Literature DB >> 23045537

Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population.

Peter C Raich1, Elizabeth M Whitley, William Thorland, Patricia Valverde, Diane Fairclough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barriers to timely resolution of abnormal cancer screening tests add to cancer health disparities among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of lay patient navigators on time to resolution and completion of follow-up testing among patients with abnormal screening tests in a medically underserved patient population.
METHODS: Denver Health, the safety-net health care system serving Denver, is one of 10 performance sites participating in the Patient Navigation Research Program. Of 993 eligible subjects with abnormal screening tests randomized to navigation and no-navigation (control) arms and analyzed, 628 had abnormal breast screens (66 abnormal clinical breast examinations, 304 BIRADS 0, 200 BIRADS 3, 58 BIRADS 4 or 5) whereas 235 had abnormal colorectal and 130 had abnormal prostate screens.
RESULTS: Time to resolution was significantly shorter in the navigated group (stratified log rank test, P < 0.001). Patient navigation improved diagnostic resolution for patients presenting with mammographic BIRADS 3 (P = 0.0003) and BIRADS 0 (P = 0.09), but not BIRADS 4/5 or abnormal breast examinations. Navigation shortened the time for both colorectal (P = 0.0017) and prostate screening resolution (P = 0.06). Participant demographics included 72% minority, 49% with annual household income less than $10,000, and 36% uninsured.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation positively impacts time to resolution of abnormal screening tests for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers in a medically underserved population. IMPACT: By shortening the time to and increasing the proportion of patients with diagnostic resolution patient navigation could reduce disparities in stage at diagnosis and improve cancer outcomes. 2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23045537      PMCID: PMC4053249          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

Review 1.  Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Jennifer M Croswell; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina; Rongwei Fu; Ken Gleitsmann; Helen C Koenig; Clarence Lam; Ashley Maltz; J Bruin Rugge; Kenneth Lin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Stephen J McPhee; Ginny Gildengorin; Thoa Nguyen; Ching Wong; Ky Q Lai; Hy Lam; Jeremiah Mock; Thien-Nhien Luong; Ngoc Bui-Tong; Tuyet Ha-Iaconis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Yahaira Gutierrez; Jaime Lopez; Jennifer Christie; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathleen Ell; Betsy Vourlekis; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Bin Xie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Electra Paskett; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Ping-Hsin Chen; Steve Kim
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Richard W Grant; Alexander R Green; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Gloria Gamba; Sarah Oo; James M Richter; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities.

Authors:  Jennifer Christie; Steven Itzkowitz; Irene Lihau-Nkanza; Anabella Castillo; William Redd; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.798

View more
  77 in total

1.  The impact of patient navigation on the delivery of diagnostic breast cancer care in the National Patient Navigation Research Program: a prospective meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; Julie S Darnell; Naomi Ko; Fred Snyder; Electra D Paskett; Kristen J Wells; Elizabeth M Whitley; Jennifer J Griggs; Anand Karnad; Heather Young; Victoria Warren-Mears; Melissa A Simon; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Barriers to health care contribute to delays in follow-up among women with abnormal cancer screening: Data from the Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Ambili Ramachandran; Frederick R Snyder; Mira L Katz; Julie S Darnell; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Mechelle R Sanders; Patricia A Valverde; Melissa A Simon; Victoria Warren-Mears; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Gregory S Young; Paul L Reiter; Tracy A Battaglia; Kristen J Wells; Mechelle Sanders; Melissa Simon; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

4.  Adherence in the Cancer Care Setting: a Systematic Review of Patient Navigation to Traverse Barriers.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Michael R Kaufman; Taylor Shackleford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: the Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Julie S Darnell; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Martha L Hare; Nancy LaVerda; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul Levine; David M Murray; Steven R Patierno; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim; Melissa Simon; Frederick R Snyder; Victoria Warren-Mears; Elizabeth M Whitley; Paul Winters; Gregory S Young; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  "BeneFITs" to increase colorectal cancer screening in priority populations.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  A Comparison of Different Intensities of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Mammography.

Authors:  Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Yamile Molina; Sage Kim; Richard T Campbell; Julie Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2018-06-15

8.  Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Stephen J Inrig; Caroline Mejias; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study design: A trial with implications for efficacy, effect modification, and full continuum assessment.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Anne E Glassgow; Sage J Kim; Nerida M Berrios; Heather Pauls; Karriem S Watson; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Predictors of resolution in navigated patients with abnormal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Gregory S Young; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Community Support Oncol       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.