Paul L Reiter1, Annie-Laurie McRee2. 1. Assistant Professor, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; and College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Assistant Professor, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; and College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lesbian and bisexual women are at risk for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical disease. We examined cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) behaviours among these women and their acceptability of HPV self-testing at home, a potential cervical cancer screening strategy. METHODS: We analysed data from a national sample of lesbian and bisexual women aged 21-26 years (n=418) who completed our online survey in Autumn 2013. Logistic regression identified correlates of (1) having had a Pap test in the last 3 years and (2) willingness to use an HPV self-test at home. RESULTS: About 70% of women had undergone a Pap test in the last 3 years. Pap testing was more common among women who had disclosed their sexual orientation to their health care provider [odds ratio (OR)=2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-3.95] and less common among women who self-identified as lesbian (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.93). Just over half the women (51%) were willing to use an HPV self-test at home. Women were more willing to use an HPV self-test at home if they were older (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.30) or reported higher levels of worry about getting an HPV-related disease (OR=1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.63). The most common concerns about HPV self-testing at home were using the test incorrectly (70%) and test accuracy (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Many young lesbian and bisexual women have not had a recent Pap test. HPV self-testing at home may be a promising future strategy for reaching and screening these women. Findings highlight beliefs and concerns that could be addressed by self-test programmes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: Lesbian and bisexual women are at risk for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical disease. We examined cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) behaviours among these women and their acceptability of HPV self-testing at home, a potential cervical cancer screening strategy. METHODS: We analysed data from a national sample of lesbian and bisexual women aged 21-26 years (n=418) who completed our online survey in Autumn 2013. Logistic regression identified correlates of (1) having had a Pap test in the last 3 years and (2) willingness to use an HPV self-test at home. RESULTS: About 70% of women had undergone a Pap test in the last 3 years. Pap testing was more common among women who had disclosed their sexual orientation to their health care provider [odds ratio (OR)=2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-3.95] and less common among women who self-identified as lesbian (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.93). Just over half the women (51%) were willing to use an HPV self-test at home. Women were more willing to use an HPV self-test at home if they were older (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.30) or reported higher levels of worry about getting an HPV-related disease (OR=1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.63). The most common concerns about HPV self-testing at home were using the test incorrectly (70%) and test accuracy (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Many young lesbian and bisexual women have not had a recent Pap test. HPV self-testing at home may be a promising future strategy for reaching and screening these women. Findings highlight beliefs and concerns that could be addressed by self-test programmes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
cervical screening; human papillomavirus; sexually transmitted infections
Authors: Brittany M Charlton; Heather L Corliss; Stacey A Missmer; A Lindsay Frazier; Margaret Rosario; Jessica A Kahn; S Bryn Austin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Robin C Vanderpool; Maudella G Jones; Lindsay R Stradtman; Jennifer S Smith; Richard A Crosby Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Nicole Liddon; Lauri Markowitz; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Alice R Richman; Noel T Brewer; Aliza K Liebman; Allen C Rinas; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2010-11-28 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Susan Hariri; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Eileen F Dunne; David Swan; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake; Tyler Zemla; Aminah Jatoi; Kathryn E Weaver; Heather Neuman; Anne E Kazak; Ruth Carlos; Lucy Gansauer; Joseph M Unger; Nicholas M Pajewski; Charles Kamen Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; Susan T Vadaparampil; Giang T Nguyen; B Lee Green; Peter A Kanetsky; Matthew B Schabath Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Brynne E Presser; Mira L Katz; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah Moore; Mack T Ruffin; Electra D Paskett; Paul L Reiter Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Paul L Reiter; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah McDonough; Mack T Ruffin; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger; Electra D Paskett; Mira L Katz Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Constance Mao; Shalini L Kulasingam; Hilary K Whitham; Stephen E Hawes; John Lin; Nancy B Kiviat Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Salimah H Meghani; Marilyn S Sommers; Tonda L Hughes Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 2.388