Literature DB >> 30815114

Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.

Eva K Lee1,2,3, Haozheng Tian1,2,3, Jinha Lee1,2,3, Xin Wie1,2,3, John Neeld4, K Doug Smith4, Alan R Kaplan4.   

Abstract

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of a large-dose, needle-based epidural technique in obstetric anesthesia. The technique differs from a standard, catheter-based approach in that the anesthetic dose is administered through an epidural needle prior to insertion of the epidural catheter. Using a data-driven informatics and machine learning approach, our findings show that the needle-based technique is faster and more dose-effective in achieving sensory level. We also find that injecting large doses in the epidural space through the epidural needle is safe, with complication rates similar to those reported in published literature for catheter-based technique. Further, machine learning reveals that if the needle dose is kept under 18 ml, the resulting hypotension rate will be significantly lower than published results. The machine learning framework can predict the incidence of hypotension with 85% accuracy. The findings from this investigation facilitate delivery improvement and establish an improved clinical practice guideline for training and for dissemination of safe practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815114      PMCID: PMC6371386     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  37 in total

1.  Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10,995 cases.

Authors:  M J Paech; R Godkin; S Webster
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.603

2.  A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor.

Authors:  G C Meister; R D'Angelo; M Owen; K E Nelson; R Gaver
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Epidural failure rate using a standardised definition.

Authors:  A Thangamuthu; I F Russell; M Purva
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.603

4.  The second thousand epidural blocks in an obstetric hospital practice.

Authors:  J S Crawford
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees.

Authors:  M C Vallejo; A L Phelps; S Singh; S L Orebaugh; N Sah
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 2.603

6.  Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient.

Authors:  T W Breen; T Shapiro; B Glass; D Foster-Payne; N E Oriol
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques.

Authors:  M C Norris; W M Grieco; M Borkowski; B L Leighton; V A Arkoosh; H J Huffnagle; S Huffnagle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Lower incidence of post-dural puncture headache with spinal catheterization after accidental dural puncture in obstetric patients.

Authors:  S Verstraete; M A Walters; S Devroe; E Roofthooft; M Van de Velde
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  Accidental dural puncture and post dural puncture headache in obstetric anaesthesia: presentation and management: a 23-year survey in a district general hospital.

Authors:  J S Sprigge; S J Harper
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Marianne E McPherson; William Camann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.