Literature DB >> 15563360

A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Goonaseelan Pillai1, Ronald Gieschke, Timothy Goggin, Philippe Jacqmin, Ralph C Schimmer, Jean-Louis Steimer.   

Abstract

AIMS: Ibandronate, a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is the subject of an ongoing clinical development programme that aims to maximize the potential of simplified, less frequent oral and intravenous (i.v.) administration in osteoporosis. A modelling and simulation project was undertaken to characterize further the clinical pharmacology of ibandronate and identify convenient intermittent oral and i.v. regimens for clinical evaluation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using selected data from clinical studies involving 174 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), a classical multicompartmental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed that accurately described the PK of i.v. ibandronate in plasma and urine and urinary excretion of the C-telopeptide of the alpha chain of type I collagen (uCTX), a sensitive biomarker of PD response to ibandronate. To reduce processing times, the classical PK-PD model was simplified using a "kinetics of drug action" or kinetic (K)-PD model (i.e. a dose-response model as opposed to a dose-concentration-response model). The performance of the K-PD model was evaluated by fitting data simulated with the PK-PD model under various dosing regimens. The simplified model produced a virtually indistinguishable fit of the data from that of the PK-PD model. The K-PD model was extended to consider the influence of supplemental therapy (calcium with or without vitamin D) on the PD response and validated by retrospectively simulating the uCTX response in a prior Phase III and Phase II/III study of i.v. ibandronate, given once every 3 months, in 3380 women with PMO. The observed median uCTX responses at the scheduled assessment points in the completed studies were within the distribution of the simulated responses. The K-PD model for i.v. ibandronate was extended further to allow simultaneous fitting of uCTX responses after i.v. and oral administration in 676 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and validated by retrospectively simulating the data observed in a Phase I study of oral daily ibandronate in 180 women with PMO. The K-PD model adequately described the uCTX response after oral dosing.
CONCLUSIONS: This validated K-PD model is currently being used to evaluate a range of novel intermittent oral and i.v. ibandronate regimens in an ongoing clinical development programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15563360      PMCID: PMC1884644          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02224.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  30 in total

Review 1.  Markers of bone turnover for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis with antiresorptive drugs.

Authors:  P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Clinical trial simulation of docetaxel in patients with cancer as a tool for dosage optimization.

Authors:  C Veyrat-Follet; R Bruno; R Olivares; G R Rhodes; P Chaikin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development.

Authors:  R Gieschke; J L Steimer
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 4.  Modeling of dose-response-time data: four examples of estimating the turnover parameters and generating kinetic functions from response profiles.

Authors:  J Gabrielsson; W J Jusko; L Alari
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.627

5.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Prevention and Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Efficacy and safety of oral weekly ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Cyrus Cooper; Ronald D Emkey; Robert H McDonald; Gillian Hawker; Gerolamo Bianchi; Katie Wilson; Ralph C Schimmer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women.

Authors:  M C Chapuy; M E Arlot; F Duboeuf; J Brun; B Crouzet; S Arnaud; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; D R Stanski; S Vozeh; R D Miller; J Ham
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  39 in total

1.  On the pharmacological evaluation of bisphosphonates in humans.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Frank Hal Ebetino; Roger Phipps
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Integrated model for denosumab and ibandronate pharmacodynamics in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Dhananjay D Marathe; Anshu Marathe; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 3.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model.

Authors:  P Jacqmin; E Snoeck; E A van Schaick; R Gieschke; P Pillai; J-L Steimer; P Girard
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Disease progression and pharmacodynamics in Parkinson disease - evidence for functional protection with levodopa and other treatments.

Authors:  Nicholas H G Holford; Phylinda L S Chan; John G Nutt; Karl Kieburtz; Ira Shoulson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Semi-mechanistic model for neutropenia after high dose of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Amelia Ramon-Lopez; Ricardo Nalda-Molina; Belen Valenzuela; Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Ibandronate: A Review in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Structural models describing placebo treatment effects in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Venkatesh Pilla Reddy; Magdalena Kozielska; Martin Johnson; An Vermeulen; Rik de Greef; Jing Liu; Geny M M Groothuis; Meindert Danhof; Johannes H Proost
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  A semi-mechanistic model of bone mineral density and bone turnover based on a circular model of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Erno van Schaick; Jenny Zheng; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo; Ronald Gieschke; Philippe Jacqmin
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.