Literature DB >> 25365573

Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.

Weiwei Zhang1, Steven J Luck1.   

Abstract

According to the load theory of attention, an increased perceptual load reduces distractor processing whereas an increased working memory load facilitates distractor processing. Here we raise the possibility that the critical distinction may instead be between an emphasis on resolution and an emphasis on capacity. That is, perceptual load manipulations typically emphasize resolution (fine-grained discriminations), whereas working memory load manipulations typically emphasize capacity (simultaneous processing of multiple relevant stimuli). To test the plausibility of this hypothesis, we used a visual working memory task that emphasized either the number of items to be stored (capacity load, retaining 2 vs. 4 colors) or the precision of the representations (resolution load, detecting small vs. large color changes). We found that an increased capacity load led to increased flanker interference (a measure of distractor processing), whereas an increased resolution load led to reduced flanker interference. These opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing mirror the previously described opposite effects of perceptual load and working memory load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365573      PMCID: PMC4308516          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection.

Authors:  T C Handy; M Soltani; G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

2.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load.

Authors:  Do-Joon Yi; Geoffrey F Woodman; David Widders; René Marois; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

4.  Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

Authors:  G F Woodman; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

5.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Ula Cartwright-Finch; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-02-14

6.  Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.

Authors:  Lubna Ahmed; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.

Authors:  N Lavie; Y Tsal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

9.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

10.  Load induced blindness.

Authors:  James S P Macdonald; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Composite Face Effect Predicts Configural Encoding in Visual Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Lilian Azer; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-11

3.  Concurrent working memory task increases or decreases the flanker-related N2 amplitude.

Authors:  Hua Wei; Yuan Yao; Lili Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.