Literature DB >> 29675325

Investigation of the influence of sampling schemes on quantitative dynamic fluorescence imaging.

Yunpeng Dai1,2, Xueli Chen1,3,2, Jipeng Yin4,2, Guodong Wang4, Bo Wang1, Yonghua Zhan1,5, Yongzhan Nie4, Kaichun Wu4, Jimin Liang1,6.   

Abstract

Dynamic optical data from a series of sampling intervals can be used for quantitative analysis to obtain meaningful kinetic parameters of probe in vivo. The sampling schemes may affect the quantification results of dynamic fluorescence imaging. Here, we investigate the influence of different sampling schemes on the quantification of binding potential (BP) with theoretically simulated and experimentally measured data. Three groups of sampling schemes are investigated including the sampling starting point, sampling sparsity, and sampling uniformity. In the investigation of the influence of the sampling starting point, we further summarize two cases by considering the missing timing sequence between the probe injection and sampling starting time. Results show that the mean value of BP exhibits an obvious growth trend with an increase in the delay of the sampling starting point, and has a strong correlation with the sampling sparsity. The growth trend is much more obvious if throwing the missing timing sequence. The standard deviation of BP is inversely related to the sampling sparsity, and independent of the sampling uniformity and the delay of sampling starting time. Moreover, the mean value of BP obtained by uniform sampling is significantly higher than that by using the non-uniform sampling. Our results collectively suggest that a suitable sampling scheme can help compartmental modeling of dynamic fluorescence imaging provide more accurate results and simpler operations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (170.2655) Functional monitoring and imaging; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine

Year:  2018        PMID: 29675325      PMCID: PMC5905930          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.001859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  26 in total

1.  A Cy5.5-labeled phage-displayed peptide probe for near-infrared fluorescence imaging of tumor vasculature in living mice.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Li-Peng Yap; Ryan Park; Xiaoli Hui; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan; Xiaoyuan Chen; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.520

2.  Molecular imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Dynamic imaging of transient metabolic processes by small-animal PET for the evaluation of photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Véronique Bérard; Jacques A Rousseau; Jules Cadorette; Laurent Hubert; M'hamed Bentourkia; Johan E van Lier; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Evaluation of Tc-99 m Labeled Dimeric GX1 Peptides for Imaging of Colorectal Cancer Vasculature.

Authors:  Jipeng Yin; Xiaoli Hui; Liping Yao; Ming Li; Hao Hu; Jing Zhang; Bo Xin; Minglei He; Jing Wang; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging.

Authors:  Mark Muzi; Finbarr O'Sullivan; David A Mankoff; Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Brenda F Kurland; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  The role of molecular imaging in modern drug development.

Authors:  Lídia Cunha; Krisztián Szigeti; Domokos Mathé; Luís F Metello
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 7.851

8.  Quantitative measurement of lymphatic function in mice by noninvasive near-infrared imaging of a peripheral vein.

Authors:  Steven T Proulx; Qiaoli Ma; Diana Andina; Jean-Christophe Leroux; Michael Detmar
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-01-12

9.  High vascular delivery of EGF, but low receptor binding rate is observed in AsPC-1 tumors as compared to normal pancreas.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian Sexton; Kenneth M Tichauer; Shannon K Hextrum; Omar Pardesi; Scott C Davis; Julia A O'Hara; P Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  In vivo gastric cancer targeting and imaging using novel symmetric cyanine dye-conjugated GX1 peptide probes.

Authors:  Jing Xin; Xianghan Zhang; Jimin Liang; Limin Xia; Jipeng Yin; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jie Tian
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.774

View more
  1 in total

1.  Kinetic modeling and analysis of dynamic bioluminescence imaging of substrates administered by intraperitoneal injection.

Authors:  Yunpeng Dai; Duofang Chen; Guodong Wang; Jipeng Yin; Yonghua Zhan; Kaichun Wu; Jimin Liang; Xueli Chen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.