Literature DB >> 36002626

Memory effects of semantic attributes: A method of controlling attribute contamination.

C J Brainerd1, D M Bialer2, M Chang2.   

Abstract

Rating norms for semantic attributes (e.g., concreteness, familiarity, valence) are widely used to study the content that people process as they encode meaningful material. Intensity ratings of individual attributes have been manipulated in numerous experiments with a range of memory paradigms, but those manipulations are contaminated by substantial correlations with the intensity ratings of other attributes. A method of controlling such contamination is needed, which requires a determination of how many distinct attributes there are among the large collection of attributes for which published norms are available. Identification of overlapping words in multiple rating projects yielded a data base containing normed values for each word's perceived intensity (M rating) and ambiguity (rating SD) on 20 different attributes. Principal component analyses then revealed that the intensity space was spanned by just three latent semantic attributes, and the ambiguity space was spanned by five. Psychologically, the big three intensity factors (emotional valence, size, age) were highly interpretable, as were the big five ambiguity factors (discrete emotion, emotional valence, age, meaningfulness, and verbatim memory). We provide a data base of intensity and ambiguity factor scores that can be used to conduct uncontaminated studies of the memory effects of the intensity and ambiguity of latent semantic attributes.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attribute ambiguity; Attribute intensity; Latent semantic structure; Semantic attributes; Semantic word norms

Year:  2022        PMID: 36002626     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01945-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  34 in total

1.  Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition?

Authors:  Hillary Anger Elfenbein; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space.

Authors:  J T Cacioppo; W L Gardner; G G Berntson
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  1997

3.  Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.

Authors:  Michael J Cortese; Maya M Khanna
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

4.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Amy Beth Warriner; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-09

5.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The Emotional-Ambiguity Hypothesis: A Large-Scale Test.

Authors:  C J Brainerd
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-08-21

7.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of word and pseudoword superiority effects in 7- and 11-year-olds.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra; Elyse George
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Ralph Adolphs; Stacy Marsella; Aleix M Martinez; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2019-07

9.  Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Andrew Biemiller
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

10.  Humor norms for 4,997 English words.

Authors:  Tomas Engelthaler; Thomas T Hills
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.