Literature DB >> 12042269

A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer.

Ingrid Van der Auwera1, Sophie Debrock, Carl Spiessens, Hilde Afschrift, Els Bakelants, Christel Meuleman, Luc Meeuwis, Thomas M D'Hooghe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled study was performed in an unselected IVF/ICSI population to test the hypothesis that blastocyst transfers result in higher clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per oocyte retrieval when compared with day 2 transfers.
METHODS: Blind randomization for transfer on day 2 (group 1) or day 5/6 (group 2) was performed before stimulation. Oocytes and embryos were cultured in sequential media in 5.5% CO(2), 5% O(2), 89.5% N(2) and 90% humidity. A maximum of two embryos was transferred.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar for age, IVF indication, number of treatment cycles, rate of ICSI/IVF, number of fertilized oocytes and number of embryos transferred. The CPR/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 1 (32%) and in group 2 (44%), while the CPR/embryo transfer was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in group 2 (60%) than in group 1 (35%). Similarly, the implantation rate per embryo transferred was significantly higher (P < 0.03) in group 2 (46%) than in group 1 (29%). The cryo-augmented delivery rate/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 2 (36.3%) and in group 1 (28.6%).
CONCLUSION: This randomized study in an unselected population showed a significantly higher CPR/embryo transfer and a tendency toward a higher CPR/oocyte retrieval in patients receiving blastocysts when compared with day 2 transfers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12042269     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  19 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of day 5 morphology grading and metabolomic Viability Score on predicting implantation outcome.

Authors:  Emre Seli; Can Bruce; Lucy Botros; Mark Henson; Pieter Roos; Kevin Judge; Thorir Hardarson; Aishling Ahlström; Paul Harrison; Michael Henman; Kathryn Go; Nicole Acevedo; Jeannette Siques; Michael Tucker; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells.

Authors:  Masoud Zamani Esteki; Eftychia Dimitriadou; Ligia Mateiu; Cindy Melotte; Niels Van der Aa; Parveen Kumar; Rakhi Das; Koen Theunis; Jiqiu Cheng; Eric Legius; Yves Moreau; Sophie Debrock; Thomas D'Hooghe; Pieter Verdyck; Martine De Rycke; Karen Sermon; Joris R Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.

Authors:  S Fernández-Shaw; R Cercas; C Braña; C Villas; I Pons
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers.

Authors:  Ye Yin; Ge Chen; Kezhen Li; Qiuyue Liao; Sijia Zhang; Nieying Ma; Jing Chen; Yan Zhang; Jihui Ai
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36.

Authors:  Fabrice Guerif; Malak Lemseffer; Milène Blanchard; Dominique Royere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Selective single blastocyst transfer study: 604 cases in 6 years.

Authors:  Nirmala Sadasivam; Narayanan M Sadasivam
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-01

8.  Building a model to increase live birth rate through patient-specific optimization of embryo transfer day.

Authors:  R H Goldman; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; L V Farland; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and embryo quality: Clues for single blastocyst transfer from double blastocyst transfer in an unselected population.

Authors:  Tetsuaki Hara; Takafumi Katsuki; Tomoyo Kusuda; Koso Ohama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-03

10.  Elective single embryo transfer: Comparison of blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kawamura; Michiko Mori; Akane Arichi; Yuko Tajima; Yasuhiro Karasawa; Kahori Suga; Sachiko Ikumi; Seika Ishikawa; Makiko Kawamura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.