Literature DB >> 9539594

Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery.

B A Swan1, G Maislin, K B Traber.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study, we describe changes in symptom distress and functional status 24 h, 4 days, and 7 days after ambulatory surgery. Adult patients aged 18-64 yr, ASA physical status I-III, were studied. The General Symptom Distress Scale was used to score 11 general symptoms; scores range from 0 (no symptoms present) to 4 (symptoms present, constant, cannot be ignored, and, in a 24-h period, remained distressing for more than half the time). The Functional Status Questionnaire was used to evaluate basic and intermediate activities of daily living. Procedure-specific analyses of covariance were performed using multiple linear regression analyses. These models were used to obtain estimates of change while adjusting for preoperative index values of age, ASA physical status, type of anesthesia, and study site. Models for hernia (n = 41) and laparoscopy (n = 59) procedures used F statistics to test the overall significance of the model. Symptom distress persisted until the 7th postoperative day after ambulatory surgery. Patients experienced decreased functional status during the first 7 postoperative days, especially after hernia repair. Older laparoscopy patients tended to have more symptom distress and decreased functional status than younger patients. Only 22% of patients had returned to full- or part-time work by the 7th postoperative day. We conclude that although major morbidity is uncommon after ambulatory surgery, symptom distress and reduced functional status are common 7 days postoperatively. IMPLICATIONS: Previous studies of patient status after ambulatory surgery have focused on mortality, major morbidity, and unanticipated hospitalization. In this study, we examined clinically significant but less life-threatening patient outcomes. Important problems in ambulatory surgery are posed by complications that occur at home. Careful assessment of discharge criteria is important to avoid these problems in this growing patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539594     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  Local anesthetic hernia repair: gold standard for one and all.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study.

Authors:  Yusuke Naito; Yuu Tanaka; Noriyuki Sasaoka; Toshio Iwata; Yuko Fujimoto; Nozomi Okamoto; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Burden incurred by patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Asha Manohar; Kristin Cheung; Christopher L Wu; Tracey S Stierer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hospital-based, acute care after ambulatory surgery center discharge.

Authors:  Justin P Fox; Anita A Vashi; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Functional status predicts major complications and death after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Donald G Harris; Ilynn Bulatao; Connor P Oates; Richa Kalsi; Charles B Drucker; Nandakumar Menon; Tanya R Flohr; Robert S Crawford
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Monadi Hamidfar; Douglas M Lawson; Bengt Fridlund; Paul Stewart Myles; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-20

7.  Fast-track cardiac anaesthesia protocols: Is quality pushed to the edge?

Authors:  Rajesh Bhavsar; Pia K Ryhammer; Jacob Greisen; Carl-Johan Jakobsen
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

8.  Health-related quality of life following ambulatory surgery procedures: assessment by RAND-36.

Authors:  Kristiina Mattila; Merja Lahtela; Markku Hynynen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Minjong Ki; Seungseo Choi; Cheol Jong Woo; Deokkyu Kim; Hyungsun Lim; Dong-Chan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-10-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.