Literature DB >> 25385264

2D phase contrast blood flow velocity measurements of the thoracic vasculature: comparison of the effect of gadofosveset trisodium and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Marcus R Makowski1, Andrea J Wiethoff, Hans U Ebersberger, René M Botnar, Reza Razavi, Tobias Schaeffter, Gerald F Greil.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study is to compare the performance of 2D time-resolved phase-contrast (PC) MRI prior to and after the administration of an intravascular (gadofosveset-trisodium) and extravascular (gadopentetate-dimeglumine) contrast agent in the same patient in the cardiovascular system. This study was approved by the ethics committee (Study-Number-07/Q0704/2) and registered with the MedicinesAndHealthcareProductsRegulatoryAgency (MHRA-Study-Number-28482/0002/001-0001, EudraCT-Number-2006-007042). All patients signed an informed consent. 20 patients were examined using a 1.5T MR-scanner and 32-channel-coil-technology. Gadopentetate-dimeglumine (GdD) and gadofosveset-trisodium (GdT) were administered in the same patient on consecutive days. Image quality, velocity-to-noise-ratios (VNRs) and standard-deviation of blood-flow-velocities (phase-noise) were compared between GdT, GdD and non-contrast-enhanced imaging. On both days pre- and post-contrast-scans were performed. The administration of GdT significantly improved the delineation of the perfused lumen and the VNR compared to GdD and non-contrast-enhanced imaging. Standard deviations of through-plane and in-plane velocity-measurements (phase-noise) were significantly reduced after GdT administration (p < 0.05). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were measured regarding absolute flow values prior to and after the administration of GdD and GdT. PC flow imaging benefits from the administration of an intravascular contrast agent by improving the delineation of the perfused lumen and reducing phase noise in flow measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385264     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0565-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  35 in total

Review 1.  MR measurement of blood flow in the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  G H Mostbeck; G R Caputo; C B Higgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Reduced data acquisition methods in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Kozerke; Jeffrey Tsao
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-06

3.  In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: precision, accuracy, and signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Joachim Lotz; Rolf Döker; Ralph Noeske; Meike Schüttert; Roland Felix; Michael Galanski; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerd Peter Meyer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Inflow quantification in three-dimensional cardiovascular MR imaging.

Authors:  Reza Nezafat; Daniel Herzka; Christian Stehning; Dana C Peters; Kay Nehrke; Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization.

Authors:  Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Aurélien F Stalder; Thorsten A Bley; Hans Burkhardt; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison of respiratory suppression methods and navigator locations for MR coronary angiography.

Authors:  M V McConnell; V C Khasgiwala; B J Savord; M H Chen; M L Chuang; R R Edelman; W J Manning
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery endothelial function in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Allison G Hays; Glenn A Hirsch; Sebastian Kelle; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Contrast agent-enhanced, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  M Stuber; R M Botnar; P G Danias; M V McConnell; K V Kissinger; E K Yucel; W J Manning
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies.

Authors:  Gerald F Greil; Andrew J Powell; Hans P Gildein; Tal Geva
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Comparison of intravascular and extracellular contrast media for absolute quantification of myocardial rest-perfusion using high-resolution MRI.

Authors:  Christian O Ritter; Aline Wilke; Tobias Wichmann; Meinrad Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis.

Authors:  Amir Fathi; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Allan D Struthers; Brian J Lipworth; Graeme Houston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.