Literature DB >> 28807952

Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: Focused literature review.

Tina R Madzima1, Mandana Vahabi2, Aisha Lofters3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a focused critical review of the literature on the acceptability, feasibility, and uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among hard-to-reach women. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A focused search to obtain relevant literature published in English between 1997 and 2015 was done using PubMed and EMBASE using search terms including HPV self-test or HPV self-sample or HPV kit in combination with acceptability or feasibility. Only studies that focused on never-screened or underscreened populations were included in this review. MAIN MESSAGE: Human papillomavirus self-sampling was found to be highly acceptable and feasible among these hard-to-reach women across most studies. Mailing of self-sampling kits has been shown to increase participation among hard-to reach women. Some concerns remain regarding adherence to further follow-up among high-risk women with positive test results for HPV after screening.
CONCLUSION: There is a strong body of evidence to support the usefulness of HPV self-sampling in increasing participation of hard-to-reach women in screening programs (level I evidence). Convenience, privacy, ease of use, and, likely, cost-effectiveness of HPV self-sampling are driving forces in its emerging role in cervical cancer screening among hard-to-reach women. Key barriers to participation could be addressed by overcoming disparities in HPV-related knowledge and perceptions about cervical cancer screening. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28807952      PMCID: PMC5555324     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  52 in total

1.  Self-test device for cytology and HPV testing in rural Appalachian women: an evaluation.

Authors:  Andrew P Soisson; Eddie Reed; Pamela Brown; Barbara Ducatman; Julie Armistead; Stephanie Kennedy; Weixen Wang; Paul Kramer; Susan Rose
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist?

Authors:  Agnes T Black; Anne McCulloch; Ruth Elwood Martin; Lisa Kan
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2011-03

3.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  'Before you teach me, I cannot know': immigrant women's barriers and enablers with regard to cervical cancer screening among different ethnolinguistic groups in Canada.

Authors:  Lynda Redwood-Campbell; Nancy Fowler; Stephanie Laryea; Michelle Howard; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2011 May-Jun

5.  Women's views on human papillomavirus self-sampling: focus groups to assess acceptability, invitation letters and a test kit in the Australian setting.

Authors:  Farhana Sultana; Robyn Mullins; Michael Murphy; Dallas R English; Julie A Simpson; Kelly T Drennan; Stella Heley; C David Wrede; Julia M L Brotherton; Marion Saville; Dorota M Gertig
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Feasibility of Cervical Cancer Screening Utilizing Self-sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Mexican Immigrant Women in Harris County, Texas: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Patricia D Mullen; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Maria M Vargas Mendez; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

7.  Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Tapio Luostarinen; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J Waller; M Jackowska; L Marlow; J Wardle
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.

Authors:  C Sarai Racey; Dionne C Gesink; Ann N Burchell; Suzanne Trivers; Tom Wong; Anu Rebbapragada
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Determinants of women's likelihood of vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus to screen for cervical cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Chen; Pao-Chun Hsieh; Chia-Hui Chou; Ya-Ling Tzeng
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  31 in total

1.  Home Self-Collection by Mail to Test for Human Papillomavirus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Andrea C Des Marais; Yuqian Zhao; Marcia M Hobbs; Vijay Sivaraman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Advances in technologies for cervical cancer detection in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Kathryn A Kundrod; Chelsey A Smith; Brady Hunt; Richard A Schwarz; Kathleen Schmeler; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: Empowering women to lead a paradigm change in cancer control.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Implementation considerations using HPV self-collection to reach women under-screened for cervical cancer in high-income settings.

Authors:  H N Pedersen; L W Smith; C Sarai Racey; D Cook; M Krajden; D van Niekerk; G S Ogilvie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Results of a Pilot Study of a Mail-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing Program for Underscreened Women From Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah McDonough; Mack T Ruffin; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger; Electra D Paskett; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Strategies to reach marginalized women for cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  B Wood; A Lofters; M Vahabi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kilfoyle; Andrea C Des Marais; Mai Anh Ngo; LaHoma Romocki; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Lisa Rahangdale; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Perspectives on self-sampling for cancer screening among rural and urban women: Multilevel factors related to acceptability.

Authors:  Kelsey C Stoltzfus; Madyson L Popalis; Paul L Reiter; Jennifer L Moss
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.

Authors:  Holly Nishimura; Ping Teresa Yeh; Habibat Oguntade; Caitlin E Kennedy; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

10.  Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.