concentration in the hydrogel also permitted the control
of hMSC differentiation in different culture media.[54]
Table 2
Commonly Employed Enzymatically Cleavable
Peptides Used in Hydrogels
peptides
hydrogel
enzyme
cells
refs
GPQG ↓ IAGQ
PEG
MMP-1, collagenase
human foreskin
fibroblasts
(213,230)
GPQG ↓ IWGQ
PEG, RLP, HA
MMP-1, collagenase
human foreskin fibroblasts, hMSCs
(54,160,213,230,232)
GPQG ↓ PAGQ
PEG
collagenase
(230)
L ↓ GPA
PEG
MMP-1
human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) and HASMCs
(224)
YK ↓ NRD
PEG
plasmin
(233)
VR ↓ N
PEG, HA
plasmin
MSC
(234)
CGGY ↓
C
PEG
chymotrypsin
(51)
AAPV
↓ RGGG
PEG
elastase
human neutrophil elastase
(115)
AAAAAAAAA
PEG
elastase
human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) and HASMCs
(224)
PEN
↓ FF
PEG
MMP-13
hMSCs
(235)
LVG
↓ LIG
alginate, pluronic
MMP-2
hMSCs
(236,237)
In addition to the use of MMP-sensitive
peptides for cell-mediated
matrix degradation, hydrogels with controlled degradation rates have
also been widely employed in drug delivery. The incorporation of a
humanneutrophil elastase (HNE)-sensitive peptide in a PEG hydrogel
via thiol–ene chemistry[115,238] was employed to trigger
the release of a model protein upon triggered degradation of the HNE-sensitive
sequence,[238] indicating the potential for
cell-mediated degradation in drug delivery applications.[239,240] Controllable matrix degradation is also important in 3D cell culture.
Relevant examples include the use of a substrate, carboxybetaine methacrylate
(CBMA), for reaction with a disulfide containing cross-linker via
radical polymerization to form a hydrogel in the presence of cells.
During cell culture, this hydrogel rapidly degrades owing to the reaction
of the disulfide-containing cross-linker with the cysteine-containing
media, permitting recovery of the encapsulated cells.[52] Recent exploitation in our laboratories of retro Michael-type
addition has also been employed to control hydrogel degradation. In
these cases, degradation of select thioether succinimide bonds has
been employed to degrade PEG/heparin hydrogels and release heparin
at glutathione (GSH) concentrations consistent with intracellular
concentrations.[241] The degradation mechanism
can also be employed for GSH-triggered release of model proteins from
PEG-only hydrogels, providing an opportunity for targeted protein
delivery over time scales unique from those of disulfide- or hydrolytic-mediated
mechanisms.[242] A recent review provides
a comprehensive description of hydrogel degradation in cellular microenvironments
via hydrolytic, enzymatic, thiol-exchange, and photolytic mechanisms.[228]
Immunological Modulation
Tissue Regeneration
The recognition
of materials by macrophages, which release chemokines to recruit immune
cells, and subsequent chronic immune responses often lead to rejection
of the implants or scaffolds.[35] Recent
studies suggest that an active modulated immune response can direct
tissue regeneration;[243] inflammatory cytokines
have an important role in initiation of acute inflammation, cell proliferation,
and modulation of tissue healing.[35,244] Interleukin-1
(IL-1), granulocytecolony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte
macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), CC-chemokine ligand
2 (CCL2), and CCL5 are several of the important factors for tissue
healing.[25] Hydrogels that deliver GM-CSF
topically have been shown to enhance wound healing in patients with
second degree burns.[245] In addition, chemokines
can induce chemotaxis that guides progenitor and stem cell migration
and tissue reconstruction. Stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1), in one
such example, was loaded in PEG-heparin hydrogels and showed significant
improvement in guiding the migration of early endothelial progenitor
cells (eEPCs) compared to gels that did not contain SDF-1;[246] the incorporated SDF-1 also reduced scar tissue
formation and promoted improved tissue healing.[247] Growth factors and tolerance-promoting antigens also have
also been shown to enhance tissue regeneration.[31,248] For example, regeneration of muscle in a mouse model could be promoted
via the use of an RGD-modified alginate hydrogel for codelivery of
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor-1
(IGF-1), and myoblasts;[249] the VEGF promoted
angiogenesis and IGF-1 promoted myogenesis. Hydrogels able to incorporate
and controllably release multiple biomolecules, including cells, cytokines,
and growth factors, may improve tissue regeneration by the minimization
of chronic immune responses and enhancement of tissue growth.
