Literature DB >> 25414912

Comparison of Kinetic Models for Dual-Tracer Receptor Concentration Imaging in Tumors.

Nazanin Hamzei1, Kimberley S Samkoe2, Jonathan T Elliott3, Robert W Holt4, Jason R Gunn, Tayyaba Hasan, Brian W Pogue, Kenneth M Tichauer.   

Abstract

Molecular differences between cancerous and healthy tissue have become key targets for novel therapeutics specific to tumor receptors. However, cancer cell receptor expression can vary within and amongst different tumors, making strategies that can quantify receptor concentration in vivo critical for the progression of targeted therapies. Recently a dual-tracer imaging approach capable of providing quantitative measures of receptor concentration in vivo was developed. It relies on the simultaneous injection and imaging of receptor-targeted tracer and an untargeted tracer (to account for non-specific uptake of the targeted tracer). Early implementations of this approach have been structured on existing "reference tissue" imaging methods that have not been optimized for or validated in dual-tracer imaging. Using simulations and mouse tumor model experimental data, the salient findings in this study were that all widely used reference tissue kinetic models can be used for dual-tracer imaging, with the linearized simplified reference tissue model offering a good balance of accuracy and computational efficiency. Moreover, an alternate version of the full two-compartment reference tissue model can be employed accurately by assuming that the K1s of the targeted and untargeted tracers are similar to avoid assuming an instantaneous equilibrium between bound and free states (made by all other models).

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25414912      PMCID: PMC4235770     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Austin J Biomed Eng


  33 in total

1.  Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Masanori Ichise; Hiroshi Toyama; Robert B Innis; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Trial watch: phase III and submission failures: 2007-2010.

Authors:  John Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Improved tumor contrast achieved by single time point dual-reporter fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian J Sexton; Jason R Gunn; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Production of transforming growth factor alpha in human pancreatic cancer cells: evidence for a superagonist autocrine cycle.

Authors:  J J Smith; R Derynck; M Korc
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  High vascular delivery of EGF, but low receptor binding rate is observed in AsPC-1 tumors as compared to normal pancreas.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian Sexton; Kenneth M Tichauer; Shannon K Hextrum; Omar Pardesi; Scott C Davis; Julia A O'Hara; P Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Microscopic Delineation of Medulloblastoma Margins in a Transgenic Mouse Model Using a Topically Applied VEGFR-1 Probe.

Authors:  Danni Wang; Ye Chen; Steven Y Leigh; Henry Haeberle; Christopher H Contag; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 9.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Charles Sawyers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pixel-based absorption correction for dual-tracer fluorescence imaging of receptor binding potential.

Authors:  Stephen C Kanick; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Correcting for targeted and control agent signal differences in paired-agent molecular imaging of cancer cell-surface receptors.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  In vivo quantifying molecular specificity of Cy5.5-labeled cyclic 9-mer peptide probe with dynamic fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yunpeng Dai; Jipeng Yin; Yu Huang; Xueli Chen; Guodong Wang; Yajun Liu; Xianghan Zhang; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Investigation of the influence of sampling schemes on quantitative dynamic fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yunpeng Dai; Xueli Chen; Jipeng Yin; Guodong Wang; Bo Wang; Yonghua Zhan; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Residualization Rates of Near-Infrared Dyes for the Rational Design of Molecular Imaging Agents.

Authors:  Cornelius Cilliers; Jianshan Liao; Lydia Atangcho; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Paired-agent imaging for detection of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Yeonjae Park; Kayla Marra; Eunice Y Chen; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-26

8.  Generalized paired-agent kinetic model for in vivo quantification of cancer cell-surface receptors under receptor saturation conditions.

Authors:  N Sadeghipour; S C Davis; K M Tichauer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Quantification of the binding potential of cell-surface receptors in fresh excised specimens via dual-probe modeling of SERS nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lagnojita Sinha; Yu Wang; Cynthia Yang; Altaz Khan; Jovan G Brankov; Jonathan T C Liu; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Microscopic lymph node tumor burden quantified by macroscopic dual-tracer molecular imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jason R Gunn; Stephen C Kanick; P Jack Hoopes; Richard J Barth; Peter A Kaufman; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.