Literature DB >> 21115503

Optimising human papillomavirus self-testing for high risk women.

Alice R Richman1, Noel T Brewer, Aliza K Liebman, Allen C Rinas, Jennifer S Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus self-tests that can be used at home and returned by mail may increase cervical cancer screening rates. Growing evidence suggests that self-test methods could increase screening for high-risk and hard-to-reach populations. The purpose of this study was to identify which self-test device women prefer and why.
METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with 30 high-risk women in two rural and two urban counties in North Carolina. Women evaluated three self-test devices: the Pantarhei screener (a lavage that releases liquid into the vagina and re-collects fluid), the Qiagen cervical brush (a brush that women insert into the vagina and is turned around to collect cells) and the Fournier cervical self-sampling device (a tampon-like plastic wand).
RESULTS: The majority of women reported that they would use the brush (70%), followed by the wand (67%) and the lavage (43%). Women from urban areas appeared to prefer the brush, whereas women from rural areas endorsed the wand. Women reported liking the lavage because it seemed easy to use; they liked the wand because of its inviting colour (green), and liked the brush because of its small size and familiarity. Women reported disliking the lavage because the liquid seemed messy and unsanitary, disliked the wand due to the 15-20 recommended turns, and disliked the brush because it was short and the tip seemed abrasive.
CONCLUSIONS: No one device was perfect, although suggestions for an optimal self-test most resembled the brush. These findings can be used to develop an optimal self-test collector for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21115503     DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.046326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  10 in total

1.  Effects of an Education Intervention about HPV Self-Testing for Healthcare Providers and Staff.

Authors:  Brynne E Presser; Mira L Katz; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah Moore; Mack T Ruffin; Electra D Paskett; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Results of a Pilot Study of a Mail-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing Program for Underscreened Women From Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah McDonough; Mack T Ruffin; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger; Electra D Paskett; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) behaviours and acceptability of human papillomavirus self-testing among lesbian and bisexual women aged 21-26 years in the USA.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-11-10

4.  Dry storage and transport of a cervicovaginal self-sample by use of the Evalyn Brush, providing reliable human papillomavirus detection combined with comfort for women.

Authors:  Romy van Baars; Remko P Bosgraaf; Bram W A ter Harmsel; Willem J G Melchers; Wim G V Quint; Ruud L M Bekkers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Cervical cancer screening through human papillomavirus testing in community health campaigns versus health facilities in rural western Kenya.

Authors:  Megan J Huchko; Saduma Ibrahim; Cinthia Blat; Craig R Cohen; Jennifer S Smith; Robert A Hiatt; Elizabeth Bukusi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Uptake and correlates of cervical cancer screening among women attending a community-based multi-disease health campaign in Kenya.

Authors:  Yujung Choi; Saduma Ibrahim; Lawrence P Park; Craig R Cohen; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Megan J Huchko
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected specimens: perceptions among HIV positive women attending rural and urban clinics in South Africa.

Authors:  Kay Mahomed; Denise Evans; Celeste Sauls; Karin Richter; Jennifer Smith; Cindy Firnhaber
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-03-11

8.  Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Among a National Sample of Women in the United States.

Authors:  Erin Bishop; Mira L Katz; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2019-04-30

9.  Self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening: a qualitative evidence meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Hawa Camara; Ye Zhang; Lise Lafferty; Andrew J Vallely; Rebecca Guy; Angela Kelly-Hanku
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Comparison of Different Self-Sampling Devices for Molecular Detection of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs): A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Illari Sechi; Cocuzza Clementina Elvezia; Marianna Martinelli; Narcisa Muresu; Santina Castriciano; Giovanni Sotgiu; Andrea Piana
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.