Literature DB >> 25421406

The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.

Valérie Camos1, Sophie Portrat.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that long-term retention of items studied in a working memory span task depends on the refreshing of memory items-more specifically, on the number of refreshing opportunities. However, it was previously shown that refreshing depends on the cognitive load of the concurrent task introduced in the working memory span task. Thus, cognitive load should determine the long-term retention of items assessed in a delayed-recall test if such retention relies on refreshing. In two experiments, while the amount of refreshing opportunities remained constant, we varied the cognitive load of the concurrent task by either introducing tasks differing in their attentional demands or varying the pace of the concurrent task. To verify that this effect was related to refreshing and not to any maintenance mechanism, we also manipulated the availability of subvocal rehearsal. Replicating previous results, increasing cognitive load reduced immediate recall. This increase also had a detrimental effect on delayed recall. Conversely, the addition of concurrent articulation reduced immediate but not delayed recall. This study shows that both working and episodic memory traces depend on the cognitive load of the concurrent task, whereas the use of rehearsal affects only working memory performance. These findings add further evidence of the dissociation between subvocal rehearsal and attentional refreshing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25421406     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  A processing approach to the working memory/long-term memory distinction: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

3.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: testing four models of the complex span paradigm.

Authors:  Annekatrin Hudjetz; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

5.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Gerome Mora; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

7.  The influence of aging on attentional refreshing and articulatory rehearsal during working memory on later episodic memory performance.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013

8.  Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Gérôme Mora; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Joel Myerson; Henry L Roediger; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests.

Authors:  David P McCabe
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  10 in total

1.  Promoting the experimental dialogue between working memory and chunking: Behavioral data and simulation.

Authors:  Sophie Portrat; Alessandro Guida; Thierry Phénix; Benoît Lemaire
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Aurore Pageot; Gaën Plancher; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Lea M Bartsch; Henrik Singmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

4.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

5.  Epidemic investigations within an arm's reach - role of google maps during an epidemic outbreak.

Authors:  Roman Sonkin; Evan Avraham Alpert; Eli Jaffe
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2020-07-12

6.  Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Kyle O Hardman; Jeffrey N Rouder; Emily Roemer; Sara McAllaster; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Attention in working memory: attention is needed but it yearns to be free.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Using More Ecological Paradigms to Investigate Working Memory: Strengths, Limitations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Lison Fanuel; Gaën Plancher; Pascale Piolino
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses.

Authors:  Moritz Wächtler; Josef Kessler; Martin Walger; Hartmut Meister
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

10.  Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson et al. (2013).

Authors:  Naomi Langerock; Giuliana Sposito; Caro Hautekiet; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.