A convergent diastereo- and enantioselective total synthesis of anticancer and antifungal macrocyclic natural product disorazole C1 is reported. The central feature of the successful route is the application of catalytic Z-selective cross-metathesis (CM). Specifically, we illustrate that catalyst-controlled stereoselective CM can be performed to afford structurally complex Z-alkenyl-B(pin) as well as Z-alkenyl iodide compounds reliably, efficiently, and with high selectivity (pin = pinacolato). The resulting intermediates are then joined in a single-step operation through catalytic inter- and intramolecular cross-coupling to furnish the desired 30-membered ring macrocycle containing the critical (Z,Z,E)-triene moieties.
A convergent diastereo- and enantioselective total synthesis of anticancer and antifungal macrocyclic natural product disorazole C1 is reported. The central feature of the successful route is the application of catalytic Z-selective cross-metathesis (CM). Specifically, we illustrate that catalyst-controlled stereoselective CM can be performed to afford structurally complex Z-alkenyl-B(pin) as well as Z-alkenyl iodide compounds reliably, efficiently, and with high selectivity (pin = pinacolato). The resulting intermediates are then joined in a single-step operation through catalytic inter- and intramolecular cross-coupling to furnish the desired 30-membered ring macrocycle containing the critical (Z,Z,E)-triene moieties.
We recently introduced a direct
method for preparation of alkyl- and aryl-substituted Z-(pinacolato)alkenylboron [alkenyl–B(pin)] compounds through
catalytic stereoselective cross-metathesis (CM; e.g., i →
ii, Scheme 1);[1] these transformations proceed in the presence of terminal alkenes,
relatively robust and commercially available vinyl–B(pin),
and an in situ-generated Mo- or W-based monoaryloxide pyrrolide (MAP)
complex.[2] A benefit of the CM protocol
is that it may be combined with catalytic cross-coupling (CC)[1,3] to furnish reliable access to a range of otherwise difficult-to-obtain Z alkenes. Another critical advantage of the stereoselective
CM is that the resulting Z alkenylboron products
can be efficiently and stereoselectively converted to the corresponding
alkenyl iodides (e.g., i′ → iii). In this way, both substrates in a catalytic CC reaction to generate
a (Z,Z)-1,3-diene (cf. iv) may originate from terminal alkenes (e.g., i and i′). The proposed strategy has significant implications
vis-à-vis the design of convergent routes for synthesis of
biologically active complex molecules that contain one or more (Z,Z,E)-1,3,5-triene fragments.[4] Herein, we disclose the application of the above
plan to the diastereo- and enantioselective preparation of anticancer
and antifungal natural product disorazole C1.[5]
Scheme 1
Principal Strategy and the Targeted Natural
Product
pin = pinacolato.
Principal Strategy and the Targeted Natural
Product
pin = pinacolato.The only extant total synthesis of disorazole C1, which
also established its relative and absolute stereochemistry, is due
to the seminal work of Wipf and Graham (Scheme 2).[6] The route involved two Sonogashira-type
CC reactions (C8–C9), one performed prior to generation of
one of the ester linkages and the other carried out subsequently (C8′–C9′).
A Yamaguchi-type lactone formation furnished the macrocyclic ring;
this was followed by the unveiling of the C9–C10 and C9′–C10′ Z alkenes through partial hydrogenation of the alkyne units.
The 2004 study illustrated that any approach toward disorazole C1 and related compounds must be mindful of the sensitivity
of the polyene segments. By masking the latter moieties as ene-yne-ene
units until the last event of the total synthesis, complications were
largely sidestepped that would have otherwise negatively impacted
the final stages of the 20-step sequence.
Scheme 2
Previous Synthesis
of Disorazole C1[6]
We envisioned two approaches
for the assembly of disorazole C1 (Scheme 3). We hoped to identify convergent
pathways by utilizing the aforementioned CM and CC processes and by
exploiting the symmetric structure of the natural product. In one
route (Approach 1), a Z-alkenyl iodide (v) and a Z-alkenyl–B(pin) (vi) would be subjected to catalytic CC conditions and the resulting
(Z,Z,E)-triene
(vii) would be converted to disorazole C1 through
a double ester bond formation. In addition to the Wipf precedence,[6] synthesis of related macrocycles with diene-yne
or ene-yne-ene moieties by sequential formation of ester bonds has
been reported by Meyers[7] and Hoffmann,[8] respectively. In the earlier instance,[7] partial hydrogenation of the alkyne units was
unsuccessful and removal of silyl protecting groups could not be performed
in high yield; in the other case, data regarding reduction of alkynes
or unmasking of [2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxy]methyl (SEM) groups were
not provided.[8] Additionally, single-step
double esterification has been shown to be reasonably effective in
accessing a derivative of disorazole Z (26% yield),
although this member of the natural product family contains two Z,E,E triene groups within a 26-membered
macrocycle (vs Z,Z,E units in a 30-membered ring in disorazole C1).[9] In this latter initiative, a pair of t-Bu(Me)2Si (TBS) ethers within the macrocyclic
product could be unmasked but only in 22% yield. We hoped that with
a short and convergent route for accessing the requisite substrates,
an effective double ester bond synthesis and an appropriately mild
deprotection would be identified. The other strategy to be probed
involved double CC of a precursor such as viii (Approach
2, Scheme 3). To the best of our knowledge,
this type of a transformation has not been previously applied to the
preparation of this or related types of polyene-containing natural
products.[10] One positive attribute of the
above pathways is that closely related building blocks would be required
so that exploration of one would serve to facilitate examination of
the other.