Cancer Therapy
In addition to tissue
healing and regeneration, modulated innate immune responses can also
be useful for vaccination, treatment of autoimmune disease, or cancer
therapies. Studies have shown that PLGA can induce overexpression
of TNF-α and IL-6 from dendritic cells (DCs) and enhance immune
response; furthermore, PLGA microparticles induced a greater response
than PLGA films.[250] The enhancement of
TNF-α production can also lead to cell death, with possible
applications for cancer treatment. An HA/PEG hydrogel was employed
to encapsulate a PEGylated tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing
ligand (TRAIL).[251] The HA/PEG hydrogel
showed sustained release of the PEGylated TRAIL in vitro and in vivo,
and the PEGylated TRAIL stimulated more apoptosis and greater antitumor
efficiency compared to a TRAIL-only hydrogel in an in vivo study on
Mia Paca-2 cell-xenografted BALB/c nu/nu mice.[251] The tumor volume and tumor weight was significantly less
than the blank control at 27 days of treatment, as shown in Figure 6.[251] In addition to the
release of single classes of molecules, the benefits of codelivery
have also been indicated for similar applications. In particular,
codelivery of cytokine interleukin-2 (IL-2) and oligodeoxynucleotide
immunostimulatory agents, from injectable alginate hydrogels, has
been investigated.[129] IL-2 recruits T-cells
to the local site for immunostimulation by the oligodeoxynucleotides,
which stimulate both innate and adaptive immune responses and inhibit
metastasis and tumor growth.[38]
Figure 6
(a) Mia
Paca-2 cell-xenografted BALB/c nu/nu mice treated with
blank, TRAIL, or PEG-TRAIL HA hydrogels for 27 days. (b) Removed tumors
from each treatment group (n = 4), (c) tumor volume,
and (d) tumor weight after 27 days.[251] Reproduced
with permission from ref (251). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
The
unmethylated, single-stranded cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) oligodeoxynucleotides
(ODN) are common activating agents of dendritic cells (DCs),[38] which has been the basis for their incorporation
into many types of polymeric materials and carriers for stimulation
of immune responses, including polymer conjugation[252] and matrix incorporation.[253] In a particular study, CpG-coated alginate microspheres were encapsulated
in an alginate matrix along with IL-2; the microspheres immobilized
and modulated the release of the CpG ODN, which enhanced the activation
of bone-marrow-derived DCs and further activated tumor-specific, cytotoxic
T-cells.[253] The hybrid gel was able to
modulate the sustained release of the CpG and show enhanced antitumor
efficiency compare to CpG-only injections in mice. Such novel hybrid
hydrogels offer great promise in modulating the release rates and
sequential delivery of antitumor factors. These approaches are additionally
powerful when deployed with injectable hydrogels, which allow direct
injection at tumor sites for sustained and targeted cancer treatment.(a) Mia
Paca-2 cell-xenografted BALB/c nu/nu mice treated with
blank, TRAIL, or PEG-TRAILHA hydrogels for 27 days. (b) Removed tumors
from each treatment group (n = 4), (c) tumor volume,
and (d) tumor weight after 27 days.[251] Reproduced
with permission from ref (251). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Gene Therapy
Gene therapy aims to
treat disease by promotion of essential gene expression by delivered
plasmid DNA (pDNA) or by gene silencing by small interfering RNA (siRNA)
to target cells.[254] Genetic materials such
as DNA and RNA, however, are rapidly degraded by DNases and RNases
and, thus, require protection; a wide variety of approaches therefore
have been developed for producing vectors for gene delivery.[255−258] Electrostatic complexation of DNA with polyethylenimine (PEI), prior
to release and internalization by the targeted cells, is likely the
most commonly employed strategy for complexing and delivering DNA.
