Literature DB >> 25414929

Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust.

Emma Engdahl, Rolf Lidskog.   

Abstract

Current discussions on public trust, as well as on risk communication, have a restricted rationalistic bias in which the cognitive-reflexive aspect of trust is emphasized at the expense of its emotional aspect. This article contributes to a substantive theory of trust by exploring its emotional character. Drawing on recent discussions in science and technology studies, social psychology, and general social theory, it argues that trust is a modality of action that is relational, emotional, asymmetrical, and anticipatory. Hence, trust does not develop through information and the uptake of knowledge but through emotional involvement and sense-making. The implications of this conception of trust for public understandings of science and for risk communication are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25414929     DOI: 10.1177/0963662512460953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  10 in total

1.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  "Why won't they just vaccinate?" Horse owner risk perception and uptake of the Hendra virus vaccine.

Authors:  J Manyweathers; H Field; N Longnecker; K Agho; C Smith; M Taylor
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Current State and Problems of Radiation Risk Communication: Based on the Results of a 2012 Whole Village Survey.

Authors:  Yujiro Kuroda
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Adolescents as agents of healthful change through scientific literacy development: A school-university partnership program in New Zealand.

Authors:  Jacquie L Bay; Mark H Vickers; Helen A Mora; Deborah M Sloboda; Susan M Morton
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2017-09-06

5.  A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comparison between COVID-19 infection control guidelines' applicability and their protective value as perceived by Israeli healthcare workers, and healthcare executives' response.

Authors:  Anat Gesser-Edelsburg; Ricky Cohen; Nour Abed Elhadi Shahbari; Rana Hijazi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  [Risk perception and information behaviour of opinion leaders in the food sector].

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Lindemann; Katrin Jungnickel; Gaby-Fleur Böl
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Integrity, Trustworthiness, and Effectiveness: Towards an Ethos for Forensic Genetics.

Authors:  Matthias Wienroth; Aaron Opoku Amankwaa; Carole McCartney
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.141

8.  Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes.

Authors:  Katie Todd; Gretchen Haupt; Elizabeth Kunz Kollmann; Sarah Pfeifle
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2018-03-30

9.  Understanding coronavirus disease (COVID-19) risk perceptions among the public to enhance risk communication efforts: a practical approach for outbreaks, Finland, February 2020.

Authors:  Anna-Leena Lohiniva; Jussi Sane; Katja Sibenberg; Taneli Puumalainen; Mika Salminen
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-04

10.  Optimising the Efficacy of Equine Welfare Communications: Do Equine Stakeholders Differ in Their Information-Seeking Behaviour and Communication Preferences?

Authors:  Persephone Pickering; Jo Hockenhull
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.