Literature DB >> 16522386

Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial.

Gonen Ohel1, Roni Gonen, Sonia Vaida, Shlomi Barak, Luis Gaitini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early initiation of epidural analgesia in nulliparous women affects the rate of cesarean sections and other obstetric outcome measures. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized trial in which 449 at term nulliparous women in early labor, at less than 3 cm of cervical dilatation, were assigned to either immediate initiation of epidural analgesia at first request (221 women), or delay of epidural until the cervix dilated to at least 4 cm (228 women).
RESULTS: At initiation of the epidural the mean cervical dilatation was 2.4 cm in the early epidural group and 4.6 cm in the late group (P < 0.0001). The rates of cesarean section were not significantly different between the groups--13% and 11% in the early and late groups, respectively (P = 0.77). The mean duration from randomization to full dilatation was significantly shorter in the early compared to the late epidural group--5.9 hours and 6.6 hours respectively (P = 0.04). When questioned after delivery regarding their next labor, the women indicated a preference for early epidural.
CONCLUSION: Initiation of epidural analgesia in early labor, following the first request for epidural, did not result in increased cesarean deliveries, instrumental vaginal deliveries, and other adverse effects; furthermore, it was associated with shorter duration of the first stage of labor and was clearly preferred by the women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16522386     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  19 in total

1.  [Obstetric epidural analgesia : quantity and quality].

Authors:  U Stamer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  A prospective review of the labor analgesia programme in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Indranil Sikdar; Shivinder Singh; Rangraj Setlur; C V R Mohan; Rashmi Datta; S R Patrikar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-06-21

Review 4.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Pudendal nerve block in HDR-brachytherapy patients: do we really need general or regional anesthesia?

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Catarina Schenck; Herbert Rübben; Martin Stuschke; Tim Schneider; Andreas Eisenhardt; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Pain management during labor.

Authors:  Ruth Landau
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-01-21

Review 7.  Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future.

Authors:  E N Grant; W Tao; M Craig; D McIntire; K Leveno
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Nicolás Benítez-Parejo; Jorge Del Diego-Salas; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Claudio Maañón-Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Advances in labor analgesia.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wong
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

10.  Massage therapy and labor outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patricia Janssen; Farah Shroff; Paula Jaspar
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2012-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.