Literature DB >> 25403846

Application of modeling and simulation to a long-term clinical trial: a direct comparison of simulated data and data actually observed in Japanese osteoporosis patients following 3-year ibandronate treatment.

Kiyohiko Nakai1, Satofumi Iida, Masato Tobinai, Junko Hashimoto, Takehiko Kawanishi.   

Abstract

Ibandronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is a bone resorption inhibitor widely used to prevent and treat osteoporosis. To optimize the design for a long-term clinical study of ibandronate, modeling and simulation (M&S) was performed based on the result of population pharmacodynamic analysis using the data of a short-term clinical study. A population pharmacodynamic model was constructed by the urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (uCTx) and the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) data obtained in clinical studies, including a phase II study of Japanese osteoporosis patients treated with ibandronate for 6 months. Changes in BMD over a period of 3 years were simulated from the population pharmacodynamic parameters of the patients in this phase II study. The relationship between uCTx and BMD was well described by this modeling. The functions of disease progression and supplemental treatment were incorporated into the model to simulate a long-term clinical study with high accuracy. A long-term clinical study with a 3-year treatment was conducted after this M&S. The percentage change from baseline in observed BMD values were found to be similar to the prospectively simulated values. This study showed that M&S could be a useful and powerful tool for designing and conducting long-term clinical studies when carried out in the following sequence: (1) conduct a short-term clinical study; (2) perform M&S; and (3) conduct the long-term clinical study. Application of this procedure to various other treatment agents will establish the usefulness of M&S for long-term clinical studies and bring further efficiencies to drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25403846     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-014-0206-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  19 in total

1.  Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling.

Authors:  Vincent Lemaire; Frank L Tobin; Larry D Greller; Carolyn R Cho; Larry J Suva
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Application of a mechanism-based disease systems model for osteoporosis to clinical data.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Stephan Schmidt; Lambertus A Peletier; Rik de Greef; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of ibandronate in Caucasian and Japanese healthy males and postmenopausal females.

Authors:  G Pillai; R Gieschke; T Goggin; J Barrett; E Worth; J L Steimer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.366

4.  Three monthly intravenous injections of ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  D Thiébaud; P Burckhardt; H Kriegbaum; H Huss; H Mulder; J R Juttmann; K H Schöter
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Goonaseelan Pillai; Ronald Gieschke; Timothy Goggin; Philippe Jacqmin; Ralph C Schimmer; Jean-Louis Steimer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Bisphosphonate use and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft.

Authors:  Jörg Schilcher; Karl Michaëlsson; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Clinical utility of a pharmacostatistical model for ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  J-Y Reginster; R Gieschke
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Arne Skag; Claus Christiansen; Robert Recker; Jacob A Stakkestad; Arne Hoiseth; Dieter Felsenberg; Hermann Huss; Jennifer Gilbride; Ralph C Schimmer; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study.

Authors:  John A Eisman; Roberto Civitelli; Silvano Adami; Edward Czerwinski; Chris Recknor; Richard Prince; Jean-Yves Reginster; Mone Zaidi; Dieter Felsenberg; Claire Hughes; Nicole Mairon; Daiva Masanauskaite; David M Reid; Pierre D Delmas; Robert R Recker
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Toshitaka Nakamura; Tetsuo Nakano; Masako Ito; Hiroshi Hagino; Junko Hashimoto; Masato Tobinai; Hideki Mizunuma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modeling and simulation of bone mineral density in Japanese osteoporosis patients treated with zoledronic acid using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, a bone resorption marker.

Authors:  Y Mori; H Kasai; A Ose; M Serada; M Ishiguro; M Shiraki; Y Tanigawara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Automated Scale Reduction of Nonlinear QSP Models With an Illustrative Application to a Bone Biology System.

Authors:  Chihiro Hasegawa; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.