Scheme 3
Synthesis Strategies to be Explored in This Study
We began by developing a concise
route for synthesis of alkenyl
iodide 7 (Scheme 4). Although
a related derivative of this fragment (TES vs TMS) has previously
been prepared, we opted to identify a more efficient pathway.[11] The first key operation required stereoselective
addition of an allyl unit to enantiomerically enriched aldehyde 1.[9] After screening a variety of
conditions involving assorted catalysts and reagents, we found that
use of allylsilane 2 in the presence of 5.0 mol % Sc(OTf)3, as outlined by Leighton,[12] delivered
the most desirable outcome [>98% yield, 10:1 diastereomeric ratio
(dr)]. Use of the original and closely related reagent derived from
norephedrine[13] generated a nearly equal
mixture of diastereomers.[14] Protection
of the secondary alcohol as a TMS ether (92% yield) was followed by
a Z-selective CM with vinyl–B(pin) (performed
on g-scale; 72% yield); this sequence, with complex 4a serving as the MAP complex, furnished 5 with complete Z selectivity. As long as vinyl–B(pin) was available,
none of the competitive RCM, leading to the formation of cyclohexene 6, could be detected; this was despite the conformational
rigidity provided by the gem-dimethyl unit and suggests
that B(pin)-substituted Mo alkylidene, generated preferentially,[15] serves as the propagating species (vs that derived
from the terminal alkene of TMS-protected 3). Z-Alkenyl iodide 7 was then prepared in 79%
yield (>98% Z).[16]
Scheme 4
Preparation of Z-Alkenyl Iodide Fragment 7
DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine.
Preparation of Z-Alkenyl Iodide Fragment 7
DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine.Next, we set out to identify an efficient sequence
that would furnish
(Z,E)-dienyl–B(pin) fragment 13 (Scheme 5). This task emerged as
significantly more challenging, largely because introducing the sensitive
dienyl moiety of 12 through a catalytic enantioselective
or auxiliary-based diastereoselective aldol addition with pentadienyl
aldehyde proved to be particularly difficult (extensive product decomposition
and/or inferior stereoselectivity).[17] A
relatively efficient and diastereoselective variant involving an N-acetylthiazolidinethione suffered substantial intramolecular
acylation during attempts to obtain the derived methyl ether.[17] We consequently designed an alternative scheme
that would expose the dienyl moiety through an appropriately mild
procedure at a later stage. Conversion of enantiomerically enriched
allylic alcohol 8(18) to serine-derived
amide 9 was accomplished in 3 steps and 61% overall yield
(Scheme 5). Cyclization with DAST, followed
by oxidation initiated by BrCCl3 and DBU[19] generated oxazole 10. Installation of the
1,3-diene moiety was accomplished by the following sequence: CM between 10 and commercially available 4-bromo-1-butene in the presence
of 5.0 mol % Ru carbene 11(20) and subsequent treatment with DBU to facilitate elimination.[21]E-Diene 12 was
accordingly obtained in 74% overall yield and 93% E selectivity. Catalytic CM involving 12 and vinyl–B(pin),
performed with 10 mol % in situ-generated 4a, afforded
(Z,E)-1,3-diene 13 in
76% yield and 92% Z selectivity.
TFFH = fluoro-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylformamidinium hexafluorophosphate.
DAST = (diethylamino)sulfur
trifluoride. DBU = 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene.Z-Alkenyl iodide 14 was obtained
as a single diastereomer after removal of the TMS group in 7 (85% yield).[17] Coupling of 14 with (Z,E)-1,3-dienyl–B(pin) 13 by the use of 10 mol % Pd(PPh3)4 and
1.1 equiv of Ag2O[22] generated
the desired (Z,Z,E)-triene, which was then converted to carboxylic acid 15 (Scheme 6). The latter transformation was
complete in 1.5 h, but 15 proved to be relatively unstable,
likely due to incompatibility of the sensitive triene moiety with
the acidic functionality; attempts at purification through silica
gel chromatography resulted in complete material loss. We therefore
used unpurified 15 to investigate a number of conditions,
such as those originally introduced by Yamaguchi[23] and Shiina,[24] to promote formation
of macrocyclic 16 or at least the corresponding dimeric
ester intermediate. Extensive efforts, including conditions effective
for similar intermolecular ester bond forming reactions,[25] led only to unidentifiable mixtures.
