The first examples of catalyst-controlled stereoselective macrocyclic ring-closing metathesis reactions that generate Z-enoates as well as (E,Z)- or (Z,E)-dienoates are disclosed. Reactions promoted by 3.0-10 mol % of a Mo-based monoaryloxide pyrrolide complex proceed to completion within 2-6 h at room temperature. The desired macrocycles are formed in 79:21 to >98:2 Z/E selectivity; stereoisomerically pure products can be obtained in 43-75% yield after chromatography. Utility is demonstrated by application to a concise formal synthesis of the natural product (+)-aspicilin.
The first examples of catalyst-controlled stereoselective macrocyclic ring-closing metathesis reactions that generate Z-enoates as well as (E,Z)- or (Z,E)-dienoates are disclosed. Reactions promoted by 3.0-10 mol % of a Mo-based monoaryloxide pyrrolide complex proceed to completion within 2-6 h at room temperature. The desired macrocycles are formed in 79:21 to >98:2 Z/E selectivity; stereoisomerically pure products can be obtained in 43-75% yield after chromatography. Utility is demonstrated by application to a concise formal synthesis of the natural product (+)-aspicilin.
Macrocyclic
structures containing
a carbonyl unit conjugated to one or more alkenes are present in many
biologically active molecules.[1] Other than
ester bond-forming reactions, Horner–Emmons-type transformations
and catalytic ring-closing metathesis (RCM) are two distinct approaches
that allow access to large-ring E-enoates. Reactions
between an aldehyde and a stabilized phosphonium ylide represent a
reliable way of synthesizing macrocycles; RCM, however, obviates the
need for protecting group manipulations and/or oxidation state adjustments
that often accompany the involvement of a carbonyl group. Macrocyclic Z-enoates can be obtained by reactions performed under modified
Horner–Emmons conditions,[2] through
the use of Still–Gennari-type phosphonate esters[3] or by partial hydrogenation of ynoates.[4] Catalyst-controlled Z-selective
RCM has the potential to give macrocyclic Z-enoates
efficiently, facilitating synthesis of molecules such as callyspongiolide[5] (Scheme 1a).[6] Further, RCM offers an attractive option for
preparing macrocyclic (E,Z)-[7] or (Z,E)-dienoates;
macrolactin A[8] is an example of a natural
product that contains such a moiety (Scheme 1b). Alternatively, the dienoate unit may be site-selectively and
diastereoselectively functionalized;[9] the case corresponding to preparation of aspicilin[10] is representative (Scheme 1b). Despite
the above considerations, macrocyclic RCM processes that deliver large
ring enoates and/or dienoates containing a Z-alkene
are yet to be disclosed. Here we report catalytic RCM reactions that
generate such entities efficiently and stereoselectively.
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of Macrocyclic Enoates by Z-Selective
RCM
We first examined the ability
of Ru, Mo, and W complexes, commonly
used and/or shown to be effective in Z-selective
macrocyclic RCM,[6] to promote the formation
of 14-membered-ring Z-enoate 2 (Table 1). Reaction with dichloro-Ru complex 3 was efficient (87% conv, 12 h), generating the lower energy E isomer selectively (5:95 Z/E, entry 1). Under conditions similar to those reported for RCM of
unactivated dienes,[6c] there was no detectable
transformation after 12 h in the presence of 10 mol% bidentate Ru
complex 4 (entry 2). With bis-alkoxide 5 (entry 3), only 42% conv was observed, presumably due to competitive
catalyst deactivation/decomposition; E-2 was again formed preferentially (16:84 Z/E).
Table 1
Screening of Ru,
Mo, and W Complexesa
Reactions
were performed under N2 atmosphere.
Conversion (total consumption of 1) and Z:E ratios (±2%)
were determined by analysis of 1H NMR spectra of unpurified
mixtures.
Product mixture
contained ca. 50%
of the dimeric macrocycle. See the Supporting
Information (SI) for details. Mes = 2,4,6-(Me)3C6H2; na = not applicable; nd = not determined.
