Literature DB >> 22872549

Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.

Lubna Ahmed1, Jan W de Fockert.   

Abstract

Selective attention to relevant targets has been shown to depend on the availability of working memory (WM). Under conditions of high WM load, processing of irrelevant distractors is enhanced. Here we showed that this detrimental effect of WM load on selective attention efficiency is reversed when the task requires global- rather than local-level processing. Participants were asked to attend to either the local or the global level of a hierarchical Navon stimulus while keeping either a low or a high load in WM. In line with previous findings, during attention to the local level, distractors at the global level produced more interference under high than under low WM load. By contrast, loading WM had the opposite effect of improving selective attention during attention to the global level. The findings demonstrate that the impact of WM load on selective attention is not invariant, but rather is dependent on the level of the to-be-attended information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872549     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Synchrony effect on joint attention.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural effects of cognitive control load on auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Merav Sabri; Colin Humphries; Matthew Verber; Einat Liebenthal; Jeffrey R Binder; Jain Mangalathu; Anjali Desai
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

6.  Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Andreas Schmitt; Wouter Braet; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

7.  Working Memory Load Enhances the Attentional Capture of Low Reward History.

Authors:  Yujie Wu; Tingni Li; Zhe Qu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.