Literature DB >> 19523536

Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Steven J Heitman1, Paul E Ronksley, Robert J Hilsden, Braden J Manns, Alaa Rostom, Brenda R Hemmelgarn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is an extensive yet inconsistent body of literature reporting on the prevalence of adenomatous polyps (adenomas) and colorectal cancer among average risk individuals. The objectives of our study were to determine the pooled prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer, as well as nonadvanced and advanced adenomas, among average risk North Americans.
METHODS: Articles were obtained by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE: 1950 through March 2008 and EMBASE: 1980 through March 2008), bibliographies, major journals, and conference proceedings, with no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected cross-sectional studies reporting adenoma and colorectal cancer prevalence rates in average risk individuals and assessed studies for inclusion and quality, and extracted the data for analysis. Pooled adenoma and colorectal cancer prevalence rates were estimated using fixed and random effects models. Stratification and metaregression was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Based on 18 included studies, the pooled prevalence of adenomas, colorectal cancer, nonadvanced adenomas, and advanced adenomas was 30.2%, 0.3%, 17.7%, and 5.7%, respectively. Heterogeneity was observed in the pooled prevalence rates for overall adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancer and was explained by the mean age (> or = 65 years vs < 65 years) with older cohorts reporting higher prevalence rates. None of the study quality indicators was found to be significant predictors of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer, especially among older screen-eligible individuals, provides impetus for expanding colorectal cancer screening programs. Furthermore, the pooled prevalence estimates can be used as quality indicators for established programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523536     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  95 in total

1.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Pitfalls of using administrative data for research.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A giant rectal villous adenoma with a malicious intent.

Authors:  Maen Aboul Hosn; Nafisa Abdel-Hafiez; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Abir Al-Ahmadie; Ahmad Antar; Haifaa Dbouk; Hassan El Farran; Mahmoud El-Sawy Mohamed; Khaled Rida; Deborah Mukherji; Eileen M O'Reilly; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09

4.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Different risk factors for advanced colorectal neoplasm in young adults.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Dong Il Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Low rate of large polyps (>9 mm) within 10 years after an adequate baseline colonoscopy with no polyps.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia D Morris; Judith Logan; J Lucas Williams; Patricia Carney
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

8.  Vegetarianism as a protective factor for colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma in Asians.

Authors:  Chang Geun Lee; Suk Jae Hahn; Min Keun Song; Jun Kyu Lee; Jae Hak Kim; Yun Jeong Lim; Moon-Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee; Hyoun Woo Kang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.

Authors:  Aditya Sai; Carolina Vivas-Valencia; Thomas F Imperiale; Nan Kong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Molecular markers of carcinogenesis for risk stratification of individuals with colorectal polyps: a case-control study.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Han Sun; Sang Yi; Joy Storm; Guanghua Xiao; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Song Zhang; Raheela Ashfaq; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.