| Literature DB >> 25360680 |
Muhammad Arslan1, Muhammad Afzal2, Imran Amin3, Samina Iqbal2, Qaiser M Khan2.
Abstract
Plant-bacteria partnership is a promising strategy for the remediation of soil and water polluted with hydrocarbons. However, the limitation of major nutrients (N, P and K) in soil affects the survival and metabolic activity of plant associated bacteria. The objective of this study was to explore the effects of nutrients on survival and metabolic activity of an alkane degrading rhizo-bacterium. Annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) was grown in diesel-contaminated soil and inoculated with an alkane degrading bacterium, Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79, in greenhouse experiments. Two levels of nutrients were applied and plant growth, hydrocarbon removal, and gene abundance and expression were determined after 100 days of sowing of ryegrass. Results obtained from these experiments showed that the bacterial inoculation improved plant growth and hydrocarbon degradation and these were further enhanced by nutrients application. Maximum plant biomass production and hydrocarbon mineralization was observed by the combined use of inoculum and higher level of nutrients. The presence of nutrients in soil enhanced the colonization and metabolic activity of the inoculated bacterium in the rhizosphere. The abundance and expression of CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass was found to be directly associated with the level of applied nutrients. Enhanced hydrocarbon degradation was associated with the population of the inoculum bacterium, the abundance and expression of CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass. It is thus concluded that the combination between vegetation, inoculation with pollutant-degrading bacteria and nutrients amendment was an efficient approach to reduce hydrocarbon contamination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25360680 PMCID: PMC4215983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effect of bacterial inoculation and nutrients on shoot length (SL), shoot and root fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) of ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil after 100 days of sowing.
| Treatment | SL (cm) | Shoot weight | Root weight | ||
| FW (g) | DW (g) | FW (g) | DW (g) | ||
| Control (− diesel) | 27.6a (1.6) | 38.5a (0.8) | 8.5a (0.4) | 9.3a (0.4) | 3.94a (0.03) |
|
| 29.1a (1.3) | 39.1a (2.1) | 8.8a (0.2) | 9.8a (1.0) | 4.15a (0.04) |
| Control (+ Diesel) | 7.9d (0.6) | 4.6e (0.6) | 1.7d (0.1) | 5.3d (0.5) | 1.45d (0.03) |
|
| 15.1c (1.7) | 8.6d (0.7) | 2.2d (0.1) | 6.4c (0.1) | 2.90c (0.08) |
|
| 17.6c (1.3) | 10.9c (0.4) | 3.1c (0.1) | 7.6b (0.4) | 3.13c (0.08) |
|
| 21.7b (1.6) | 15.5b (1.1) | 4.2b (0.5) | 8.4b (0.5) | 3.61b (0.04) |
Each value is the mean of three replicates, means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a 5% level of significance, and the standard error of three replicates is presented in parentheses.
Effect of bacterial inoculation and nutrients on average shoot diameter and shoot network length of ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil after 100 days of sowing.
| Treatments | Average shoot diameter (mm) | Shoot network length (cm) |
| Control (− diesel) | 3.2a | 112.8a |
|
| 3.3a | 123.6a |
| Control (+ Diesel) | 1.3d | 32.4d |
|
| 1.8cd | 65.6c |
|
| 2.1bc | 83.1b |
|
| 2.4b | 96.4b |
Each value is the mean of three replicates, means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a 5% level of significance, and the standard error of three replicates is presented in parentheses.
Figure 1Experimental setup illustrating different treatments.
Ryegrass vegetated in uncontaminated soil (A), ryegrass vegetated in uncontaminated soil and inoculated with Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 (B), inoculation of Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 in diesel contaminated soil (C), ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil (D), ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil and inoculated with Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 (E), ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil treated with lower level of fertilize and inoculated with Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 (F), and ryegrass vegetated in diesel contaminated soil treated with higher level of fertilizer and inoculated with Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 (G).
Effect of nutrients on CFU, abundance and expression of Pantoea sp. strain BTRH79 in the rhizosphere of ryegrass.
| Treatment | CFU g−1 soil ×104 | Gene abundance (copies g−1 dry soil) ×104 | Gene expression (copies g−1 dry soil) ×104 |
|
| 0.62 (0.23)d | 0.42d (0.18) | 0.16d (0.11) |
|
| 0.73 (0.25)d | 0.24d (0.14) | 0.07d (0.02) |
|
| 1801 (240)c | 1230c (371) | 590c (634) |
|
| 2780 (380)b | 2040b (259) | 1230b (213) |
|
| 4015 (830)a | 2750a (455) | 1860a (462) |
Each value is the mean of three replicates, means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a 5% level of significance, the standard error of three replicates is presented in parentheses.
Effect of inoculum and nutrients on hydrocarbon degradation.
| Treatment | Hydrocarbon | |
| Initial (g kg−1 soil) | Residual (g kg−1 soil) | |
| Control (unvegetated soil) | 15 | 12.54 |
| Control (vegetated) | 15 | 9.39 |
|
| 15 | 12.01 |
|
| 15 | 5.25 |
|
| 15 | 3.83 |
|
| 15 | 2.04 |
Each value is the mean of three replicates, means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a 5% level of significance; the standard error of three replicates is presented in parentheses.
Figure 2Schematic representation of how bacteria containing ACC deaminase activity lower the ethylene concentration and thereby prevent ethylene-caused inhibition of root elongation.
Figure 3Ratio of gene expression and gene abundance in the vegetated and unvegetated soil.