Literature DB >> 33289851

[Risk perception and information behaviour of opinion leaders in the food sector].

Ann-Kathrin Lindemann1, Katrin Jungnickel2, Gaby-Fleur Böl2.   

Abstract

Opinion leaders are people who can influence the opinions, attitudes or behaviours of others in their social environment. Especially in social networks on the Internet, they can also reach larger audiences and therefore represent a crucial target group for risk communication. An important prerequisite for successful risk communication is a precise knowledge of the risk perception of the relevant target group, so that this can be taken into account when developing communication measures. The present study therefore investigated the extent to which there is a connection between the risk perception of food issues and issue-specific opinion leadership. For this purpose, a representative telephone survey of the population in Germany was conducted (n = 1001). According to this, opinion leaders have a slightly higher risk perception of food risks for some topics than non-opinion leaders. They are also much more interested in these topics and access information on food issues more frequently via specific media. Opinion leaders also tend to be more active in social media. In the buzz of social media, they can thus offer valuable orientation for their social and digital environment through their special knowledge and opinions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food safety; Information behaviour; Opinion leadership; Risk communication; Risk perception

Year:  2020        PMID: 33289851     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  9 in total

1.  Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting.

Authors:  V T Covello; R G Peters; J G Wojtecki; R C Hyde
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust.

Authors:  Emma Engdahl; Rolf Lidskog
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-08

3.  Rethinking Social Amplification of Risk: Social Media and Zika in Three Languages.

Authors:  Christopher D Wirz; Michael A Xenos; Dominique Brossard; Dietram Scheufele; Jennifer H Chung; Luisa Massarani
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Risk Preference: A View from Psychology.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Renato Frey; David Richter; Jürgen Schupp; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2018

5.  Identifying the characteristics of nurse opinion leaders to aid the integration of genetics in nursing practice.

Authors:  Verity Andrews; Emma Tonkin; Deborah Lancastle; Maggie Kirk
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Perception of risk.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Beyond Words: Amplification of Cancer Risk Communication on Social Media.

Authors:  Yulia A Strekalova; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-09-28

8.  Determinants and beliefs of health information mavens among a lower-socioeconomic position and minority population.

Authors:  Emily Z Kontos; Karen M Emmons; Elaine Puleo; K Viswanath
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits.

Authors:  Renato Frey; Andreas Pedroni; Rui Mata; Jörg Rieskamp; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.