Literature DB >> 21109114

Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score.

Andrew J Einstein1, Lynne L Johnson, Sabahat Bokhari, Jessica Son, Randall C Thompson, Timothy M Bateman, Sean W Hayes, Daniel S Berman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium (CAC) from computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans performed for hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
BACKGROUND: At the time of MPI, hybrid systems obtain a low-dose, non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated CT scan that is used to perform attenuation correction. Utility of this CTAC scan in estimating actual CAC as measured by Agatston score (AS) on standard ECG-gated scans has not been previously studied.
METHODS: A total of 492 patients, from 3 centers, receiving both MPI with CTAC and a standard CAC scan were studied. At each site, experienced readers blinded to AS reviewed CTAC images, visually estimating CAC on a 6-level scale: classifying patients as estimated AS of 0, 1 to 9, 10 to 99, 100 to 300, 400 to 999, or ≥1,000. Agreement between visually estimated coronary artery calcium (VECAC) on CTAC and AS, measured standardly and converted to the same scale, was evaluated, as was inter-reader agreement.
RESULTS: Although CTAC images are low dose and nongated, a high degree of association was observed between VECAC and AS, with 63% of VECACs in the same category as the AS category and 93% within 1 category. Weighted kappa was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 0.91, p < 0.0001). High weighted kappa statistics were observed for each site, scanner type, and sex. Readers reported identical scores in 65% of cases and scores within 1 category in 93%.
CONCLUSIONS: CAC can be visually assessed from low-dose CTAC scans with high agreement with AS. CTAC scans should be routinely assessed for VECAC.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109114      PMCID: PMC3040452          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  SPECT attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology's manifest destiny.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT with three different CT protocols: a comparison with conventional PET.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Frank Bengel; Raymonde Busch; Coletta Kruschke; Helga Fernolendt; Denise Lee; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Evaluation of a low-dose/slow-rotating SPECT-CT system.

Authors:  M Hamann; M Aldridge; J Dickson; R Endozo; K Lozhkin; B F Hutton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Clinically significant incidental findings on the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT studies: frequency in 250 patients.

Authors:  Medhat M Osman; Christian Cohade; Elliot K Fishman; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Clinical utility of coronary calcium scoring after nonischemic myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; A Iain McGhie; Kevin W Moser; James H O'Keefe; Tracy L Stevens; John House; Nicolas Fritsch; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Optimal CT breathing protocol for combined thoracic PET/CT.

Authors:  Matthew D Gilman; Alan J Fischman; Vikram Krishnasetty; Elkan F Halpern; Suzanne L Aquino
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Hideya Yamamoto; Nobuhiko Hirai; Farzana Alam; Hideaki Kakizawa; Masashi Hieda; Toshihiro Tachikake; Kazushi Marukawa; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening: concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT.

Authors:  Ming-Ting Wu; Pinchen Yang; Yi-Luan Huang; Jian-Shyong Chen; Chiung-Chen Chuo; Chinson Yeh; Ruey-Sheng Chang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Stefan Ulzheimer; Sandra S Halliburton; Kaiss Shanneik; Richard D White; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsuura; Jun Horiguchi; Hideya Yamamoto; Nobuhiko Hirai; Tetsuji Tonda; Nobuoki Kohno; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  71 in total

1.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Detection of coronary calcium during standard chest computed tomography correlates with multi-detector computed tomography coronary artery calcium score.

Authors:  Jacobo Kirsch; Ivan Buitrago; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; Tianming Gao; Craig R Asher; Gian M Novaro
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Visual identification of coronary calcifications on attenuation correction CT improves diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas D Patchett; Sumeet Pawar; Edward J Miller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Decreased serum TRAIL is associated with increased mortality in smokers with comorbid emphysema and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Oluremi Ajala; Yingze Zhang; Aman Gupta; Jessica Bon; Frank Sciurba; Divay Chandra
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.415

5.  The influence of coronary calcium score on the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Mohamed Mouden; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Jorik R Timmer; Stoffer Reiffers; Ad H J Oostdijk; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  What to do with an equivocal myocardial perfusion study?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium scoring with a two-slice SPECT/CT system: can the attenuation map be calculated from the calcium scoring CT scan?

Authors:  Christian Wenning; Kambiz Rahbar; Alexis Vrachimis; Otmar Schober; Michael Schäfers; Lars Stegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Coronary artery calcification in clinical practice: what we have learned and why should it routinely be reported on chest CT?

Authors:  Joseph Shemesh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 9.  Cardiac PET-CT for monitoring medical and interventional therapy in patients with CAD: PET alone versus hybrid PET-CT?

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Arterial inflammation in bronchial asthma.

Authors:  Jayanthi Vijayakumar; Sharath Subramanian; Parmanand Singh; Erin Corsini; Sara Fontanez; Meredith Lawler; Rebecca Kaplan; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Ahmed Tawakol
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.