In a recent example, a PEI–poly(organophosphazene) conjugate
was used to bind siRNA and form a thermoresponsive hydrogel owing
to the thermosensitive poly(organophosphazene) segment.[259] The hydrogel exhibits a gelation temperature
of approximately 37 °C and can thus be used in injectable gene
therapy, serving as a reservoir for sustained release of PEI–siRNA
polyplexes upon degradation of the ester linkage. An acrylated disulfide
containing siRNA macromer was employed in particle replication in
nonwetting templates (PRINT) technology for formation of nanogels.[260] Cleavage of the disulfide linkage in the presence
of reducing agents, which are prevalent inside the cell, promoted
cleavage and release of siRNA in the intracellular environment. The
hydrogel served as additional protection for gene delivery applications.The delivered vector often activates the innate immune response
that leads to activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) against
the vector and the therapeutic gene.[261] Vaccine therapies and gene therapies for cancer and immunodeficiency
benefit from the immune reaction that recruits DCs and APCs for immune
activation and target transfection, although this response must be
controlled in order to be useful. Injectable, composite hydrogels
for sequential delivery of chemokines, siRNA, and DNA have thus been
developed.[262] The siRNA and DNA were loaded
into PLGA nanoparticles and the chemokines were encapsulated in a
dextran/PEG hydrogel matrix. The chemokine attracted dendritic cells
(Figure 7) and promoted an immune response,
while the siRNA and DNA induced gene silencing of IL-10 and immune
modulation of the DCs by upregulation of phenotypic surface markers.
Figure 7
(a) Schematic multicomponent
hydrogels for immunotherapies. The
chemokine signals the migration of the dendritic cells to the hydrogel
and siRNA-DNA loaded nanoparticles lead to gene silencing and immune
modulation. (b) Primary antigen-presenting cells (APCs) migrating
in response to chemokine released from control hydrogels (top), bolus
dose (middle), and chemokine loaded hydrogels (bottom) at 0, 4, and
18 h.[262] Reproduced with permission from
ref (262). Copyright
2009 Elsevier.
Besides allowing the sequestration and release of molecules to
attract target cells, peptide-coated nanoparticles or nanogels have
also been used for targeted gene delivery and enhancement of cell
transfection via receptor-peptide binding.[263] PNIPAAm nanogels coated with the YSAYPDSVPMMS (YSA) peptide bound
erythro poietin-producing hepatocellular (Eph) A2 receptors, which
resulted in localization of the nanogels in cells with high EphA2
expression, a common marker in tumor cells. This specific peptide-receptor
binding has the potential to be used more broadly for targeting specific
cells and promoting higher gene transfection.(a) Schematic multicomponent
hydrogels for immunotherapies. The
chemokine signals the migration of the dendritic cells to the hydrogel
and siRNA-DNA loaded nanoparticles lead to gene silencing and immune
modulation. (b) Primary antigen-presenting cells (APCs) migrating
in response to chemokine released from control hydrogels (top), bolus
dose (middle), and chemokine loaded hydrogels (bottom) at 0, 4, and
18 h.[262] Reproduced with permission from
ref (262). Copyright
2009 Elsevier.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Multifunctional hydrogels
exhibit improved mechanical and biological
properties that can be modulated via chemical and physical methods.
The existence of well-developed chemistries for bioconjugation and
cross-linking, including an expanding range of click reactions, has
enabled the controlled incorporation of a variety of multifunctional
groups and the design of specialized cross-linked networks containing
composite structures and both synthetic and biological materials.
