Literature DB >> 25412403

Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Laura Attanasio1, Katy B Kozhimannil, Judy Jou, Marianne E McPherson, William Camann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most women who give birth in United States hospitals receive neuraxial analgesia to manage pain during labor. In this analysis, we examined themes of the patient experience of neuraxial analgesia among a national sample of U.S. mothers.
METHODS: Data are from the Listening to Mothers II survey, conducted among a national sample of women who delivered a singleton baby in a U.S. hospital in 2005 (N = 1,573). Our study population consisted of women who experienced labor, did not deliver by planned cesarean, and who reported neuraxial analgesia use (n = 914). We analyzed open-ended responses about the best and worst parts of women's birth experiences for themes related to neuraxial analgesia using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of women (n = 300) mentioned neuraxial analgesia in their open-ended responses. We found that effective pain relief was frequently spontaneously mentioned as a key positive theme in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia. However, some women perceived timing-related challenges with neuraxial analgesia, including waiting in pain for neuraxial analgesia, receiving neuraxial analgesia too late in labor, or feeling that the pain relief from neuraxial analgesia wore off too soon, as negative aspects. Other themes in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia were information and consent, adverse effects of neuraxial analgesia, and plans and expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this analysis underscored the fact that women appreciate the effective pain relief that neuraxial analgesia provides during childbirth. Although pain control was 1 important facet of women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia, their experiences were also influenced by other factors. Anesthesiologists can work with obstetric clinicians, nurses, childbirth educators, and pregnant and laboring patients to help mitigate some of the challenges with timing, communication, neuraxial analgesia administration, or expectations that may have contributed to negative aspects of women's birth experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25412403      PMCID: PMC4437967          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   6.627


  41 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Gonen Ohel; Roni Gonen; Sonia Vaida; Shlomi Barak; Luis Gaitini
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  TeamSTEPPS and patient safety in healthcare.

Authors:  Faye Sheppard; Marcie Williams; Victor R Klein
Journal:  J Healthc Risk Manag       Date:  2013

4.  Building collaborative teams in neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  Dara Brodsky; Munish Gupta; Mary Quinn; Jane Smallcomb; Wenyang Mao; Nina Koyama; Virginia May; Karen Waldo; Susan Young; DeWayne M Pursley
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Racial differences in the use of epidural analgesia for labor.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Richard Wissler; Christopher Glantz; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Patient-centered performance management: enhancing value for patients and health care systems.

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour.

Authors:  G Capogna; D Celleno; G Lyons; M Columb; P Fusco
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Miriam H Labbok; Carol Sakala; MaryAnn O'Hara
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Use of nonmedical methods of labor induction and pain management among U.S. women.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela J Johnson; Laura B Attanasio; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Patricia M McGovern
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 10.  Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Millicent Anim-Somuah; Rebecca Md Smyth; Leanne Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.

Authors:  Eva K Lee; Haozheng Tian; Jinha Lee; Xin Wie; John Neeld; K Doug Smith; Alan R Kaplan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 2.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Initiation of labor analgesia with injection of local anesthetic through the epidural needle compared to the catheter.

Authors:  Goran Ristev; Angela C Sipes; Bryan Mahoney; Jonathan Lipps; Gary Chan; John C Coffman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gill Thomson; Claire Feeley; Victoria Hall Moran; Soo Downe; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Outcomes of intrathecal analgesia in multiparous women undergoing normal vaginal delivery: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gaballah M Khaled; Abdallah I Sabry
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-04

6.  Paradox lost on the U.S.-Mexico border: U.S. Latinas and cesarean rates.

Authors:  Theresa Morris; Amanda Gomez; Miriam Naiman-Sessions; Christine H Morton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.