Literature DB >> 25361380

4D image reconstruction for emission tomography.

Andrew J Reader1, Jeroen Verhaeghe.   

Abstract

An overview of the theory of 4D image reconstruction for emission tomography is given along with a review of the current state of the art, covering both positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). By viewing 4D image reconstruction as a matter of either linear or non-linear parameter estimation for a set of spatiotemporal functions chosen to approximately represent the radiotracer distribution, the areas of so-called 'fully 4D' image reconstruction and 'direct kinetic parameter estimation' are unified within a common framework. Many choices of linear and non-linear parameterization of these functions are considered (including the important case where the parameters have direct biological meaning), along with a review of the algorithms which are able to estimate these often non-linear parameters from emission tomography data. The other crucial components to image reconstruction (the objective function, the system model and the raw data format) are also covered, but in less detail due to the relatively straightforward extension from their corresponding components in conventional 3D image reconstruction. The key unifying concept is that maximum likelihood or maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of either linear or non-linear model parameters can be achieved in image space after carrying out a conventional expectation maximization (EM) update of the dynamic image series, using a Kullback-Leibler distance metric (comparing the modeled image values with the EM image values), to optimize the desired parameters. For MAP, an image-space penalty for regularization purposes is required. The benefits of 4D and direct reconstruction reported in the literature are reviewed, and furthermore demonstrated with simple simulation examples. It is clear that the future of reconstructing dynamic or functional emission tomography images, which often exhibit high levels of spatially correlated noise, should ideally exploit these 4D approaches.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361380     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/R371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  Can PET be performed without an attenuation scan?

Authors:  Colin Jones; Ran Klein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Relative Patlak plot for dynamic PET parametric imaging without the need for early-time input function.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Jinyi Qi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.

Authors:  Zhaolin Chen; Sharna D Jamadar; Shenpeng Li; Francesco Sforazzini; Jakub Baran; Nicholas Ferris; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dynamic PET of human liver inflammation: impact of kinetic modeling with optimization-derived dual-blood input function.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Michael T Corwin; Kristin A Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Souvik Sarkar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Direct reconstruction of parametric images for brain PET with event-by-event motion correction: evaluation in two tracers across count levels.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Jean-Dominque Gallezot; Jianhua Yan; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Cardiac-gated parametric images from 82 Rb PET from dynamic frames and direct 4D reconstruction.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Concurrent Respiratory Motion Correction of Abdominal PET and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI Using a Compressed Sensing Approach.

Authors:  Niccolo Fuin; Onofrio A Catalano; Michele Scipioni; Lisanne P W Canjels; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Stefano Pedemonte; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.

Authors:  Yoann Petibon; Yothin Rakvongthai; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.