Literature DB >> 33968254

Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Laura Maxim, Mario Mazzocchi, Stephan Van den Broucke, Fabiana Zollo, Tobin Robinson, Claire Rogers, Domagoj Vrbos, Giorgia Zamariola, Anthony Smith.   

Abstract

This report assesses peer-reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a 'General Plan for Risk Communication', i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms 'hazard' and 'risk', tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade-offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report.
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audience analysis; disinformation; misinformation; risk communication; risk perceptions; risk profiling; trust

Year:  2021        PMID: 33968254      PMCID: PMC8083185          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  110 in total

1.  Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust.

Authors:  L Sjöberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  L J Frewer; A R H Fischer; M Brennan; D Bánáti; R Lion; R M Meertens; G Rowe; M Siegrist; W Verbeke; C M J L Vereijken
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.176

3.  The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science: What we know and what scientists can do about it.

Authors:  Antoine Marie; Sacha Altay; Brent Strickland
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Anticipating or Accommodating to Public Concern? Risk Amplification and the Politics of Precaution Reexamined.

Authors:  Jamie K Wardman; Ragnar Löfstedt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Reviews on common objectives and evaluation indicators for risk communication activities from 2011 to 2017.

Authors:  Akiko Sato; Kaori Honda; Kyoko Ono; Reiko Kanda; Takehiko I Hayashi; Yoshihito Takeda; Yoshitake Takebayashi; Tomoyuki Kobayashi; Michio Murakami
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Safety Behaviors to Reduce Risk of Using Chemical Household Products: An Application of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework.

Authors:  Minjung Lee; Myoungsoon You
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah K Colley; Peter K M Kane; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Marta E Alonso; José R González-Montaña; Juan M Lomillos
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Fortune favours the prepared mind: a national perspective on pandemic preparedness.

Authors:  Theresa Tam; Jill Sciberras; Beatrice Mullington; Arlene King
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

10.  Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.

Authors:  Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Simon More; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Peter Craig; Andrew Hart; Natalie Von Goetz; Kostas Koutsoumanis; Alicja Mortensen; Bernadette Ossendorp; Laura Martino; Caroline Merten; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Anthony Hardy
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2018-01-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Chinese Consumers' Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods.

Authors:  Xiaocheng Wang; Yanbo Xu; Miaomiao Liang; Jian Gao; Jing Wang; Si Chen; Jingmin Cheng
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 2.  [Risk communication of policy advising scientific organisations: a thematic outline using the example of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment].

Authors:  Fabian Brand; Leonie Dendler; Suzan Fiack; Annett Schulze; Gaby-Fleur Böl
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.595

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.