Literature DB >> 17190376

Population pharmacokinetics of ibandronate in Caucasian and Japanese healthy males and postmenopausal females.

G Pillai1, R Gieschke, T Goggin, J Barrett, E Worth, J L Steimer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ibandronate is a potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that is licensed as a once-monthly oral preparation and is currently in clinical development as a novel intermittent intravenous (i.v.) injection in osteoporosis. Ibandronate pharmacokinetic (PK) data were used to develop a PK model that could ultimately be incorporated into a PK pharmacodynamic (PD) model to assist the ibandronate development program through computer-assisted trial design. This manuscript reports the use of non-linear mixed-effects modeling to characterize the PK of ibandronate, to examine the possible influence of ethnicity on the disposition of ibandronate and to develop an appropriate population PK model for ibandronate.
METHODS: A retrospective, cross-study population PK analysis was performed using PK data from five phase I studies with i.v. ibandronate (0.125 - 2.0 mg) conducted in Caucasian and Japanese healthy male volunteers, postmenopausal Caucasian women without osteopenia and postmenopausal Japanese women with osteopenia. The following covariates were investigated to establish their influence on the central volume of distribution (V1) and drug clearance (CL): age, body weight, gender, disease status (healthy versus osteopenic), creatinine clearance (CLCR), and ethnicity (Japanese versus Caucasian). Serum concentrations of ibandronate were quantified by GC-MS or ELISA, and data were modeled using non-linear mixed-effects modeling implemented by the software program NONMEM.
RESULTS: The PK of ibandronate was adequately described by a linear 3-compartment model. Disease status, body weight, gender and CLCR significantly influenced ibandronate CL (10 34%) and the latter 3 also influenced V1 (20 29%). Ethnicity was not a determinant for ibandronate PK in the final model. Although gender was the most influential covariate, differences in V1 and CL between the sexes were modest (29 and 34%, respectively) and the overall effects on ibandronate exposure (Cmax and AUC) were not clinically relevant. The final model described the observed PK of ibandronate well, and all PK parameters were estimated with an acceptable degree of precision (SE < 13%).
CONCLUSION: The PK of i.v. ibandronate was well described by a linear 3-compartment population PK model that included disease status, body weight, gender and CLCR as covariates, but without greatly affecting ibandronate exposure (Cmax and AUC). Ethnicity did not influence ibandronate PK and was not included in the final model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17190376     DOI: 10.5414/cpp44655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ibandronate: A Review in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the penetration of antituberculosis agents in rabbit pulmonary lesions.

Authors:  Maria C Kjellsson; Laura E Via; Anne Goh; Danielle Weiner; Kang Min Low; Steven Kern; Goonaseelan Pillai; Clifton E Barry; Véronique Dartois
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A network modeling approach for the spatial distribution and structure of bone mineral content.

Authors:  Hui Li; Aidong Zhang; Lawrence Bone; Cathy Buyea; Murali Ramanathan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Application of modeling and simulation to a long-term clinical trial: a direct comparison of simulated data and data actually observed in Japanese osteoporosis patients following 3-year ibandronate treatment.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Nakai; Satofumi Iida; Masato Tobinai; Junko Hashimoto; Takehiko Kawanishi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Racial difference in bioavailability of oral ibandronate between Caucasian and Taiwanese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  W-Y Chiu; C-J Lin; W-S Yang; K-S Tsai; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Bone-targeted therapies for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma: current and future directions.

Authors:  Thomas Roza; Lukman Hakim; Hendrik van Poppel; Steven Joniau
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Nakai; Masato Tobinai; Junko Hashimoto; Satofumi Iida; Takehiko Kawanishi
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.441

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.