Scheme 6
Examination
of Catalytic CC/Double Ester Formation Strategy
At this point, we turned to evaluating Approach
2 (cf. Scheme 3). We were heartened by the
relative facility with
which tetraene 15 could be obtained by an intermolecular
CC process. However, after extensive screening studies, we were able
to prepare 17 in no more than 30% overall yield (from
methyl ester 13 and alcohol 14; Scheme 7a). In considering ways to improve efficiency, we
surmised that the second-stage coupling, and not the initial ester
hydrolysis, might be the problematic process. We envisioned that,
as shown in complex ix (Scheme 7a), the nucleophilicity of the purported carboxylate intermediate
might be hampered by the Lewis acidic B(pin) unit of another molecule
of the carboxylic acid derived from 13. We therefore
chose to generate the carboxylic ester bond first without the possibility
of interference by the organoboron group and then perform a Z-selective CM with vinyl–B(pin). Ester bond formation
with the carboxylic acid derived from 1,3-diene 12 and
the sizable alcohol 14 was indeed significantly more
efficient, delivering ester 18 in 83% overall yield [vs
30% with acid of alkenyl–B(pin) 13]. The stage
was thus set for catalytic CM with the highly functionalized polyene 18 (Scheme 7b), a transformation that
proceeded readily with 10 mol % Mo MAP complex 4b (cf.
Scheme 4; performed on ∼0.2 g of 18) and ∼7 equiv of vinyl–B(pin) to afford 17 with 95:5 Z/E selectivity.
Silica gel chromatography furnished (Z,E)-dienyl–B(pin) 17 in 91% yield as a single stereoisomer.
Scheme 7
Examination of Ester Bond Formation/Double CC Strategy
DCC = N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide.
Examination of Ester Bond Formation/Double CC Strategy
DCC = N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide.We searched for conditions that would allow the
single-step inter-
and intramolecular catalytic CC to provide the 30-membered ring structure
of disorazole C1. Major side products included oligomeric
compounds as well as 15-membered lactone 19 (Scheme 8), derived from intramolecular CC of 17. As might be expected, choice of Pd complex (especially to preserve
to the stereochemical integrity of the Z,Z,E trienes),[26] base, and solvent proved to be critical.[17] Our investigations eventually led us to establish
that, in the presence of 5.0 mol % Pd[(o-tol)3P]2 and 1.0 equiv of Cs2CO3 in MeOH at ambient temperature for 12 h, the catalytic double CC
is most efficient, affording 16 in 60% yield (>98%
conv).
Importantly, with MeOH as solvent, although some oligomeric products
were formed, <2% of 19 was detected.[17] The present system is more challenging than a previous
study involving the “stitching” of di(alkenyl iodide)
and a distannyl alkene, where neither reactant can undergo unimolecular
cyclization (cf. 19).[27] Moreover,
in a formerly disclosed double-CC approach to a 16-membered ring triene,
intramolecular ring closure would mean the formation of an energetically
prohibitive E,E-cyclooctadienoate.[10b]
Scheme 8
Synthesis of the Macrocycle and Completion
of the Synthesis by Catalytic
Double CC
Considering the documented
difficulties vis-à-vis deprotecting
procedures with related compounds,[7−9] we were mindful of the
remaining transformation. Significant screening was required here
as well, leading us to determine that subjection of 16 to aqueous H2SiF6 and MeOH[28] for 72 h at 4 °C could deliver disorazole C1 in 68% yield. The present approach, which relies on the combination
of catalytic CM/CC is significantly more efficient than previous approaches
utilized to access Z,E,E-triene-containing complex molecules and that entail the use of Wittig-type
processes.[29]This study illustrates
that CM reactions with high oxidation-state
MAP complexes can involve highly functionalized substrates and be
performed at relatively late stages of a multistep sequence. We show
that, in combination with catalytic CC, CM reactions furnish efficient
and stereoselective access to delicate conjugated trienes that contain
two Z alkenes and reside in acyclic or macrocyclic
natural products.[4] The total synthesis
is convergent, contains a longest linear sequence of 12 steps (8 → 12 → disorazole C1; 8.0% overall yield), and lends itself to analogue preparation.
Authors: Erik M Townsend; Stefan M Kilyanek; Richard R Schrock; Peter Müller; Stacey J Smith; Amir H Hoveyda Journal: Organometallics Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Elsie C Yu; Brett M Johnson; Erik M Townsend; Richard R Schrock; Amir H Hoveyda Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Konstantin V Bukhryakov; Richard R Schrock; Amir H Hoveyda; Peter Müller; Jonathan Becker Journal: Org Lett Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Konstantin V Bukhryakov; Sudarsan VenkatRamani; Charlene Tsay; Amir Hoveyda; Richard R Schrock Journal: Organometallics Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Kevin J Ralston; H Clinton Ramstadius; Richard C Brewster; Helen S Niblock; Alison N Hulme Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Xiao Shen; Thach T Nguyen; Ming Joo Koh; Dongmin Xu; Alexander W H Speed; Richard R Schrock; Amir H Hoveyda Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Katharina Herz; Maren Podewitz; Laura Stöhr; Dongren Wang; Wolfgang Frey; Klaus R Liedl; Suman Sen; Michael R Buchmeiser Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kevin J Ralston; H Clinton Ramstadius; Richard C Brewster; Helen S Niblock; Alison N Hulme Journal: Angew Chem Weinheim Bergstr Ger Date: 2015-04-29