Literature DB >> 25362549

Innovative testing of spatial ability: interactive responding and the use of complex stimuli material.

Martin Jelínek1, Petr Květon, Dalibor Vobořil.   

Abstract

Despite initial expectations, which have emerged with the advancement of computer technology over the last decade of the twentieth century, scientific literature does not contain many relevant references regarding the development and use of innovative items in psychological testing. Our study presents and evaluates two novel item types. One item type is derived from a standard schematic test item used for the assessment of the spatial perception aspect of spatial ability, enhanced by an interactive response module. The performance on this item type is correlated with the performance on its paper and pencil counterpart. The other innovative item type used complex stimuli in the form of a short video of a ride through a city presented in an on-route perspective, which is intended to measure navigation skills and the ability to keep oneself oriented in space. In this case, the scores were related to the capacity of visuo-spatial working memory and also to the overall score in the paper/pencil test of spatial ability. The second relationship was moderated by gender.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25362549     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-014-0639-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  9 in total

Review 1.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments.

Authors:  A W Siegel; S H White
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1975

2.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies.

Authors:  David H Uttal; Nathaniel G Meadow; Elizabeth Tipton; Linda L Hand; Alison R Alden; Christopher Warren; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Victor R Schinazi; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The effect of text continuity on spatial representation: route versus survey perspective.

Authors:  Masashi Sugimoto; Takashi Kusumi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-02

6.  The Rod-and-Frame test: some comments on methodology.

Authors:  G Lester
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1968-06

7.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M C Linn; A C Petersen
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1985-12

Review 8.  What determines our navigational abilities?

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  An investigation of the validity of the virtual spatial navigation assessment.

Authors:  Matthew Ventura; Valerie Shute; Tim Wright; Weinan Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.