Literature DB >> 20398449

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.

Iqbal Singh1, Ashok K Hemal.   

Abstract

AIM: To review the global select data on the current technique, perioperative outcome and literature on the robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP).
METHODS: The published English literature (PubMed) was extensively searched using the key words; robot, robot-assisted pyeloplasty, laparoscopy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The selected studies were then reviewed, tracked and analyzed in order to determine the current role, outcome and status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
RESULTS: The search yielded about 25 published series on RAP comprising about 740 cases with a mean operative time, estimated blood loss, crossing vessel prevalence, hospital stay,perioperative complication rate and follow up duration of 194 min, 50 mL, 47%, 2.3 days, 6% and 14.9 months respectively.
CONCLUSION: The initial peri-operative results and intermediate follow up of cases of repair of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction with robot-assisted pyeloplasty appear to be favorable and comparable to that of open pyeloplasty, while long term outcome data is still awaited. The da Vinci surgical robotic system is a promising surgical armamentarium in the hands of the modern day urologist for the minimally invasive definitive surgical management of both primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  6 in total

1.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty].

Authors:  M Traumann; L A Kluth; M Schmid; C Meyer; B Schwaiger; C Rosenbaum; P Schriefer; M Fisch; R Dahlem; D Seiler; S Ahyai; A Haese; F K-H Chun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty:recent developments in efficacy, outcomes, and new techniques.

Authors:  Casey A Seideman; Aditya Bagrodia; Jeffrey Gahan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Julie C Lai; Rachana Seelam; Janet M Hanley; J Stuart Wolf; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Passing from open to robotic surgery for dismembered pyeloplasty: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Marcelo Di Gregorio; Andrei Botnaru; Laurent Bairy; Francis Lorge
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-10-03

5.  Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era.

Authors:  Mario F Chammas; Anuar I Mitre; Marco A Arap; Nicholas Hubert; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  David D Thiel
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.