Literature DB >> 28074444

Effects of an Education Intervention about HPV Self-Testing for Healthcare Providers and Staff.

Brynne E Presser1, Mira L Katz2,3,4, Abigail B Shoben2,4, Deborah Moore5, Mack T Ruffin6, Electra D Paskett2,3,4, Paul L Reiter7,8,9.   

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing is an emerging cervical cancer screening strategy, yet efforts to educate healthcare providers and staff about HPV self-testing are lacking. We report the findings of a brief education intervention about HPV self-testing for healthcare providers and staff. We conducted education sessions during 2015 with healthcare providers and staff (n = 33) from five federally qualified health centers located in Appalachian Ohio. Participants attended a one-time session and completed pre- and post-intervention surveys. Analyses for paired data assessed changes in knowledge and beliefs about HPV, HPV-related disease, and HPV self-testing. The intervention increased participants' knowledge and affected many of the beliefs examined. Participants answered an average of 4.67 of six knowledge items correctly on pre-intervention surveys and 5.82 items correctly on post-intervention surveys (p < 0.001). The proportion of participants who answered all six knowledge items correctly increased substantially (pre-intervention =9% vs. post-intervention =82%, p < 0.001). Compared to pre-intervention surveys, participants more strongly believed on post-intervention surveys that it is important to examine HPV self-testing as a potential cervical cancer screening strategy, that their female patients would be willing to use an HPV self-test at home by themselves, and that they have the knowledge to talk with their patients about HPV self-testing (all p < 0.05). A brief education intervention can be a viable approach for increasing knowledge and affecting beliefs about HPV self-testing among healthcare providers and staff. Findings will be valuable for planning and developing future HPV self-test interventions that include an education component for healthcare providers and staff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; HPV; Screening; Women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28074444      PMCID: PMC5503812          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1164-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  20 in total

Review 1.  Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Verdoodt; M Jentschke; P Hillemanns; C S Racey; P J F Snijders; M Arbyn
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea R Spence; Patricia Goggin; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: an exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia.

Authors:  Robin C Vanderpool; Maudella G Jones; Lindsay R Stradtman; Jennifer S Smith; Richard A Crosby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Perceptions of mailed HPV self-testing among women at higher risk for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kayoll V Galbraith; Melissa B Gilkey; Jennifer S Smith; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

6.  A brief educational intervention increases providers' human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; Mahbubur Rahman; Jacqueline M Hirth; Richard E Rupp; Kwabena O Sarpong
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Optimising human papillomavirus self-testing for high risk women.

Authors:  Alice R Richman; Noel T Brewer; Aliza K Liebman; Allen C Rinas; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2006.

Authors:  Susan Hariri; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Eileen F Dunne; David Swan; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Freija Verdoodt; Peter J F Snijders; Viola M J Verhoef; Eero Suonio; Lena Dillner; Silvia Minozzi; Cristina Bellisario; Rita Banzi; Fang-Hui Zhao; Peter Hillemanns; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  HPV prevalence among women from Appalachia: results from the CARE project.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Mack T Ruffin; Erinn M Hade; Cecilia R DeGraffenreid; Divya A Patel; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Examining Acceptability of Self-Collection for Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women and Healthcare Providers with a Broader Lens.

Authors:  Virginia Senkomago; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Perspectives on self-sampling for cancer screening among rural and urban women: Multilevel factors related to acceptability.

Authors:  Kelsey C Stoltzfus; Madyson L Popalis; Paul L Reiter; Jennifer L Moss
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Advances in Designing and Developing Vaccines, Drugs and Therapeutic Approaches to Counter Human Papilloma Virus.

Authors:  Maryam Dadar; Sandip Chakraborty; Kuldeep Dhama; Minakshi Prasad; Rekha Khandia; Sameer Hassan; Ashok Munjal; Ruchi Tiwari; Kumaragurubaran Karthik; Deepak Kumar; Hafiz M N Iqbal; Wanpen Chaicumpa
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.561

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.