Literature DB >> 26542991

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2015. Part 1 of 2: Plaque imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Wael A AlJaroudi1, Fadi G Hage2,3.   

Abstract

In 2015, many original articles pertaining to cardiovascular imaging with impressive quality were published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. In a set of 2 articles, we provide an overview of these contributions to facilitate for the interested reader a quick review of the advancements that occurred in the field over this year. In this first article, we focus on arterial plaque imaging, cardiac positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Keywords:  Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque; computed tomography (CT); fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG); magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial perfusion imaging: PET

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26542991     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-015-0319-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  41 in total

1.  Associations between HIV infection and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Wendy S Post; Matthew Budoff; Lawrence Kingsley; Frank J Palella; Mallory D Witt; Xiuhong Li; Richard T George; Todd T Brown; Lisa P Jacobson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The good, bad, and ugly of incidental findings on cardiovascular-computed tomography.

Authors:  Pradeep Bhambhvani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Quantitative molecular imaging of cardiac amyloidosis: The journey has begun.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Marie Foley Kijewski; Mi-Ae Park
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A novel PET tracer for targeted imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Comparison of Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and exercise F18-FDG imaging in detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sasikumar Arun; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Anish Bhattacharya; Manoj Kumar Rohit
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review.

Authors:  B M Pampana Gowd; Gary V Heller; Matthew W Parker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  (18)F-FDG PET and vascular inflammation: time to refine the paradigm?

Authors:  Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Increased regional epicardial fat volume associated with reversible myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tuba Khawaja; Christine Greer; Samir R Thadani; Tomoko S Kato; Ketan Bhatia; Daichi Shimbo; Andrew Kontak; Andrew Konkak; Sabahat Bokhari; Andrew J Einstein; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Comparison of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with stress nuclear perfusion for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ijaz G Ahmad; Raushan K Abdulla; Igor Klem; Roman Margulis; Alexander Ivanov; Ambreen Mohamed; Robert M Judd; Salvatore Borges-Neto; Raymond J Kim; John F Heitner
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.952
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2016. Part 1 of 2: Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.952
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.