Zahir Vally1, Lynne Murray1,2, Mark Tomlinson2, Peter J Cooper1,2. 1. School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Winnicott Research Unit, University of Reading, Reading, UK. 2. Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dialogic book-sharing is an interactive form of shared reading. It has been shown in high income countries (HICs) to be of significant benefit to child cognitive development. Evidence for such benefit in low and middle income countries (LMICs) is scarce, although a feasibility study of our own produced encouraging findings. Accordingly, we aimed to establish the impact on child language and attention of providing training in dialogic booksharing to carers of infants in an impoverished South African community. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Khayelitsha, an informal settlement in South Africa. Mothers of infants aged between 14 and 16 months were recruited and randomized to either 8 weeks of manualized training in dialogic book-sharing or a no-intervention control group. Independent assessments were made of infant language and attention at baseline and following training. The trial was registered (ISRCTN39953901). RESULTS:Ninety one carer-infant dyads were recruited and randomized to the intervention group (n = 49) or the control group (n = 42), 82 (90%) of whom were available for follow-up assessments. On a standardized carer report of infant vocabulary, compared to those in the control group, carers who received the intervention reported a significantly greater increase in the number of words understood by their infants as well as a larger increase in the number of words that their infant understood and could vocalize. Intervention group children also showed substantially greater gains on a measure of sustained attention. CONCLUSIONS: In line with evidence from HICs, a dialogic book-sharing programme delivered to an impoverished South African sample was shown to be of considerable benefit to the development of child language and focussed attention. The training programme, which is simple and inexpensive to deliver, has the potential to benefit child cognitive development in LMIC contexts where such development is commonly compromised.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Dialogic book-sharing is an interactive form of shared reading. It has been shown in high income countries (HICs) to be of significant benefit to child cognitive development. Evidence for such benefit in low and middle income countries (LMICs) is scarce, although a feasibility study of our own produced encouraging findings. Accordingly, we aimed to establish the impact on child language and attention of providing training in dialogic booksharing to carers of infants in an impoverished South African community. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Khayelitsha, an informal settlement in South Africa. Mothers of infants aged between 14 and 16 months were recruited and randomized to either 8 weeks of manualized training in dialogic book-sharing or a no-intervention control group. Independent assessments were made of infant language and attention at baseline and following training. The trial was registered (ISRCTN39953901). RESULTS: Ninety one carer-infant dyads were recruited and randomized to the intervention group (n = 49) or the control group (n = 42), 82 (90%) of whom were available for follow-up assessments. On a standardized carer report of infant vocabulary, compared to those in the control group, carers who received the intervention reported a significantly greater increase in the number of words understood by their infants as well as a larger increase in the number of words that their infant understood and could vocalize. Intervention group children also showed substantially greater gains on a measure of sustained attention. CONCLUSIONS: In line with evidence from HICs, a dialogic book-sharing programme delivered to an impoverished South African sample was shown to be of considerable benefit to the development of child language and focussed attention. The training programme, which is simple and inexpensive to deliver, has the potential to benefit child cognitive development in LMIC contexts where such development is commonly compromised.
Authors: Susan P Walker; Theodore D Wachs; Julie Meeks Gardner; Betsy Lozoff; Gail A Wasserman; Ernesto Pollitt; Julie A Carter Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Heidi M Feldman; Philip S Dale; Thomas F Campbell; D Kathleen Colborn; Marcia Kurs-Lasky; Howard E Rockette; Jack L Paradise Journal: Child Dev Date: 2005 Jul-Aug
Authors: Sally Grantham-McGregor; Yin Bun Cheung; Santiago Cueto; Paul Glewwe; Linda Richter; Barbara Strupp Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mark Tomlinson; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Ingrid M le Roux; Maryann Youssef; Sandahl H Nelson; Aaron Scheffler; Robert E Weiss; Mary O'Connor; Carol M Worthman Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2016-11
Authors: John S Hutton; Kieran Phelan; Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Jonathan Dudley; Mekibib Altaye; Tom DeWitt; Scott K Holland Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Manuel E Jimenez; Alan L Mendelsohn; Yong Lin; Patricia Shelton; Nancy Reichman Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Lynne Murray; Leonardo De Pascalis; Mark Tomlinson; Zahir Vally; Harold Dadomo; Brenda MacLachlan; Charlotte Woodward; Peter J Cooper Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 8.982