Literature DB >> 9114677

Single stitch laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

W T Siu1, H T Leong, M K Li.   

Abstract

The standard treatment for perforated peptic ulcers in most institutions is omental patch repair and lavage. A laparoscopic approach is attractive because of the simplicity of the procedure. Most of the previously described laparoscopic methods required multiple working ports and multiple stitches. We employed three operating ports and applied a single stitch to close small peptic ulcer perforations. Prospective evaluations of the initial 33 cases of laparoscopic patch repair have confirmed its safety. There were five conversions, two for large perforations (> 10 mm), two for perforated gastric ulcers and the remaining one was converted because of bleeding. One patient early in the series with a 10-mm perforation suffered from radiological leakage after repair, which required secondary intervention. The mean operating time was 50 min. Patients, on average, require one dose of intramuscular pethidine (1 mg/kg body weight) for pain relief. The mean hospital stay was 6 days and 97% of them returned to their daily activities within 10 days of the operation. There was no mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9114677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb        ISSN: 0035-8835


  13 in total

1.  Routine laparoscopic single-stitch omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer: experience from 338 cases.

Authors:  D C T Wong; W T Siu; S K H Wong; Y P Tai; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Bassi; Nazareno Smerieri; Michele Masetti; Francesco Ferrara; Carlo Fabbri; Luca Ansaloni; Stefania Ghersi; Matteo Serenari; Federico Coccolini; Noel Naidoo; Massimo Sartelli; Gregorio Tugnoli; Fausto Catena; Vincenzo Cennamo; Elio Jovine
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Management of perforated peptic ulcer in a district general hospital.

Authors:  A C Critchley; A W Phillips; S M Bawa; P V Gallagher
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Lo; Shih-Chi Wu; Hung-Chang Huang; Chun-Chieh Yeh; Jui-Chien Huang; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The selective use of laparoscopic repair is safe in high-risk patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Amy Siu Yan Kok; Simon Kin Hung Wong; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by running suture.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Peter Böttinger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  Sandhya Lagoo; Ross L McMahon; Minoru Kakihara; Theodore N Pappas; Steve Eubanks
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.