Literature DB >> 25370622

Respiratory motion management using audio-visual biofeedback for respiratory-gated radiotherapy of synchrotron-based pulsed heavy-ion beam delivery.

Pengbo He1, Qiang Li2, Xinguo Liu2, Zhongying Dai2, Ting Zhao2, Tingyan Fu2, Guosheng Shen2, Yuanyuan Ma1, Qiyan Huang1, Yuanlin Yan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To efficiently deliver respiratory-gated radiation during synchrotron-based pulsed heavy-ion radiotherapy, a novel respiratory guidance method combining a personalized audio-visual biofeedback (BFB) system, breath hold (BH), and synchrotron-based gating was designed to help patients synchronize their respiratory patterns with synchrotron pulses and to overcome typical limitations such as low efficiency, residual motion, and discomfort.
METHODS: In-house software was developed to acquire body surface marker positions and display BFB, gating signals, and real-time beam profiles on a LED screen. Patients were prompted to perform short BHs or short deep breath holds (SDBH) with the aid of BFB following a personalized standard BH/SDBH (stBH/stSDBH) guiding curve or their own representative BH/SDBH (reBH/reSDBH) guiding curve. A practical simulation was performed for a group of 15 volunteers to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this method. Effective dose rates (EDRs), mean absolute errors between the guiding curves and the measured curves, and mean absolute deviations of the measured curves were obtained within 10%-50% duty cycles (DCs) that were synchronized with the synchrotron's flat-top phase.
RESULTS: All maneuvers for an individual volunteer took approximately half an hour, and no one experienced discomfort during the maneuvers. Using the respiratory guidance methods, the magnitude of residual motion was almost ten times less than during nongated irradiation, and increases in the average effective dose rate by factors of 2.39-4.65, 2.39-4.59, 1.73-3.50, and 1.73-3.55 for the stBH, reBH, stSDBH, and reSDBH guiding maneuvers, respectively, were observed in contrast with conventional free breathing-based gated irradiation, depending on the respiratory-gated duty cycle settings.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed respiratory guidance method with personalized BFB was confirmed to be feasible in a group of volunteers. Increased effective dose rate and improved overall treatment precision were observed compared to conventional free breathing-based, respiratory-gated irradiation. Because breathing guidance curves could be established based on the respective average respiratory period and amplitude for each patient, it may be easier for patients to cooperate using this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25370622      PMCID: PMC4218689          DOI: 10.1118/1.4897391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  Issues in respiratory motion compensation during external-beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Cihat Ozhasoglu; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Effects of respiratory motion on dose uniformity with a charged particle scanning method.

Authors:  M H Phillips; E Pedroni; H Blattmann; T Boehringer; A Coray; S Scheib
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Quasi-breath-hold technique using personalized audio-visual biofeedback for respiratory motion management in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Park; Siyong Kim; Hwiyoung Kim; Il Han Kim; Kunwoo Lee; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Respiratory gated irradiation system for heavy-ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Minohara; T Kanai; M Endo; K Noda; M Kanazawa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Clinical experience using respiratory gated radiation therapy: comparison of free-breathing and breath-hold techniques.

Authors:  Anthony M Berson; Richard Emery; Lara Rodriguez; Gregory M Richards; Tracy Ng; Seema Sanghavi; Jean Barsa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Quantifying the predictability of diaphragm motion during respiration with a noninvasive external marker.

Authors:  S S Vedam; V R Kini; P J Keall; V Ramakrishnan; H Mostafavi; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Patient training in respiratory-gated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Vijay R Kini; Subrahmanya S Vedam; Paul J Keall; Sumukh Patil; Clayton Chen; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Measurement of lung tumor motion using respiration-correlated CT.

Authors:  Gig S Mageras; Alex Pevsner; Ellen D Yorke; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Eric C Ford; Agung Hertanto; Steven M Larson; D Michael Lovelock; Yusuf E Erdi; Sadek A Nehmeh; John L Humm; C Clifton Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Correlation between the respiratory waveform measured using a respiratory sensor and 3D tumor motion in gated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Tsunashima; Takeji Sakae; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Kenji Kagei; Toshiyuki Terunuma; Akihiro Nohtomi; Yasuyuki Akine
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Irradiation synchronized with respiration gate.

Authors:  K Ohara; T Okumura; M Akisada; T Inada; T Mori; H Yokota; M J Calaguas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison between audio-only and audiovisual biofeedback for regulating patients' respiration during four-dimensional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jesang Yu; Ji Hoon Choi; Sun Young Ma; Tae Sig Jeung; Sangwook Lim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Impact of Different Synchrotron Flattop Operation Modes on 4D Dosimetric Uncertainties for Scanned Carbon-Ion Beam Delivery.

Authors:  Pengbo He; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Flourish of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in China.

Authors:  Yue Li; Xiaoman Li; Jiancheng Yang; Sicheng Wang; Meitang Tang; Jiawen Xia; Yunzhe Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.