Literature DB >> 15234198

Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling.

Vincent Lemaire1, Frank L Tobin, Larry D Greller, Carolyn R Cho, Larry J Suva.   

Abstract

We propose a mathematical model explaining the interactions between osteoblasts and osteoclasts, two cell types specialized in the maintenance of the bone integrity. Bone is a dynamic, living tissue whose structure and shape continuously evolves during life. It has the ability to change architecture by removal of old bone and replacement with newly formed bone in a localized process called remodeling. The model described here is based on the idea that the relative proportions of immature and mature osteoblasts control the degree of osteoclastic activity. In addition, osteoclasts control osteoblasts differentially depending on their stage of differentiation. Despite the tremendous complexity of the bone regulatory system and its fragmentary understanding, we obtain surprisingly good correlations between the model simulations and the experimental observations extracted from the literature. The model results corroborate all behaviors of the bone remodeling system that we have simulated, including the tight coupling between osteoblasts and osteoclasts, the catabolic effect induced by continuous administration of PTH, the catabolic action of RANKL, as well as its reversal by soluble antagonist OPG. The model is also able to simulate metabolic bone diseases such as estrogen deficiency, vitamin D deficiency, senescence and glucocorticoid excess. Conversely, possible routes for therapeutic interventions are tested and evaluated. Our model confirms that anti-resorptive therapies are unable to partially restore bone loss, whereas bone formation therapies yield better results. The model enables us to determine and evaluate potential therapies based on their efficacy. In particular, the model predicts that combinations of anti-resorptive and anabolic therapies provide significant benefits compared with monotherapy, especially for certain type of skeletal disease. Finally, the model clearly indicates that increasing the size of the pool of preosteoblasts is an essential ingredient for the therapeutic manipulation of bone formation. This model was conceived as the first step in a bone turnover modeling platform. These initial modeling results are extremely encouraging and lead us to proceed with additional explorations into bone turnover and skeletal remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234198     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  85 in total

1.  Integrated model for denosumab and ibandronate pharmacodynamics in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Dhananjay D Marathe; Anshu Marathe; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Mutation in Osteoactivin Promotes Receptor Activator of NFκB Ligand (RANKL)-mediated Osteoclast Differentiation and Survival but Inhibits Osteoclast Function.

Authors:  Samir M Abdelmagid; Gregory R Sondag; Fouad M Moussa; Joyce Y Belcher; Bing Yu; Hilary Stinnett; Kimberly Novak; Thomas Mbimba; Matthew Khol; Kurt D Hankenson; Christopher Malcuit; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Low-energy irradiation stimulates formation of osteoclast-like cells via RANK expression in vitro.

Authors:  Norihito Aihara; Masaru Yamaguchi; Kazutaka Kasai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  A semi-mechanistic model of bone mineral density and bone turnover based on a circular model of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Erno van Schaick; Jenny Zheng; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo; Ronald Gieschke; Philippe Jacqmin
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Translational Quantitative Systems Pharmacology in Drug Development: from Current Landscape to Good Practices.

Authors:  Jane P F Bai; Justin C Earp; Venkateswaran C Pillai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  A coupled mechano-biochemical model for bone adaptation.

Authors:  Václav Klika; Maria Angelés Pérez; José Manuel García-Aznar; František Maršík; Manuel Doblaré
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  The synergistic regulatory effect of Runx2 and MEF transcription factors on osteoblast differentiation markers.

Authors:  Jae-Mok Lee; Towia A Libermann; Je-Yoel Cho
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  A mathematical model of bone remodeling dynamics for normal bone cell populations and myeloma bone disease.

Authors:  Bruce P Ayati; Claire M Edwards; Glenn F Webb; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Evaluation of the role of FGF23 in mineral metabolism.

Authors:  Hiroki Yokota; João F Raposo; Andy Chen; Chang Jiang; Hugo G Ferreira
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2009-08-03

10.  Application of Petri nets in bone remodeling.

Authors:  Lingxi Li; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2009-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.