BACKGROUND: Over the course of the thrombectomy procedure, clot fragments may become dislodged and lead to downstream emboli due to manipulation of an endovascular device. The EmboTrap thrombectomy system features an inner stent channel with an outer stent trap design that may potentially reduce the risk of distal clot fragmentation during clot removal. We tested the hypothesis that distal emboli to both the same and new territory generated during mechanical thrombectomy are a function of device design. METHODS: EmboTrap and Solitaire thrombectomy were conducted in an in vitro model system that mimicked a middle-cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion within a complete circle of Willis vascular replica and a contrast-enhanced clot analog. Emboli generated during the procedure with a size >1,000 μm were collected and measured with calipers. The Coulter principle was used to characterize emboli with a size between 200 and 1,000 µm. RESULTS: EmboTrap thrombectomy resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of large emboli (>1,000 μm) formation as compared to first-generation stent retriever thrombectomy (p = 0.031, Fisher exact test). The majority of emboli >1,000 μm (∼80%) were found in the MCA, regardless of device type. There was no significant difference between the EmboTrap and Solitaire in 200 to 1,000 μm emboli formation (p = 0.89, Mann-Whitney test). When combining all emboli in the most dangerous range (>200 μm), EmboTrap offered a size reduction of emboli (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The risk of distal embolization can be altered with improved stent retriever design. When encountering fragment-prone clots, EmboTrap thrombectomy may lower the risk of distal embolization.
BACKGROUND: Over the course of the thrombectomy procedure, clot fragments may become dislodged and lead to downstream emboli due to manipulation of an endovascular device. The EmboTrap thrombectomy system features an inner stent channel with an outer stent trap design that may potentially reduce the risk of distal clot fragmentation during clot removal. We tested the hypothesis that distal emboli to both the same and new territory generated during mechanical thrombectomy are a function of device design. METHODS: EmboTrap and Solitaire thrombectomy were conducted in an in vitro model system that mimicked a middle-cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion within a complete circle of Willis vascular replica and a contrast-enhanced clot analog. Emboli generated during the procedure with a size >1,000 μm were collected and measured with calipers. The Coulter principle was used to characterize emboli with a size between 200 and 1,000 µm. RESULTS: EmboTrap thrombectomy resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of large emboli (>1,000 μm) formation as compared to first-generation stent retriever thrombectomy (p = 0.031, Fisher exact test). The majority of emboli >1,000 μm (∼80%) were found in the MCA, regardless of device type. There was no significant difference between the EmboTrap and Solitaire in 200 to 1,000 μm emboli formation (p = 0.89, Mann-Whitney test). When combining all emboli in the most dangerous range (>200 μm), EmboTrap offered a size reduction of emboli (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The risk of distal embolization can be altered with improved stent retriever design. When encountering fragment-prone clots, EmboTrap thrombectomy may lower the risk of distal embolization.
Authors: C Kabbasch; A Mpotsaris; T Liebig; M Söderman; M Holtmannspötter; M Cronqvist; J Thornton; V Mendes Pereira; T Andersson Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arturo Renú; Carlos Laredo; Antonio Lopez-Rueda; Laura Llull; Raúl Tudela; Luis San-Roman; Xabier Urra; Jordi Blasco; Juan Macho; Laura Oleaga; Angel Chamorro; Sergio Amaro Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Miklos G Marosfoi; Netanel Korin; Matthew J Gounis; Oktay Uzun; Srinivasan Vedantham; Erin T Langan; Anne-Laure Papa; Olivia W Brooks; Chris Johnson; Ajit S Puri; Deen Bhatta; Mathumai Kanapathipillai; Ben R Bronstein; Ju-Yu Chueh; Donald E Ingber; Ajay K Wakhloo Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Pascal P Gratz; Simon Jung; Gerhard Schroth; Jan Gralla; Pasquale Mordasini; Kety Hsieh; Mirjam R Heldner; Heinrich P Mattle; Marie-Luise Mono; Urs Fischer; Marcel Arnold; Christoph Zubler Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Senna Staessens; Olivier François; Waleed Brinjikji; Karen M Doyle; Peter Vanacker; Tommy Andersson; Simon F De Meyer Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A Srivatsan; V M Srinivasan; R M Starke; E C Peterson; D R Yavagal; A E Hassan; A Alawieh; A M Spiotta; Y Saleem; K M Fargen; S Q Wolfe; R A de Leacy; I P Singh; I L Maier; J N Johnson; J-K Burkhardt; S R Chen; P Kan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Adnan H Siddiqui; Raul G Nogueira; Muhammad Waqas; Waleed Brinjikji; Simon F De Meyer; Karen Doyle; Jens Fiehler; Werner Hacke; Ricardo A Hanel; Tudor G Jovin; David S Liebeskind; Albert J Yoo; Osama O Zaidat; Tommy Andersson Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 8.572