Reactions
were performed under N2 atmosphere.Conversion (total consumption of 1) and Z:E ratios (±2%)
were determined by analysis of 1H NMR spectra of unpurified
mixtures.Product mixture
contained ca. 50%
of the dimeric macrocycle. See the Supporting
Information (SI) for details. Mes = 2,4,6-(Me)3C6H2; na = not applicable; nd = not determined.We then turned to examining
monoaryloxide pyrrolide (MAP) complexes
under conditions that allow for relatively facile reaction (100 Torr,
C6H6, 22 °C).[6a,6b] Use of W or Mo alkylidenes 6 and 7a led
to minimal reaction[11] (entries 4 and 5,
Table 1). Based on computational investigations
indicating that a more electron withdrawing imido group can impart
electronic stabilization of the metallacyclobutane intermediates
to increase efficiency,[6d] we probed the
activity of 2-(trifluoromethyl)phenylimido complex 7b (entry 6). After 2 h, 24% of 2 was formed with 72:28 Z/E selectivity. To enhance selectivity,
we opted for a more sizable aryloxide ligand according to our original
stereochemical model.[12] However, use of
MAP complex 8 led to complete loss of activity.At this point, we chose to prepare and examine MAPalkylidenes 9a,b, complexes that have not been previously
utilized. This was based on the hypothesis that electronic activation
imposed by the comparatively diminutive pentafluorophenylimido
ligand might improve catalyst performance[6d] while giving rise to elevated Z selectivity by
residing opposite to the sterically demanding aryloxides in the metallacyclobutane
intermediates. In the event, when 9a was used, 60% conv
to 2 was observed along with 89:11 Z/E selectivity (entry 8). When
the aryloxide substituents were altered from 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl
in 9a to a 2,4,6-tri(isopropyl)phenyl
moiety, catalyst activity disappeared entirely (entry 9). Optimization
studies indicated that 3.0–5.0 mol% of the in situ-generated
MAP complex 9a is sufficient to bring about considerable
conversion under 100 Torr of pressure, at ambient temperature and
after 2 h (Scheme 2). Longer reaction times
did not lead to further transformation.
Scheme 2
Z-Selective Macrocyclic Enoate RCM
Reactions
leading to 2, 10a,b, and 11a performed
at 1.0 mM. Conv = formation of desired macrocycle. See the SI for details.
Z-Selective Macrocyclic Enoate RCM
Reactions
leading to 2, 10a,b, and 11a performed
at 1.0 mM. Conv = formation of desired macrocycle. See the SI for details.Different
macrocyclic Z-enoates, from 14- to 19-membered
rings (2, 10–14, Scheme 2), can be synthesized in 79:21–90:10 Z/E selectivity. As the formation of 24-membered-ring 15a indicates, the catalytic protocol may be extended to larger
macrocyclic compounds. After silica gel chromatography, pure Z product isomers were isolated in 43–70% yield.
Ring closures are often more efficient for ring sizes larger than
15. Consistent with this trend, our efforts to obtain a 12-membered Z-enoate proved unsuccessful (<2% desired product). Depending
on the ring size and/or the nature of the substituents, RCM of an
acyclic diene precursor that contains additional functionality might
result in improved or diminished efficiency.[13] Thus, reactions leading
to 16- and 17-membered-ring products 11b and 12b proceeded to higher conversion and afforded the Z-enoates in better yield compared to 11a and 12a.Attempts to promote reactions that produce different α,β-unsaturated
amides led to negligible transformation (Scheme 3). The disparity between the reactions of ester and amide substrates
might arise from the ability of the latter to form Mo alkylidenes
that can be unreactive because of stronger chelation of the amide
carbonyl with the transition metal and/or A(1,3)-strain when R = Bn
or Boc.[14] Moreover, unlike Bocamide substituents
or unprotected indole units, the presence of a primary carbamate,
such as that in the expected product 15b, leads to substantial
activity loss; this might arise from association of the Lewis basic
unit with the Mo center and/or the acidity of the said substituent.
Scheme 3
Macrocyclic dienoates of diverse ring sizes can
be prepared through
the use of 5.0–10 mol% of 9a (Scheme 4). In cases involving E-dienoate
as substrates (e.g., 16, Scheme 4a), unlike transformations that afford Z-enoates, cyclizations proceed with complete control of
stereoselectivity (>98:2 Z/E) for up to 18-membered rings. In contrast, 20 is formed
in 91:9 Z:E selectivity. RCM with
Ru complexes represented by 3 and 4 proved
inefficient (e.g., <10% conv to 18 with 10 mol% complex
after 12 h). With the more active Mo bis-alkoxide 5,
20 mol% loading was required to achieve 50% and 34% conv to 18 and 19, respectively (<10% conv with 10
mol%). In the latter cases, whereas 18 was generated
with complete Z selectivity (similar to when 9a was used), there was minimal preference in the case of 19 (65% Z). Catalytic RCM leading to isomeric
(Z,E)-dienoates was performed with E-diene substrates (e.g., 21, Scheme 4b).[15] Stereoselectivity
was lower in these latter systems (cf. 22, 23 vs products in Scheme 4a), but isomerically
pure macrocyclic dienoates were obtained after chromatography. Use
of Ru dichloride 3 or Mo bis-alkoxide 5 did
not yield any desired product. Such disparities underscore the unique
ability of Mo MAP complexes to deliver the appropriate balance of
longevity and reactivity.
