Literature DB >> 27914403

Acoustic attenuation imaging of tissue bulk properties with a priori information.

Fong Ming Hooi1, Oliver Kripfgans1, Paul L Carson1.   

Abstract

Attenuation of ultrasound waves traversing a medium is not only a result of absorption and scattering within a given tissue, but also of coherent scattering, including diffraction, refraction, and reflection of the acoustic wave at tissue boundaries. This leads to edge enhancement and other artifacts in most reconstruction algorithms, other than 3D wave migration with currently impractical, implementations. The presented approach accounts for energy loss at tissue boundaries by normalizing data based on variable sound speed, and potential density, of the medium using a k-space wave solver. Coupled with a priori knowledge of major sound speed distributions, physical attenuation values within broad ranges, and the assumption of homogeneity within segmented regions, an attenuation image representative of region bulk properties is constructed by solving a penalized weighted least squares optimization problem. This is in contradistinction to absorption or to conventional attenuation coefficient based on overall insertion loss with strong dependence on sound speed and impedance mismatches at tissue boundaries. This imaged property will be referred to as the bulk attenuation coefficient. The algorithm is demonstrated on an opposed array setup, with mean-squared-error improvements from 0.6269 to 0.0424 (dB/cm/MHz)2 for a cylindrical phantom, and 0.1622 to 0.0256 (dB/cm/MHz)2 for a windowed phantom.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914403      PMCID: PMC5114017          DOI: 10.1121/1.4962983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Large domain, low-contrast acoustic inverse scattering for ultrasound breast imaging.

Authors:  Mark Haynes; Mahta Moghaddam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array.

Authors:  Sheng-Wen Huang; Pai-Chi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Ultrasonic attenuation in human tissue.

Authors:  R C Chivers; C R Hill
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound.

Authors:  Sumedha P Sinha; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Alexis V Nees; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Gerald L LeCarpentier; J Brian Fowlkes; Carl L Chalek; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; R A Belgam; P L Carson; C R Meyer; J V Sutherland; F L Bookstein; T M Silver
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  First-arrival traveltime sound speed inversion with a priori information.

Authors:  Fong Ming Hooi; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Signal processing of broadband pulsed ultrasound: measurement of attenuation of soft biological tissues.

Authors:  A C Kak; K A Dines
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Measurement of spatial distribution of refractive index in tissues by ultrasonic computer assisted tomography.

Authors:  J F Greenleaf; S A Johnson; A H Lent
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  The value of ultrasonic examination to detect and diagnose breast carcinomas. Analysis of the results obtained in 125 tumors using radiographic and ultrasound mammography.

Authors:  D Rotten; J M Levaillant
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acoustic beam anomalies in automated breast imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Jintamethasawat; Xiaohui Zhang; Paul L Carson; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.