Literature DB >> 25398975

How much to trust the senses: likelihood learning.

Yoshiyuki Sato1, Konrad P Kording2.   

Abstract

Our brain often needs to estimate unknown variables from imperfect information. Our knowledge about the statistical distributions of quantities in our environment (called priors) and currently available information from sensory inputs (called likelihood) are the basis of all Bayesian models of perception and action. While we know that priors are learned, most studies of prior-likelihood integration simply assume that subjects know about the likelihood. However, as the quality of sensory inputs change over time, we also need to learn about new likelihoods. Here, we show that human subjects readily learn the distribution of visual cues (likelihood function) in a way that can be predicted by models of statistically optimal learning. Using a likelihood that depended on color context, we found that a learned likelihood generalized to new priors. Thus, we conclude that subjects learn about likelihood.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian models; context-dependent learning; likelihood learning; sensorimotor integration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398975      PMCID: PMC4233767          DOI: 10.1167/14.13.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  29 in total

1.  Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs; I Fine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Bayesian approaches to sensory integration for motor control.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-02-09

6.  Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Sato; Taro Toyoizumi; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Colored context cues can facilitate the ability to learn and to switch between multiple dynamical force fields.

Authors:  Touria Addou; Nedialko Krouchev; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Wada; Yasuhiro Kawabata; Shinya Kotosaka; Kenji Yamamoto; Shigeru Kitazawa; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  13 in total

1.  Sensorimotor priors are effector dependent.

Authors:  Cong Yin; Huijun Wang; Kunlin Wei; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance.

Authors:  Marta Suárez-Pinilla; Anil K Seth; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Acquisition of visual priors and induced hallucinations in chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Vincent Valton; Povilas Karvelis; Katie L Richards; Aaron R Seitz; Stephen M Lawrie; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Prem Jareonsettasin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Learning and inference using complex generative models in a spatial localization task.

Authors:  Vikranth R Bejjanki; David C Knill; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.

Authors:  Tricia L Gibo; Winfred Mugge; David A Abbink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  No exception from Bayes' rule: The presence and absence of the range effect for saccades explained.

Authors:  André Krügel; Lars Rothkegel; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Normative evidence accumulation in unpredictable environments.

Authors:  Christopher M Glaze; Joseph W Kable; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Autistic traits, but not schizotypy, predict increased weighting of sensory information in Bayesian visual integration.

Authors:  Povilas Karvelis; Aaron R Seitz; Stephen M Lawrie; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.