| Literature DB >> 28681302 |
Małgorzata Pawlik1, Barbara Cania2, Sofie Thijs3, Jaco Vangronsveld3, Zofia Piotrowska-Seget4.
Abstract
Many endophytic bacteria exert beneficial effects on their host, but still little is known about the bacteria associated with plants growing in areas heavily polluted by hydrocarbons. The aim of the study was characterization of culturable hydrocarbon-degrading endophytic bacteria associated with Lotus corniculatus L. and Oenothera biennis L. collected in long-term petroleum hydrocarbon-polluted site using culture-dependent and molecular approaches. A total of 26 hydrocarbon-degrading endophytes from these plants were isolated. Phylogenetic analyses classified the isolates into the phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. The majority of strains belonged to the genera Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, and Rhodococcus. More than 90% of the isolates could grow on medium with diesel oil, approximately 20% could use n-hexadecane as a sole carbon and energy source. PCR analysis revealed that 40% of the isolates possessed the P450 gene encoding for cytochrome P450-type alkane hydroxylase (CYP153). In in vitro tests, all endophytic strains demonstrated a wide range of plant growth-promoting traits such as production of indole-3-acetic acid, hydrogen cyanide, siderophores, and phosphate solubilization. More than 40% of the bacteria carried the gene encoding for the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase (acdS). Our study shows that the diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in tested plants was different. The results revealed also that the investigated plants were colonized by endophytic bacteria possessing plant growth-promoting features and a clear potential to degrade hydrocarbons. The properties of isolated endophytes indicate that they have the high potential to improve phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-polluted soils.Entities:
Keywords: Endophytic bacteria; Lotus corniculatus L.; Oenothera biennis L.; Petroleum hydrocarbons; Plant growth-promoting mechanisms; Plant-bacteria interactions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28681302 PMCID: PMC5570797 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9496-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Based on ARDRA profiles, 16 bacteria represented different clusters of patterns were selected and identified based on 16S rDNA gene sequencing
aIdentification based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing
Fig. 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of partial 16S rDNA sequences of endophytic bacteria isolated from L. corniculatus and O. biennis. GenBank accession numbers of the strains are shown in parentheses. The bar represents 0.02 substitutions per site; bootstrap values (n = 1000) are displayed. The tree was generated using the MEGA 6.0 software
Fig. 2The graphs showing the classification of L. corniculatus and O. biennis endophytic bacteria to the Alpha-, Beta-, Gammaproteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. The percentages indicate the relative abundance of isolates that were present in the tested plants
Identification and characterization of endophytic bacteria from L. corniculatus and O. biennis
| 16S rRNA identity | PGP mechanisms | Other abilities | Genesf | Degradation potential | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Tissue | Strain | Closest type strain | PSa | IAAb | HCNc | SIDd | CMCe | Motility | ACCD ( |
|
|
| Crude oil | Diesel oil |
|
|
| Stem | 1XS |
| 1.0 ± 0.0 | 35.9 ± 3.7 | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| 1.1XS |
| − | 24.3 ± 0.9 | +++ | ng | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | ||
| 2.1XS |
| 1.8 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | ++ | + | 6.3 ± 1.2 | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 4XS |
| − | 18.8 ± 0.6 | ++ | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 5XS |
| − | 22.1 ± 1.5 | +++ | ng | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | ||
| 5.1XS |
| 7.3 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 0.3 | + | − | 4.7 ± 0.6 | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | ||
| 6.1XS |
| − | 59.9 ± 4.0 | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | ||
| 2FXS |
| 10.3 ± 1.5 | 7.9 ± 0.3 | +++ | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 5FXS |
| − | 62.6 ± 5.2 | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 6FXS |
| 2.3 ± 0.6 | 16.5 ± 0.8 | ++ | + | 7.7 ± 1.5 | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| Leaf | 1XL |
| 5.3 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | + | + | 15.3 ± 2.1 | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 5XL |
| 5.67 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | ++ | + | 14.7 ± 0.6 | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Total (%) | 58.33 | 100 | 83.33 | 50 | 41.67 | 83.33 | 41.67 | 8.33 | 16.67 | 41.67 | 100 | 91.67 | 16.67 | |||
|
| Root | 2WK |
| − | 17.2 ± 1.1 | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| 3WK |
| − | 23.4 ± 2.0 | +++ | ng | − | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 4WK |
| − | 1.8 ± 0.1 | + | ng | 2.3 ± 0.6 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 5WK |
| − | 1.4 ± 0.1 | − | ng | 2.0 ± 0.0 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 6WK |
| − | 18.6 ± 2.8 | +++ | ng | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 6.1WK |
| − | 2.0 ± 0.2 | +++ | ng | 2.7 ± 0.6 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 7WK |
| − | 1.3 ± 0.0 | +++ | ng | 1.7 ± 0.6 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 8WK |
| 3.0 ± 0.0 | 15.3 ± 1.8 | − | − | 1.7 ± 0.6 | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | ||
| 8.1WK |
| 4.0 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 1.2 | +++ | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | ||
| 10WK |
| − | 27.5 ± 1.0 | − | − | 1.7 ± 0.6 | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 10.1WK |
| − | 29.6 ± 1.0 | ++ | − | 2.0 ± 0.0 | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| 1FWK |
| 3.0 ± 0.0 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | − | + | 2.0 ± 0.0 | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | ||
| 1.1FWK |
| 1.3 ± 0.6 | 22.5 ± 1.5 | +++ | − | 3.0 ± 1.0 | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | ||
| Stem | 3.1FWS |
| − | 16.3 ± 1.0 | +++ | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | |
| Total (%) | 28.57 | 100 | 64.29 | 14.29 | 64.29 | 71.43 | 42.86 | 28.57 | 28.57 | 42.86 | 100 | 92.86 | 28.57 | |||
Determination of their potential plant growth - promoting traits, their production of cellulase, motility, degradation of hydrocarbons, and occurrence of genes encoding for enzymes involved in hydrocarbons degradation. ± standard deviation of three replicates
aInorganic calcium phosphate solubilization, the halo diameter [mm]
bIndole-3-acetic acid production [μg mL−1 of IAA]
cHydrogen cyanide production, − absent; + low efficiency; ++ medium efficiency; +++ high efficiency
dSiderophore production, − absent; + present; no growth (ng)
eCellulase production, the halo diameter [mm]
fDetection of gene encoding for acdS enzyme ACCD (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase), alkB alkane monooxygenase, alkH alkane hydroxylase, P450 cytochrome P450-type alkane hydroxylase, and CYP153
Emulsification activities of endophytic bacteria
| Strain | M9 with crude oil | M9 with | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emulsification index (%) | ||||||
| D | H | X | D | H | X | |
|
| – | – | 41.67 ± 0.84 | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | 41.67 ± 0.42 | – | – | – |
|
| 52.78 ± 0.46 | 52.78 ± 1.41 | 58.33 ± 0.59 | 47.22 ± 0.39 | 47.22 ± 0.37 | 52.78 ± 0.92 |
|
| – | – | – | 50 ± 0.53 | – | 50 ± 0.45 |
|
| – | – | 47.22 ± 0.53 | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | 47.22 ± 0.34 | – | – | – |
Strains were cultured in M9 mineral medium with one carbon source (crude oil or n-hexadecane). The values of emulsification index were determined for different substrates diesel oil, n-hexadecane, and para-xylene. Given are means ± standard deviation of three replicates
D diesel oil, H n-hexadecane, X p-xylene