Literature DB >> 25381076

Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial.

Beverly B Green1, Melissa L Anderson2, Ching-Yun Wang2, Sally W Vernon2, Jessica Chubak2, Richard T Meenan2, Sharon Fuller2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test is necessary for screening to be effective. We hypothesized that nurse navigation would increase the completion of colonoscopy after a positive screening test.
METHODS: This study was conducted between 2008 and 2012 at 21 primary care medical centers in western Washington State. Participants in the Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening study who had a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy needing follow-up were randomized to usual care (UC) or a nurse navigator (navigation). UC included an electronic health record-based positive FOBT registry and physician reminder system. Navigation included UC plus care coordination and patient self-management support from a registered nurse who tracked and assisted patients until they completed or refused colonoscopy. The primary outcome was completion of colonoscopy within 6 months. After 6 months, both groups received navigation.
RESULTS: We randomized 147 participants with a positive FOBT or sigmoidoscopy. Completion of colonoscopy was higher in the intervention group at 6 months, but differences were not statistically significant (91.0% in navigation group vs 80.8% in UC group; adjusted difference, 10.1%; P = .10). Reasons for no or late colonoscopies included refusal, failure to schedule or missed appointments, concerns about risks or costs, and competing health concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Navigation did not lead to a statistically significant incremental benefit at 6 months. IMPACT: Follow-up rates after a positive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test are high in a health care system where UC included a registry and physician reminders. Because of high follow-up rates in a health care system where UC included a registry and physician reminders, and small sample size, we cannot rule out incremental benefits of nurse navigation. © Copyright 2014 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Screening; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Cancer; Patient Navigators

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381076      PMCID: PMC4278960          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  24 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Evelyn P Whitlock; Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth Liles; Tracy L Beil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.

Authors:  R E Myers; B Turner; D Weinberg; W W Hauck; T Hyslop; T Brigham; T Rothermel; J Grana; N Schlackman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening result.

Authors:  Nadeem Baig; Ronald E Myers; Barbara J Turner; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Improving the follow-up of positive hemoccult screening tests: an electronic intervention.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Jackilen Shannon; Melissa R Partin; Jean O'Malley; Zunqiu Chen; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population.

Authors:  Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  The Ohio Patient Navigation Research Program: does the American Cancer Society patient navigation model improve time to resolution in patients with abnormal screening tests?

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Mira L Katz; Douglas M Post; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Eric E Seiber; J Phil Harrop; Cecilia R DeGraffinreid; Cathy M Tatum; Julie A Dean; David M Murray
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Barbara Turner; David Weinberg; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; Timothy Brigham; Todd Rothermel; James Grana; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; Paul E Ronksley; Robert J Hilsden; Braden J Manns; Alaa Rostom; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  25 in total

1.  Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ajeesh Sunny; Luis Rustveld
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Samir Gupta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Chul Ahn; Noel O Santini; Deepak Agrawal; Christian A Mayorga; Caitlin Murphy; Jasmin A Tiro; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Adam C Loewen; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Increasing colonoscopy screening in disparate populations: Results from an evaluation of patient navigation in the New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard; Amy DeGroff; Joanne Gersten; Janene Robie; Steven Leadbetter; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Lynn Butterly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Jane J Kim; Elisabeth F Beaber; Yingye Zheng; Andrea Burnett-Hartman; Jessica Chubak; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale McLerran; Nancy Breen; Emily F Conant; Berta M Geller; Beverly B Green; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Inrig; Celette Sugg Skinner; Virginia P Quinn; Jennifer S Haas; Mitchell Schnall; Carolyn M Rutter; William E Barlow; Douglas A Corley; Katrina Armstrong; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Michael P Garcia; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Yingye Zheng; Douglas A Corley; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal; Carrie N Klabunde; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Joanne E Schottinger; Beverly B Green; Virginia P Quinn; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Primary Care Setting in Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Kursat Sahin; Servet Aker; Hatice Nilden Arslan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-02

9.  Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type.

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Celette Sugg Skinner; Yingye Zheng; Stephen Inrig; Douglas A Corley; Elisabeth F Beaber; Mike Garcia; Jessica Chubak; Chyke Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Jennifer S Haas; Christopher I Li; Karen J Wernli; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Rachel B Issaka; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.