| Literature DB >> 25400946 |
Kathleen Dickinson1, Maurice Place1.
Abstract
The poor levels of fitness in children with autism are prompting concern for the children's future health. This study looked to assess if a computer-based activity programme could improve fitness levels (as reflected in cardiopulmonary function) of these children, and achieve a reduction in their body mass index. In a randomised controlled trial, 50 children with autism (of which 33 were under the age of 11 years and 39 were boys) were allocated to an intervention group which encouraged them to use the Nintendo Wii and the software package "Mario and Sonics at the Olympics" in addition to their routine physical education classes. 50 children with autism (34 under the age of 11 years and 40 being boys) acted as controls. At the end of one year, analysis of the changes in scores using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on the Eurofit fitness tests showed that the intervention group had made statistically significant improvement on all tests other than flexibility. These improvements were also significantly better than controls. This type of intervention appears to be an effective addition to standard fitness training in order to help children with autism improve their fitness levels.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25400946 PMCID: PMC4220566 DOI: 10.1155/2014/419653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Autism Res Treat ISSN: 2090-1933
Fitness tests used in the study.
| Test | Area of measurement/explanation | Equipment required |
|---|---|---|
| Body mass index | Body fat measurement | Height scale and weighing scales |
|
| ||
| National Coaching Foundation (NCF), multistage fitness test-progressive shuttle run test known as the bleep or beep test. | Cardiorespiratory fitness (aerobic) VO2 max. This is a maximal test. The bleep test is a maximal exercise test to measure aerobic fitness. It involves running up and down a 20 m track in time to increasingly faster beep signals. | Test CD and CD player or MP3 download, 20 m running space, marker cones. |
|
| ||
| Standing long jump test (broad jump) | Measurement of explosive leg strength. A starting line is marked on the floor and the participants have to take a standing two-footed jump from this line with the aim to jump as far as they can. The arms may be used to aid the jump. | 2 m of space. Marker for starting line. Tape measure. Or Standing broad jump kit. |
|
| ||
| 10 × 5 m shuttle test | Measurement of speed and agility and aerobic capacity. Subjects run between two markers of 5 m; there and back counts as 1 repeat and this is continued until 10 repeats have been carried out. | Cones, tape measure to mark out 5 m, stop watch. |
|
| ||
| Partial curl up test | Measurement of abdominal strength and endurance. The child lies on the floor with knees flexed. The subject curls up his/her trunk then lowers back to the floor, repeating this as many times as they can. The test lasts for duration of 30 seconds. | Mat for the child to lie on. Stop watch. Additional person to hold legs or time test. |
|
| ||
| Sit and reach test | Test measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles, that is, hip flexibility. The test involves sitting on the floor with legs out straight ahead and then reaching as far forward as possible. | Sit and reach board/equipment or tape measure. |
The demographic information of the sample.
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Boys | ||
| ≤10 yrs | 27 | 27 |
| ≥11 yrs | 12 | 13 |
| Girls | ||
| ≤10 yrs | 6 | 7 |
| ≥11 yrs | 5 | 3 |
| Only child | 9 | 25 |
| Living with both parents | 35 | 40 |
| Both parents working | 7 | 9 |
| Both parents unemployed | 13 | 12 |
Initial and follow-up fitness results as medians and interquartile range (IQR) scores (Z calculated using Wilcoxon signed rank test between time samples and Mann Whitney U for difference between initial scores of control and intervention groups).
| Control group | Intervention group | Difference between initial scores of control and intervention groups ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IRQ) | Difference between initial and follow-up scores ( | Median (IRQ) | Difference between initial and follow-up scores ( | ||||
| Initial score | Follow-up score | Initial score | Follow-up score | ||||
| Body mass index (BMI) | 20.2 (5.6) | 21.5 (5.5) | 4.86∗∗∗ | 20.1 (6.1) | 19.8 (5.6) | −5.37∗∗∗ | 0.72 |
| Bleep test | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 1.61 | 3 (4) | 4.5 (5) | 5.92∗∗∗ | 2.52∗ |
| Shuttle run | 84.5 (49) | 90 (42) | 4.04∗∗∗ | 92 (27) | 68 (43) | −4.89∗∗∗ | 2.33∗ |
| Broad jump | 54.5 (23) | 52.5 (20) | −0.77 | 80 (41) | 92.5 (50) | 5.12∗∗∗ | 4.59∗∗∗ |
| Sit-ups | 7.5 (5) | 7.5 (4) | 1.94 | 10 (10) | 13 (7) | 5.08∗∗∗ | 2.27∗ |
| Flexibility | 10 (6) | 10 (8) | 2.48∗ | 8 (13) | 9 (13) | 0.09 | 2.05∗ |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Comparison of changes to fitness scores between the control and intervention groups (F calculated using ANCOVA with fixed factors of age and gender).
| Number of children showing improvement in score | Significance in difference of degree of change between control and intervention groups ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | Intervention group ( | ||
| VO2 max | 13 | 43 | 16.13∗∗∗ |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 4 | 39 | 30.06∗∗∗ |
| Bleep test | 13 | 43 | 13.15∗∗∗ |
| Shuttle run | 8 | 46 | 41.35∗∗∗ |
| Broad jump | 18 | 39 | 40.30∗∗∗ |
| Sit-ups | 9 | 38 | 25.72∗∗∗ |
| Flexibility | 4 | 4 | 1.20 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.