Strategies for increasing cross-linking density (to improve modulus),
while at the same time maintaining elasticity, have been of enormous
interest and promise. The mechanical properties can be enhanced by
judicious design of the matrix polymers (and copolymers) and/or the
components in the gel; the combination of synthetic and natural polymers
offers interesting opportunities to obtain biomechanically active
hydrogels. Materials based on elastin and resilin can provide mechanically
active function that mimics the biomechanical properties of the native
tissue. However, comprehensive studies on the cellular response and
in vivo studies of these synthetic and natural hybrid hydrogels remain
limited.The development of composite hydrogels has provided
a versatile
alternative approach for improving the strength of hydrogels via the
use of a stiff second network that reinforces the weak hydrogel network,
or via the incorporation of particles in the hydrogel matrix. Hybrid
two-phase hydrogels also provide an addition platform for stimuli-induced
drug delivery, with the drug stably encapsulated in the second phase
until a stimulus is applied. The applications of composite hydrogels
as tissue engineering scaffolds has been useful for incorporating
drugs into matrices, and modulating the codelivery drugs or molecules
at different release rates, while enhancing the mechanical strength.
Additional studies that investigate the ratio of the two phases, and
the resulting impact on mechanical properties and release kinetics
of cargo from the hybrid hydrogel, are needed to inform the design
of materials that can control the release of multiple drugs. In addition,
while most composite hybrid hydrogels are produced in two steps (particle
fabrication and subsequent encapsulation into hydrogel matrix), strategies
that would simplify composite gel production into a single step would
find significant value, as it would eliminate the need for additional
purification of particles prior to their incorporation into hydrogels
for biomedical uses. Extensive biological studies are needed to evaluate
those materials for such use.The ability to encapsulate viable
cells in 3D formats is a step
toward effective cell delivery and tissue regeneration. The incorporation
of bioactive peptides has been widely employed to control cell attachment,
proliferation and differentiation within synthetic hydrogels, and
cell-mediated degradation of these matrices has improved cell growth
and spreading. Appropriate design of multicomponent hydrogels has
enabled interesting and many untapped opportunities for programming
cell behavior to stimulate simultaneous immunotherapeutic treatment
and tissue regeneration. While most of the immunomodulating hydrogels
studied have been weak physical hydrogels, such as alginate, there
is demonstrated and continued need to employ chemically cross-linked
and mechanically robust hydrogels for understanding the impact of
the matrix on immune response. While it is well-known that the mechanical
properties of a matrix modulate cell behavior, the impact of the mechanical
properties of a matrix on DCs and their resulting cytokine profile
has not yet been studied in detail; further understanding of these
processes will inform tissue regeneration, cancer, or gene therapies.Taken together, the body of work described herein clearly illustrates
that the potential of multicomponent hybrid hydrogels for a variety
of applications in tissue regeneration and drug delivery. By incorporating
and modulating the mechanical functional and bioactive components
in the network, the mechanical and biological properties of the hydrogel
can be tuned independently without sacrificing one or the other. In
the future, hybrid hydrogels are expected to further mimic the microenvironment
for cells and tissue reorganization. The mechanically active components
should be aimed not only at affecting the bulk mechanical properties,
but also should capture the micromechanical properties in native tissue.
Multicomponent hydrogels with well-organized domains will offer significant
opportunities for these materials.
Authors: Linqing Li; Jeanna M Stiadle; Hang K Lau; Aidan B Zerdoum; Xinqiao Jia; Susan L Thibeault; Kristi L Kiick Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Oluwaseyi T Shofolawe-Bakare; Larry D Stokes; Mehjabeen Hossain; Adam E Smith; Thomas A Werfel Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 6.843
Authors: Raluca Ianchis; Claudia M Ninciuleanu; Ioana C Gifu; Elvira Alexandrescu; Raluca Somoghi; Augusta R Gabor; Silviu Preda; Cristina L Nistor; Sabina Nitu; Cristian Petcu; Madalina Icriverzi; Paula E Florian; Anca M Roseanu Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 5.076
Authors: Marcelo A da Silva; Samuel Lenton; Matthew Hughes; David J Brockwell; Lorna Dougan Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 6.988