Literature DB >> 25361864

A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.

Barbara J Juhasz1, Yun-Hsuan Lai2, Michelle L Woodcock2.   

Abstract

Since the work of Taft and Forster (1976), a growing literature has examined how English compound words are recognized and organized in the mental lexicon. Much of this research has focused on whether compound words are decomposed during recognition by manipulating the word frequencies of their lexemes. However, many variables may impact morphological processing, including relational semantic variables such as semantic transparency, as well as additional form-related and semantic variables. In the present study, ratings were collected on 629 English compound words for six variables [familiarity, age of acquisition (AoA), semantic transparency, lexeme meaning dominance (LMD), imageability, and sensory experience ratings (SER)]. All of the compound words selected for this study are contained within the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007), which made it possible to use a regression approach to examine the predictive power of these variables for lexical decision and word naming performance. Analyses indicated that familiarity, AoA, imageability, and SER were all significant predictors of both lexical decision and word naming performance when they were added separately to a model containing the length and frequency of the compounds, as well as the lexeme frequencies. In addition, rated semantic transparency also predicted lexical decision performance. The database of English compound words should be beneficial to word recognition researchers who are interested in selecting items for experiments on compound words, and it will also allow researchers to conduct further analyses using the available data combined with word recognition times included in the English Lexicon Project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age of acquisition; Compound word recognition; Familiarity; Imageability; Morphological processing; Sensory experience ratings

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25361864     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0523-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  14 in total

1.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Julie A Van Dyke; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The Role of Word Properties in Performance on Fluency Tasks in People with Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Adrià Rofes; Vânia de Aguiar; Bronte Ficek; Haley Wendt; Kimberly Webster; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  How does attribute ambiguity improve memory?

Authors:  C J Brainerd; M Chang; D M Bialer; X Liu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-26

5.  Memory effects of semantic attributes: A method of controlling attribute contamination.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; D M Bialer; M Chang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-24

6.  What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer's Disease?

Authors:  Adrià Rofes; Vânia de Aguiar; Roel Jonkers; Se Jin Oh; Gayle DeDe; Jee Eun Sung
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-21

7.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

8.  From Grapheme to Phonological Output: Performance of Adults Who Stutter on a Word Jumble Task.

Authors:  Megann McGill; Harvey Sussman; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Madrid Affective Database for Spanish (MADS): Ratings of Dominance, Familiarity, Subjective Age of Acquisition and Sensory Experience.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Irene Rincón-Pérez; M Verónica Romero-Ferreiro; Natalia Martínez-García; Cristina Villalba-García; Pedro R Montoro; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two words as one: A multi-naming investigation of the age-of-acquisition effect in compound-word processing.

Authors:  Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif; Jon C Catling; Steven Frisson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.