Literature DB >> 12350499

Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system.

Matthew T Gettman1, Richard Neururer, Georg Bartsch, Reinhard Peschel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate and describe the use of the da Vinci robotic system in performing laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Between June 2001 and February 2002, 9 patients underwent laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty with the da Vinci telerobotic surgical system. The diagnosis was based on the presenting symptoms and radiologic imaging findings. The technique for da Vinci-assisted Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty followed the same steps as for conventional laparoscopy. Three transperitoneal laparoscopic ports were required for the robotic system, and a fourth laparoscopic port was used by the assistant for retraction, suction, and introduction of suture. The operative time, suturing time, perioperative complications, and success rates were prospectively evaluated. The mean operative time was 138.8 minutes (range 80 to 215), and the mean suturing time was 62.4 minutes (range 40 to 115). No intraoperative complications or open conversions were required. The estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL in all cases. The mean length of hospitalization was 4.7 days (range 4 to 11). Postoperatively, 1 (11.1%) of 9 patients required open exploration to repair a defect in the renal pelvis. At a mean follow-up of 4.1 months (range less than 1 to 8), all procedures were successful on the basis of the subjective and radiographic data.
CONCLUSIONS: All aspects of laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty were performed using the da Vinci robotic system. da Vinci-assisted procedures resulted in favorable overall operative times, suturing times, perioperative complications, and available success rates, but additional clinical experience is required. Ongoing clinical application of robotic technology in a controlled scientific manner is needed to gauge the effectiveness of this method completely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350499     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01761-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  38 in total

1.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty].

Authors:  M Traumann; L A Kluth; M Schmid; C Meyer; B Schwaiger; C Rosenbaum; P Schriefer; M Fisch; R Dahlem; D Seiler; S Ahyai; A Haese; F K-H Chun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ketan K Badani; Ashok K Hemal; Michael Fumo; Sanjeev Kaul; Alok Shrivastava; Arumuga Kumar Rajendram; Noor Ashani Yusoff; Murali Sundram; Susan Woo; James O Peabody; Sahabudin Raja Mohamed; Mani Menon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Robotic technology in urology.

Authors:  D Murphy; B Challacombe; M S Khan; P Dasgupta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Pathophysiology and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Brent Williams; Basir Tareen; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Wassilios Bentas; Marc Wolfram; Ronald Bräutigam; Michael Probst; Wolf-Dietrich Beecken; Dietger Jonas; Jochen Binder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Douglas Quan; Ibrahim Al-Ghamdi; Firas El-Deen; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty:recent developments in efficacy, outcomes, and new techniques.

Authors:  Casey A Seideman; Aditya Bagrodia; Jeffrey Gahan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Omeed Paydar; Anna Tao; Megan LaRocca; Kang Liu; Bradley Genovese; Robert Candler; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.