Literature DB >> 21626452

Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.

Yuu Tanaka1, Takafumi Wakita, Shunichi Fukuhara, Makoto Nishiwada, Satoki Inoue, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Hitoshi Furuya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The quality of recovery score QoR-40 is a recovery-specific and patient-rated questionnaire to assess the early postoperative health status of patients. However, the Japanese version of the QoR40 has not been established. The aim of this study was to validate the quality of recovery 40 Japanese version (the QoR-40J) according to the methods adopted by the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project.
METHODS: After obtaining ethics committee approval and consent, 192 general and otological surgical patients were studied. The QoR-40J was used to measure postoperative health status on day 3 and 1 month after surgery. The level of quality of life was also evaluated using a general, health-related quality of life questionnaire (Short-Form Health Survey-36 sub-scales; SF-36), at 1 month after the surgery. Psychometric analysis including the following properties: test-retest reliability, internal consistency, predictive validity, and measurement of responsiveness, was performed to validate the QoR-40J.
RESULTS: Test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation coefficient) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the QoR-40J were 0.887 and 0.91, respectively. A significant relationship was observed between the total QoR-40J score and duration of hospitalization (r = -0.291) and between the global QoR-40J score and postoperative scores of the SF-36 sub-scales (physical function, ρ = 0.287; vital score, ρ = 0.349). The standardized mean of the QoR-40J, a measurement of responsiveness, was 0.70.
CONCLUSION: The results of the psychometric analysis indicated that the QoR-40J has characteristics of acceptable validity, reliability, and responsiveness in clinical practice in Japan. The QoR-40J may aid in evaluating the quality of recovery after surgery or the quality of methods of anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626452     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  P S Myles; J O Hunt; H Fletcher; R Solly; D Woodward; S Kelly
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.

Authors:  J N Katz; M G Larson; C B Phillips; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia.

Authors:  James E Bost; Brian A Williams; Matthew T Bottegal; Qianyu Dang; Doris M Rubio
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

Authors:  P S Myles; J O Hunt; C E Nightingale; H Fletcher; T Beh; D Tanil; A Nagy; A Rubinstein; J L Ponsford
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; S Bito; J Green; A Hsiao; K Kurokawa
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Authors:  M Bullinger; J Alonso; G Apolone; A Leplège; M Sullivan; S Wood-Dauphinee; B Gandek; A Wagner; N Aaronson; P Bech; S Fukuhara; S Kaasa; J E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.

Authors:  P S Myles; B Weitkamp; K Jones; J Melick; S Hensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Kate Leslie; Sally Troedel; Kimberley Irwin; Frances Pearce; Antony Ugoni; Robyn Gillies; Elizabeth Pemberton; Shyamali Dharmage
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.

Authors:  Xue-Shan Bu; Jing Zhang; Yun-Xia Zuo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Introduction of ERAS(®) program into clinical practice: from preoperative management to postoperative evaluation : Opening remarks.

Authors:  Yutaka Oda; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study.

Authors:  Yusuke Naito; Yuu Tanaka; Noriyuki Sasaoka; Toshio Iwata; Yuko Fujimoto; Nozomi Okamoto; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Use of quality of recovery score (QoR40) in the assessment of postoperative recovery and evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

Authors:  Yuu Tanaka; Atushi Yoshimura; Kyoko Tagawa; Dai Shida; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of recovery after abdominal surgery: a hypothesized conceptual framework.

Authors:  Roshni Alam; Sabrina M Figueiredo; Saba Balvardi; Bénédicte Nauche; Tara Landry; Lawrence Lee; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Effect of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate or Oral Rehydration Solution on Postoperative Quality of Recovery: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ayako Asakura; Takahiro Mihara; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Monadi Hamidfar; Douglas M Lawson; Bengt Fridlund; Paul Stewart Myles; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-20

8.  The postoperative patient-reported quality of recovery in colorectal cancer patients under enhanced recovery after surgery using QoR-40.

Authors:  Dai Shida; Kotaro Wakamatsu; Yuu Tanaka; Atsushi Yoshimura; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Sachio Miyamoto; Kyoko Tagawa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.

Authors:  Serkan Karaman; Semih Arici; Serkan Dogru; Tugba Karaman; Hakan Tapar; Ziya Kaya; Mustafa Suren; Mehtap Gurler Balta
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Evaluation of the Swedish Web-Version of Quality of Recovery (SwQoR): Secondary Step in the Development of a Mobile Phone App to Measure Postoperative Recovery.

Authors:  Karuna Dahlberg; Maria Jaensson; Mats Eriksson; Ulrica Nilsson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.