Scheme 4
Z-Selective Formation of
Macrocyclic Dienoates by
RCM
Conv = formation of the desired
macrocycle. See the SI for details.
Z-Selective Formation of
Macrocyclic Dienoates by
RCM
Conv = formation of the desired
macrocycle. See the SI for details.The transformations in Scheme 5 were carried
out to demonstrate utility of the approach. Conversion of 24(16) to 25 (80% yield) was
followed by RCM with 10 mol% 9a afforded stereoisomerically
pure (E,Z)-dienoate 26 in 69% yield. Oxidative removal of the p-methoxybenzyl
group generated 27 (91% yield), which has been converted
to aspicilin.[17]
Scheme 5
Application to Formal
Synthesis of (+)-Aspicilin
Conditions: (a) pentadienoic
acid, pivaloyl chloride, DMAP, Et3N. (b) 10 mol% 9a, C6H6, 22 °C, 100 Torr, 6 h.
(c) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O, 0 °C, 1
h. Conv = formation of desired macrocycle. See the SI for details.
Application to Formal
Synthesis of (+)-Aspicilin
Conditions: (a) pentadienoic
acid, pivaloyl chloride, DMAP, Et3N. (b) 10 mol% 9a, C6H6, 22 °C, 100 Torr, 6 h.
(c) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O, 0 °C, 1
h. Conv = formation of desired macrocycle. See the SI for details.For cyclic (E,Z)-dienoates (Scheme 4a) that are ≤18-membered, RCM processes are
completely Z-selective regardless of the type of
Mo alkylidene used (5 or 9a); for 19-membered
ring 20, better Z selectivity is obtained
with 9a, suggesting considerable catalyst control. This
is unlike cyclizations that lead to enoates (Scheme 2) or (Z,E)-dienoates (Scheme 4b). To gain insight regarding the above trends,
we calculated (DFT) the thermodynamic stereochemical preferences for
unfunctionalized cyclic alkenes (Figure 1,
A),[6b−6d] cyclic enoates (B; cf. Scheme 2); cyclic dienoates with an (E)-α,β-unsaturated
carbonyl and a (Z)-γ,δ-alkene (C; cf.
Scheme 4a), and those that bear a (Z)-α,β-unsaturated enoate and an (E)-γ,δ-alkene (D; cf. Scheme 4b).
With a sufficiently large ring, the thermodynamic preference approaches
that of acyclic systems. However, while the energy difference [ΔG(E) – ΔG(Z)] for type A and C rings does not exceed ∼1
kcal/mol (A′ and C′, Figure 1), the E isomer can be significantly more stable
in type B and D olefins (ΔΔG ≈
2 kcal/mol; cf. B′ and D′). For enoates and dienoates,
the thermodynamic preference for the E isomer is
reached at larger ring sizes compared to the less functionalized variants
(A) for which the turning point is at about the 11-membered ring system
(13–18-membered rings in B–D). With the less extensive
conjugation in a macrocyclic α,β-unsaturated ester, the E alkenes containing more than 13 atoms become favored (B).
On the contrary, preference for (E,E)-dienoates is
reached when 18–19-membered rings are being generated (C and
D, Figure 1). The ΔΔG value in the case of (Z,E)-dienoates
(D′) is larger (by ∼1 kcal/mol) for ring sizes above
∼18 atoms [vs (E,Z)-dienoates
in C′], consistent with the weaker drive for formation of E alkenes in RCM that furnish (E,Z)-dienoates (C) vs Z,E isomers (D).
Figure 1
Variations in the thermodynamic preferences of different
unsaturated
macrocyclic alkenes. See the SI for details
of calculations.
Variations in the thermodynamic preferences of different
unsaturated
macrocyclic alkenes. See the SI for details
of calculations.These studies expand
the applicability of Z-selective
olefin metathesis to include a set of transformations that is likely
to find substantial
utility in chemical synthesis. Development of related cross-metathesis
reactions[18] and studies on the impact of
the resulting Z-enoates and dienoates on the design
of multistep routes for preparation of complex biologically active
molecules[6e,18e] are in progrees.
Authors: Tim den Hartog; Syuzanna R Harutyunyan; Daniel Font; Adriaan J Minnaard; Ben L Feringa Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2008 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alexander W H Speed; Tyler J Mann; Robert V O'Brien; Richard R Schrock; Amir H Hoveyda Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Elsie C Yu; Brett M Johnson; Erik M Townsend; Richard R Schrock; Amir H Hoveyda Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Konstantin V Bukhryakov; Sudarsan VenkatRamani; Charlene Tsay; Amir Hoveyda; Richard R Schrock Journal: Organometallics Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Katharina Herz; Maren Podewitz; Laura Stöhr; Dongren Wang; Wolfgang Frey; Klaus R Liedl; Suman Sen; Michael R Buchmeiser Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 15.419