Literature DB >> 25389057

Minimally invasive pancreatectomy for cancer: a critical review of the current literature.

Trenton L Place1, Peter Nau, James J Mezhir.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed operative practices by offering patients procedures with reduced hospital stay and recovery compared to that of open operations. In spite of the advantages of a MIS approach, the application to pancreatectomy has only recently emerged. This review aims to analyze and discuss available comparative studies as they relate to resection techniques for treatment of malignant disease. A PubMed search was used to obtain original studies and meta-analyses relating to MIS pancreatectomy from 2008 to 2013. Several studies were identified that reported on the application of MIS specifically to the treatment of cancer, many of which were retrospective, single-institution studies. Notwithstanding an inherent selection bias, several studies suggest that MIS can provide equivalent R0 resection rates, number of lymph nodes harvested, and survival to that of open resection. Furthermore, parameters such as blood loss and length of stay are significantly reduced in patients treated with MIS. The current literature supports the conclusion that MIS is safe and effective as a treatment for cancer in well-selected patients in the hands of experienced surgeons. However, the published studies to date are observational in nature and therefore higher quality studies will be needed to support the application and generalizability of MIS in the treatment of pancreatic malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389057     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2695-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  61 in total

1.  How to write an evidence-based clinical review article.

Authors:  Jay Siwek; Margaret L Gourlay; David C Slawson; Allen F Shaughnessy
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.292

2.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mohammed Hamdan; Francesco Di Fabio; Neil W Pearce; Colin D Johnson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

6.  Near-infrared fluorescence imaging in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Hutteman; J R van der Vorst; J S D Mieog; B A Bonsing; H H Hartgrink; P J K Kuppen; C W G M Löwik; J V Frangioni; C J H van de Velde; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 7.  The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Josh Winer; Mehmet F Can; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate?

Authors:  David A Kooby; William G Hawkins; C Max Schmidt; Sharon M Weber; David J Bentrem; Theresa W Gillespie; Johnita Byrd Sellers; Nipun B Merchant; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C G Martin; Hong Jin Kim; Syed Ahmad; Clifford S Cho; Alexander A Parikh; Carrie K Chu; Nicholas A Hamilton; Courtney J Doyle; Scott Pinchot; Amanda Hayman; Rebecca McClaine; Attila Nakeeb; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 10.  Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Wen-Ming Wu; Lei You; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Why the Resistance: Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Saving the Patient from Tigers.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Neeraj Dhamija; Shruti Sharma; Sneh Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Kristopher Attwood; Steven J Nurkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.

Authors:  Georgios D Lianos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Christos Katsios; Georgios K Glantzounis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-06

5.  Technical considerations for the fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Galvez; Rebecca Sorber; Ammar A Javed; Jin He
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Comparative Study.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Bin Zhou; Tao Wang; Xiao Hu; Yongqiang Ye; Weidong Guo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in an annular pancreas: a case report.

Authors:  Shinichiro Kobayashi; Yukio Kamohara; Yasuhiro Nagata; Masahiro Ito; Hikaru Fujioka
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.